| Literature DB >> 32595754 |
Lei Xu1, Renjie Wang2, Hongyu Liu1, Jiaoqi Wang1, Jing Mang1, Zhongxin Xu1.
Abstract
The effects of resveratrol on various conditions have been widely studied previously. This paper aimed to investigate the influence of resveratrol on atherosclerosis (AS). Twenty-four New Zealand male rabbits were randomly and equally assigned to the normal diet group (NDG), fat diet group (FDG), and fat diet with resveratrol group (80 mg/kg/d, RFG). Biochemical indicators from blood samples were analyzed at baseline and 3 months to investigate the effects of resveratrol on blood lipid, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), liver, and renal function. The indicators including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatinine (CREA), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and Lp-PLA2. At 3 months, arteries were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to study the influence of resveratrol on the aortic intima, smooth muscle layer, and the intima/media ratio. Comparisons of weight, ALT, AST, CREA, TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and Lp-PLA2 among the three groups showed no significant difference at baseline. However, at the end of 3 months, significant differences were observed in AST, CREA, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and Lp-PLA2 between the three groups (P < 0.05). In pairwise comparison, CREA, TC, LDL-C, and Lp-PLA2 had significant differences between any two groups (P < 0.05). In addition, there were significant differences in the AST and HDL-C levels between RFG and NDG groups (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the HDL-C levels were also significantly different between the FDG and NDG groups (P < 0.01). The histologic analysis also showed that the thickness of the aortic intima and the ratio of the intima and aortic tunica media (P < 0.05) significantly decreased in RFG compared to FDG. Resveratrol may have an antiatherosclerosis effect on a rabbit model of AS.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32595754 PMCID: PMC7256704 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9641582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Representative photomicrographs of aortic arch sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin of a normal diet group (NDG) and a fat diet group (FDG) in the preliminary experiment. Magnification: 10x. Bar represents 100 μm. The red arrow indicates that, compared with the NDG, foam cells formed under the intima in the FDG. Meanwhile, the intima was thickened, and plaques were formed. This showed that the atherosclerosis model was successfully established after a high-fat diet.
Biochemical analysis of rabbits from NDG (n = 8), FDG (n = 8), and RFG (n = 8) analyzed before the beginning of the fat diet (baseline).
| NDG ( | FDG ( | RFG ( |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 0.99 ± 0.08 | 1.01 ± 0.08 | 0.903 | 0.420 | |
| ALT | 43.20 ± 9.65 | 41.22 ± 8.83 | 44.76 ± 12.80 | 0.226 | 0.800 | |
| AST | 36.38 ± 8.61 | 33.73 ± 5.91 | 34.88 ± 4.98 | 0.317 | 0.732 | |
| CREA | 67.94 ± 8.39 | 64.72 ± 6.27 | 65.75 ± 9.69 | 0.318 | 0.731 | |
| TG | 0.63 ± 0.20 | 0.50 ± 0.16 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 2.230 | 0.132 | |
| TC | 1.94 ± 0.21 | 1.88 ± 0.28 | 1.99 ± 0.43 | 0.240 | 0.789 | |
| HDL-C | 0.93 ± 0.19 | 0.94 ± 0.25 | 0.93 ± 0.17 | 0.006 | 0.994 | |
| LDL-C | 0.84 ± 0.22 | 0.95 ± 0.12 | 0.80 ± 0.27 | 1.053 | 0.367 | |
| Lp-PLA2# | 461.50 ± 89.57 | 525.48 ± 32.50 | 494.88 ± 32.56 | 2.424 | 0.113 | |
#The test result of homogeneity of variance was P < 0.05, and Dunnett's T method was used for multiple comparison of P value correction, while the Bonferroni method was used for the other indicators. NDG, normal diet group; FDG, fat diet group; RFG, fat diet with resveratrol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CREA, creatinine; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp-PLA2, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2.
Biochemical analysis of rabbits from NDG (n = 8), FDG (n = 8), and RFG (n = 8) analyzed at the end of the 3-month fat diet.
| NDG ( | FDG ( | RFG ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg)# | 2.90 ± 0.08 | 2.98 ± 0.15 | 2.96 ± 0.07 | 1.160 | 0.333 |
| ALT | 44.81 ± 7.95 | 50.86 ± 24.53 | 61.06 ± 20.26 | 1.506 | 0.245 |
| AST# | 40.51 ± 6.46 | 84.32 ± 54.94 | 77.91 ± 24.54a | 3.668 | 0.043 |
| CREA | 77.38 ± 10.45 | 111.92 ± 11.38a | 127.63 ± 10.84a,b | 44.526 | <0.001 |
| TG | 0.62 ± 0.21 | 0.90 ± 0.42 | 0.76 ± 0.28 | 1.567 | 0.232 |
| TC# | 2.19 ± 0.30 | 30.32 ± 5.74a | 11.84 ± 2.78a,b | 120.264 | <0.001 |
| HDL# | 1.03 ± 0.20 | 3.28 ± 1.61a | 1.58 ± 0.35a | 11.946 | <0.001 |
| LDL | 0.91 ± 0.22 | 16.45 ± 3.16a | 6.23 ± 1.53a,b | 120.880 | <0.001 |
| Lp-PLA2# | 520.14 ± 51.55 | 1928.88 ± 385.78a | 953.20 ± 96.66a,b | 77.698 | <0.001 |
#The test result of homogeneity of variance was P < 0.05, and Dunnett's T method was used for multiple comparison of P value correction, while the Bonferroni method was used for the other indicators. NDG, normal diet group; FDG, fat diet group; RFG, fat diet with resveratrol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CREA, creatinine; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp-PLA2, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2. aStatistically significant when compared to NDG at P < 0.05. bStatistically significant when compared to FDG at P < 0.05.
Biochemical analysis of rabbits from RFG (n = 8) before the beginning of the treatment with fat diet and at the end of the 3-month fat diet.
| Baseline ( | After 3 months ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight(kg) (NDG) | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 2.90 ± 0.08 | −73.655 | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) (FDG) | 0.99 ± 0.08 | 2.98 ± 0.15 | −49.925 | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) (RFG) | 1.01 ± 0.08 | 2.96 ± 0.07 | −39.000 | <0.001 |
| ALT (NDG) | 43.20 ± 9.65 | 44.81 ± 7.95 | −0.781 | 0.461 |
| ALT (FDG) | 41.22 ± 8.83 | 50.86 ± 24.53 | −1.172 | 0.280 |
| ALT (RFG) | 44.76 ± 12.80 | 61.06 ± 20.26 | −2.160 | 0.068 |
| AST (NDG) | 36.38 ± 8.61 | 40.51 ± 6.46 | −2.490 | 0.042 |
| AST (FDG) | 33.73 ± 5.91 | 84.32 ± 54.94 | −2.639 | 0.033 |
| AST (RFG) | 34.88 ± 4.98 | 77.91 ± 24.54 | −5.587 | 0.001 |
| CREA (NDG) | 67.94 ± 8.39 | 77.38 ± 10.45 | −7.002 | <0.001 |
| CREA (FDG) | 64.72 ± 6.27 | 111.92 ± 11.38 | −10.794 | <0.001 |
| CREA (RFG) | 65.75 ± 9.69 | 127.63 ± 10.84 | −12.390 | <0.001 |
| TG (NDG) | 0.63 ± 0.20 | 0.62 ± 0.21 | 0.086 | 0.934 |
| TG (FDG) | 0.50 ± 0.16 | 0.90 ± 0.42 | −2.230 | 0.061 |
| TG (RFG) | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.76 ± 0.28 | −2.986 | 0.020 |
| TC (NDG) | 1.94 ± 0.21 | 2.19 ± 0.30 | −2.919 | 0.022 |
| TC (FDG) | 1.88 ± 0.28 | 30.32 ± 5.74 | −14.078 | <0.001 |
| TC (RFG) | 1.99 ± 0.43 | 11.84 ± 2.78 | −9.275 | <0.001 |
| HDL (NDG) | 0.93 ± 0.19 | 1.03 ± 0.20 | −3.359 | 0.012 |
| HDL (FDG) | 0.94 ± 0.25 | 3.28 ± 1.61 | −3.815 | 0.007 |
| HDL (RFG) | 0.93 ± 0.17 | 1.58 ± 0.35 | −4.880 | 0.002 |
| LDL (NDG) | 0.84 ± 0.22 | 0.91 ± 0.22 | −1.270 | 0.245 |
| LDL (FDG) | 0.95 ± 0.12 | 16.45 ± 3.16 | −13.489 | <0.001 |
| LDL (RFG) | 0.80 ± 0.27 | 6.23 ± 1.53 | −9.221 | <0.001 |
| Lp-PLA2# (NDG) | 461.50 ± 89.57 | 520.14 ± 51.55 | −1.930 | 0.095 |
| Lp-PLA2# (FDG) | 525.48 ± 32.50 | 1928.88 ± 385.78 | −10.090 | <0.001 |
| Lp-PLA2# (RFG) | 494.88 ± 32.56 | 953.20 ± 96.66 | −12.816 | <0.001 |
#The test result of homogeneity of variance was P < 0.05, and Dunnett's T method was used for multiple comparison of P value correction, while the Bonferroni method was used for the other indicators. NDG, normal diet group; FDG, fat diet group; RFG, fat diet with resveratrol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CREA, creatinine; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp-PLA2, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2.
Figure 2Representative photomicrographs of aortic arch sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin of a normal diet group (NDG), a fat diet group (FDG), and a resveratrol-treated FDG group (RFG). Magnification: 10x. Bar represents 100 μm. The red arrows indicate the thickening intima and plaque formation in the FDG and RFG, which were compared with the NDG. The intimal thickness of RGF was significantly lower than that of FDG (P < 0.05).
Pathological parameters of aortic arch atherosclerosis observed under the microscope of RFG and FDG.
| Group | Mean | SD (±) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intima | FDG | 124.76 | 6.83 | 0.001 |
| RFG | 52.44 | 14.94 | ||
|
| ||||
| Smooth muscle layer | FDG | 194.16 | 10.2 | 0.65 |
| RFG | 173.48 | 4.05 | ||
|
| ||||
| Intima/media ratio | FDG | 0.64 | 0.04 | 0.001 |
| RFG | 0.30 | 0.09 | ||
Unit, μm; SD, standard deviation; FDG, fat diet group; RFG, fat diet with resveratrol.