| Literature DB >> 32596400 |
Ranjdar Mahmood Talabani1, Balkees Taha Garib2, Reza Masaeli3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the bioactivity and physicochemical properties of three commercial calcium silicate-based endodontic materials (MTA, EndoSequence Root Repair Material putty, and Biodentine™). Material and Methods. Horizontal sections of 3 mm thickness from 18 root canals of human teeth were subjected to biomechanical preparation with WaveOne Gold large rotary instruments. The twelve specimens were filled with three tested materials (MM-MTA, EndoSequence Root Repair Material putty, and Biodentine™) and immersed in phosphate-buffered saline for 7 and 30 days. After this period of time, each specimen of each material was processed for morphological observation, surface precipitates, and interfacial dentin using SEM. In addition, the surface morphology of the set materials, without soaking in phosphate-buffered solution after one day and after 28 days stored in phosphate-buffered saline, was evaluated using SEM; also, the pH of the soaking water and the amount of calcium ions released from the test materials were measured by using an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy test. Data obtained were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significant difference test with a significance level of 5%. RESULT: The formation of precipitates was observed on the surfaces of all materials at 1 week and increased substantially over time. Interfacial layers in some areas of the dentin-cement interface were found from one week of immersion. All the analyzed materials showed alkaline pH and capacity to release calcium ions; however, the concentrations of released calcium ions were significantly more in Biodentine and ESRRM putty than MM-MTA (P < 0.05). ESRRM putty maintained a pH of around 11 after 28 days.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32596400 PMCID: PMC7273418 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9576930
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Composition of calcium silicate-based cements used in this study.
| Material | Manufacturer | The composition according to manufacturer | Lot no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| MM-MTA | MicroMega, Besançon France | Powder: tricalcium silicate, dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, bismuth oxide, calcium sulfate dehydrate, and magnesium oxide. Liquid: calcium carbonate | 71708614 |
| ESRRM putty | Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA | Tricalcium silicate, dicalcium silicate, calcium phosphate monobasic, calcium hydroxide, colloidal silica, water-free thickening agent | B19585 |
| Biodentine | Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France | Powder: tricalcium silicate (Ca3SiO5), dicalcium silicate (Ca2SiO4), calcium carbonate (CaCO3), iron oxide (Fe2O3), and zirconium oxide (ZrO2). Liquid: water (H2O) with calcium chloride (CaCl2) and soluble polymer (polycarboxylate) | 5024200U0 |
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy examination of the tested materials (1 = MM-MTA, 2 = ESRRM putty, 3 = Biodentine) immersed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 week ((a) low power 1 μm; (b) high power 100 μm) and 28 days ((c) low power 1 μm; (d) high power 100 μm). All specimens immersed in PBS for 1 week demonstrated formation of precipitates (blue arrow) on the material's surface. At 28 days (c), the specimens showed a large amount of precipitates (red and blue arrows). Formation of precipitates at the dentin-material interface (red arrow) extended over material and dentin surfaces (blue arrow) in some areas following one week and 28 days of immersion (c). At higher magnification, the formation of an interfacial layer could be seen at the material-dentin interface (d). M: material; I: interface; D: dentin.
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of set cements after one day and before soaking in PBS and after 28 days soaking in PBS at different magnification (50, 100, and 200 μm).
Figure 3Mean pH values of soaking water of MM-MTA, ESRRM putty, and BD along different time intervals.
Noncumulative calcium ion release in ppm (mg/L) (mean ± standard deviation, n = 5 for each material) observed at the different periods (values followed by different letters in the same line (i.e., between the materials and among the times) indicate statistically significant differences according to Tukey's honest significant difference test (P < 0.05)).
| Times | Materials | ANOVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM-MTA ( | (ESRRMs putty) ( | BD ( | ||
| 24 hours | 461.82a (±104.2246) | 1088.34b (±238.6041) | 1019.82b (±325.709) |
|
| 48 hours | 398.74a (±65.08892) | 872.66b (±197.6176) | 877.6b (±159.5173) |
|
| 7 days | 352.78a (±78.03606) | 887.68b (±207.6355) | 886.66b (±151.095) |
|
| 28 days | 260.62a (±52.82828) | 598.9b (±127.5169) | 543.76b (±199.1337) |
|
Figure 4Mean of cumulative calcium released (ppm) in soaking water.