| Literature DB >> 32596308 |
Hongyan Liu1, Min Niu2, Shu Zhu3, Fang Zhang4, Qian Liu4, Yang Liu1, Ruohan Liu4, Yongqing Zhang4.
Abstract
High-efficiency monoculture severely inhibits the growth of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge and decreases the yield and quality of crude drug, thus resulting in serious economic losses in China. Here, we selected four replanted field soils with 1, 2, 3, and 4 years of monoculture history to investigate the influence of continuous monocropping soil on the property of medicinal materials by pot experiments. Results showed that the commodity appearance and active ingredient contents of Salvia miltiorrhiza were significantly affected by soil with different continuous monocropping years. Along the time series of plantation soil, the diameter of main roots, weight of fresh roots, and total contents of hydrophilic and lipophilic components demonstrated a decline tendency. With the method of PCA, the property of medicinal materials affected by continuous monocropping soil was evaluated by the following formula: F = (0.3762 × F1 + 0.2320 × F2 + 0.1913 × F3 + 0.0994 × F4)/0.8989. Eventually, crude drug properties ranked according to comprehensive scores were as follows: CK (0.380) > 1 year (0.360) > 2 years (0.348) > 3 years (0.337) > 4 years (0.245). For the medicinal plant of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge, continuous monocropping soil had significant effects on the property of Salvia miltiorrhiza and should be ameliorated by some measures. The results provide support for the optimal continuous cropping year selection and continuous cropping obstacle abatement of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32596308 PMCID: PMC7275237 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4284385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Effects of continuous cropping soil on the biomass of S. miltiorrhiza roots (n = 50).
| Groups | Diameter of main roots (cm) | Length of main roots (cm) | Fresh weight of roots (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 12.11 ± 1.43A | 15.33 ± 0.81A | 62.07 ± 2.74A |
| 1-year continuous cropping soil | 10.58 ± 1.01B | 10.47 ± 0.64B | 46.60 ± 2.03B |
| 2-year continuous cropping soil | 9.81 ± 0.59B | 9.26 ± 1.23B | 38.14 ± 1.45C |
| 3-year continuous cropping soil | 8.12 ± 1.32C | 10.15 ± 1.38B | 31.75 ± 1.12D |
| 4-year continuous cropping soil | 7.71 ± 0.91C | 9.62 ± 0.98B | 28.71 ± 1.31E |
Note: the values denoted by different letters within the same column represent significant difference at the 0.05 level as compared with various concentration treatment groups.
Regression data of eight analytes.
| Analyte | Regression equation |
| Linear range ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lithospermic acid |
| 0.9916 | 1.43~28.64 |
| Salvianolic acid B |
| 1 | 17.43~348.50 |
| Rosemary acid |
| 0.9991 | 1.81~36.20 |
| Danshensu sodium |
| 0.9993 | 0.30~5.90 |
| Dihydrotanshinone I |
| 1 | 1.54~30.86 |
| Tanshinone IIA |
| 0.9999 | 0.52~10.34 |
| Cryptotanshinone |
| 1 | 1.32~26.48 |
| Tanshinone I |
| 0.9998 | 0.066~13.18 |
Figure 1The HPLC chromatogram of the hydrophilic reference compounds of Salvia miltiorrhiza. The peaks are 1 (danshensu sodium), 2 (rosemary acid), 3 (lithospermic acid), and 4 (salvianolic acid B).
Figure 2The HPLC chromatogram of the lipophilic reference compounds of Salvia miltiorrhiza. The peaks are 5 (dihydrotanshinone I), 6 (cryptotanshinone), 7 (tanshinone I), and 8 (tanshinone IIA).
Figure 3The HPLC chromatogram of hydrophilic components in samples from different treatment groups. The peaks are 1 (danshensu sodium), 2 (rosemary acid), 3 (lithospermic acid), and 4 (salvianolic acid B).
Figure 4The HPLC chromatogram of lipophilic components in samples from different treatment groups. The peaks are 5 (dihydrotanshinone I), 6 (cryptotanshinone), 7 (tanshinone I), and 8 (tanshinone IIA).
Effects of continuous cropping soil on Salvia miltiorrhiza hydrophilic compositions (, n = 3).
| Groups | Contents (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danshensu sodium | Rosemary acid | Lithospermic acid | Salvianolic acid B | Total content | |
| Control | 0.035 ± 0.0013A | 0.434 ± 0.0056A | 0.328 ± 0.0016A | 4.421 ± 0.0167A | 5.218 |
| 1-year continuously cultivated soil | 0.051 ± 0.0006B | 0.416 ± 0.0017B | 0.298 ± 0.0087B | 4.217 ± 0.0088B | 4.982 |
| 2-year continuously cultivated soil | 0.052 ± 0.0025B | 0.229 ± 0.0025C | 0.262 ± 0.0027B | 4.433 ± 0.0011C | 4.976 |
| 3-year continuously cultivated soil | 0.044 ± 0.0005B | 0.437 ± 0.0009A | 0.246 ± 0.0008C | 2.044 ± 0.0039B | 2.771 |
| 4-year continuously cultivated soil | 0.053 ± 0.0016B | 0.588 ± 0.0007D | 0.228 ± 0.0007D | 1.941 ± 0.0017D | 2.809 |
Note: the values denoted by different letters within the same column represent significant difference at the 0.05 level as compared with various concentration treatment groups.
Effects of continuously cultivated soils on Salvia miltiorrhiza lipophilic constituents (, n = 3).
| Groups | Contents (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dihydrotanshinone I | Cryptotanshinone | Tanshinone I | Tanshinone IIA | Total content | |
| Control | 0.217 ± 0.0065A | 0.564 ± 0.0060A | 0.268 ± 0.0015A | 0.305 ± 0.0013A | 1.354 |
| 1-year continuously cultivated soil | 0.262 ± 0.0005B | 0.481 ± 0.0001B | 0.242 ± 0.0027B | 0.258 ± 0.0002B | 1.243 |
| 2-year continuously cultivated soil | 0.302 ± 0.0004C | 0.331 ± 0.0019C | 0.158 ± 0.0004C | 0.128 ± 0.0009C | 0.92 |
| 3-year continuously cultivated soil | 0.231 ± 0.0012AB | 0.252 ± 0.0006D | 0.099 ± 0.0016D | 0.082 ± 0.0002D | 0.664 |
| 4-year continuously cultivated soil | 0.171 ± 0.0011D | 0.165 ± 0.0012E | 0.076 ± 0.0005E | 0.052 ± 0.0011E | 0.464 |
Note: the values denoted by different letters within the same column represent significant difference at the 0.05 level as compared with various concentration treatment groups.
Eigenvalue and variance contribution rate of principal components.
| Principal component | Eigenvalue | Variance contribution rate (%) | Cumulative variance contribution rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 4.138 | 37.617 | 37.617 |
| F2 | 2.552 | 23.202 | 60.819 |
| F3 | 2.105 | 19.132 | 79.951 |
| F4 | 1.093 | 9.935 | 89.886 |
The factor load matrix of variables.
| Variable | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Danshensu sodium | 0.906 | -0.038 | 0.225 | -0.212 |
|
| ||||
| Rosemary acid | -0.834 | 0.07 | -0.396 | -0.314 |
|
| ||||
| Lithospermic acid | 0.926 | 0.127 | 0.26 | -0.126 |
|
| ||||
| Salvianolic acid B | 0.832 | 0.427 | 0.14 | 0.063 |
|
| ||||
| Dihydrotanshinone I | -0.553 | 0.196 | 0.722 | 0.038 |
|
| ||||
| Cryptotanshinone | -0.254 | 0.652 | 0.469 | 0.462 |
|
| ||||
| Tanshinone I | -0.341 | 0.894 | 0.142 | 0.156 |
|
| ||||
| Tanshinone IIA | 0.373 | 0.514 | -0.682 | 0.132 |
|
| ||||
| Diameter of main roots | 0.399 | -0.308 | -0.455 | 0.72 |
|
| ||||
| Length of main roots | 0.318 | -0.513 | 0.587 | 0.051 |
|
| ||||
| Fresh root weight | 0.431 | 0.681 | -0.176 | -0.388 |