| Literature DB >> 32596402 |
Mouna Kriaa1, Hanen Boukedi2, Marwa Ben Rhouma1, Yosri Ben Nasr1, Slim Tounsi2, Lotfi Mellouli1, Radhouane Kammoun1,3.
Abstract
In order to enhance the production of glucose oxidase (GOD), random mutagenesis of Aspergillus tubingensis CTM 507 was performed using the chemical and physical mutagens: nitric acid and UV irradiation, respectively. The majority of the isolated mutants showed good GOD production, but only some mutants presented a significant overproduction, as compared with the parent strain. The selected mutants (19 strains), showing an overproduction larger than 200%, are quite stable after three successive subcultures. Among these, six strains revealed an important improvement in submerged fermentation. The insecticidal activity of GOD produced by the wild and the selected mutant strains was evaluated against the third larval instars of E. kuehniella. Mutant strains U11, U12, U20, and U21, presenting the most important effect, displayed an LC50 value of 89.00, 88.51, 80.00, and 86.00 U/cm2, respectively, which was 1.5-fold more important than the wild strain (61 U/cm2). According to histopathology observations, the GOD enzyme showed approximately similar damage on the E. kuehniella midgut including rupture and disintegration of the epithelial layer and cellular vacuolization. The data supports, for the first time, the use of GOD as a pest control agent against E. kuehniella.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32596402 PMCID: PMC7294356 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9716581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Lethality rate for A. tubingensis CTM 507 after nitrous acid (a) and UV irradiation (b) treatment for different time intervals.
Figure 2Standard response of the fungus A. tubingensis and its mutants.
Figure 3Standard response of the wild and mutant strains in successive subcultures.
GOD production by different selected mutants in submerged fermentation.
| Strain | Productivity (U/g of substrate) | Amelioration | Deterioration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild | 2797 ± 0.28g | 0 | 0 |
| U1 | 5150 ± 0.04j | 84 | 0 |
| U2 | 6879 ± 0.05o | 145 | 0 |
| U3 | 8896 ± 0.03r | 218 | 0 |
| U4 | 5186 ± 0.020k | 85 | 0 |
| U5 | 588 ± 0.02a | 0 | 79 |
| U6 | 2425 ± 0.02f | 0 | 13 |
| U9 | 4166 ± 0.01i | 49 | 0 |
| U11 | 5426 ± 0.02l | 94 | 0 |
| U12 | 6051 ± 0.01m | 116 | 0 |
| U14 | 1128 ± 0.02c | 0 | 59 |
| U15 | 1945 ± 0.03e | 0 | 30 |
| U16 | 6903 ± 0.03p | 146 | 0 |
| U17 | 648 ± 0.02b | 0 | 77 |
| U20 | 7672 ± 0.02q | 174 | 0 |
| U21 | 6411 ± 0.03n | 129 | 0 |
| A4 | 1909 ± 0.03d | 0 | 31 |
| A6 | 2941 ± 0.03h | 5 | 0 |
Mean ± standard error. Different letters in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05) between strains.
Figure 4Mortality rate of Ephestia kuehniella exposed to different doses of GOD from the wild and mutant strains. Statistical difference is shown by different letters (P < 0.05) between strains.
Lethal concentrations LC50 and LC90 of GOD produced by wild and mutant strains on the first instar of E. kuehniella larvae.
| Strain | LC50 (U/cm2) | LC90 (U/cm2) |
|---|---|---|
| Wild | 61.70 ± 6.86c | 86.37 ± 8.07ab |
| U4 | 58.54 ± 17.95a | 118.76 ± 30.97ab |
| U11 | 89.01 ± 13.70f | 154.63 ± 56.19b |
| U12 | 88.51 ± 13.73f | 141.61 ± 47.68ab |
| U16 | 59.83 ± 7.40b | 84.622 ± 8.03a |
| U20 | 80 ± 9.01d | 128.87 ± 28.97ab |
| U21 | 86.24 ± 10.41e | 139.69 ± 37.44ab |
Mean ± standard error. Different letters in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05) between strains.
Figure 5Histopathological effects of glucose oxidase on E. kuehniella midguts. (a) Section through the midgut epithelium of control larvae not exposed to toxins. (b) Section through the midgut epithelium of E. kuehniella larvae fed with wild strain-containing diet. (c) Section through the midgut epithelium of E. kuehniella larvae fed with U4-containing diet. (d) Section through the midgut epithelium of E. kuehniella larvae fed with U11-containing diet. (e) Section through the midgut epithelium of E. kuehniella larvae fed with U12-containing diet. (f) Section through the midgut epithelium of E. kuehniella larvae fed with U16-containing diet. (g) Section through the midgut epithelium of E. kuehniella larvae fed with U20-containing diet. (h) Section through the midgut epithelium of E. kuehniella larvae fed with U21-containing diet. (a) Regular epithelial cell and well-developed lumen contents. (b–h) Extensive damage of the midgut epithelium. Lu: lumen; Am: apical membrane; Bm: basal membrane; V: vacuole formation. Magnification: 40x.