| Literature DB >> 32595261 |
Joanna Białkowska1, Dorota Mroczkowska1, Margaret E Huflejt1, Joanna Wojtkiewicz1, Tomasz Siwek1, Monika Barczewska1, Wojciech Maksymowicz1.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a progressive and fatal degenerative neuromuscular disease with few if any treatment options and physical rehabilitation addressing specific deficits is the most frequent form of therapy. Patients also suffer from depression and increased anxiety. Our purpose was to assess the neurorehabilitation effectiveness in a patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who underwent stem cell transplantation but refused physiotherapy due to depression. Disease progression was followed using the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale bimonthly for six months pre- and then post-stem cell transplantation. Psychological traits were assessed using six standardized tests. Quantitative electroencephalogram diagnostics was performed before the first and after the last neurofeedback session, and sessions were conducted on a 3-times-a-week basis. The physiotherapy protocol included proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, electrical modalities unit applied to the lumbar spine area, and breathing, relaxation and walking exercises, among others. Increased motivation and marked decrease in the pain level was associated with the patient's willingness to complete physiotherapy, which resulted in improvements in most neuromuscular deficits and in increased respiratory capacity. During the 12 post-rehabilitation months, progression of the disease decelerated, and a positive behavioral change was noted. The study suggested that neurofeedback could be used as a neurorehabilitation component of the personalized complex rehabilitation protocol in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Entities:
Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Biofeedback, psychology; Depression; Quality of life
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32595261 PMCID: PMC7314291 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.04.24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Clin Croat ISSN: 0353-9466 Impact factor: 0.780
Fig. 1ALSFRS-R scores reported bimonthly for patient during pre- [1b-4b] and post- [1a-4a] stem cell transplantation period. Arrow indicates the stem cell transplantation time point. The 12 ALSFRS-R scored tasks are listed in the inset, with color shades grouped according to the activity types. The [pt/period] indices represent total bimonthly ALSFRS-R changes in the pre- [1b-4b] and post- [1a-4a] stem cell transplantation period. ALSFRS-R = Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised
Assessment of the patient’s psychological and personality traits prior to rehabilitation
| Assessment goal | Results | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|
| STAI - Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory | ||
| Measure of trait and state anxiety | Anxiety as a trait - sten 7/10, | Moderate tendency to perceive minor threatening situations as serious endangerments and reaction to these with anxiety and fear, which indicates that this patient did not suffer earlier from an anxious personality disorder. In the current situation, however, the patient suffers from elevated anxiety and conscious feeling of fear and stress, with accompanying activation of the autonomic nervous system. |
| Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) | ||
| Assessment of the personality traits | Neuroticism 6/10, Extraversion 7/10, Psychoticism 4/10, Lie 6/10, Agreeableness 5/10 | Moderate increase in intensity of neuroticism, extraversion, psychoticism, agreeableness, tendency to lie. |
| Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS) | ||
| Mood and depression assessment | Score: 17/58 | Low mood, moderate depression. |
| Common Task Test | ||
| Executive functions | CTT1 - ten 43/100; CTT2 - ten 31/100 | Impaired abilities to plan and perform more complex tasks; lack of focus on the external stimuli; low resistance to distraction; impaired attention types: sustained, divided and alternating; impaired cognitive and sequential information-processing abilities. |
| ACE-R Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination - Final Revised Version | ||
| Assessment of attention/orientation, memory, verbal fluency, visuospatial abilities, language functioning | Attention/orientation (15/18), memory (13/26), verbal fluency (10/14), visuospatial (8/16) | Deterioration of attention/orientation, memory, verbal fluency and visuospatial abilities; no deficits in language functioning. |
| Raven Matrices Test | ||
| Assessment of intellectual abilities | sten 7/10 (percentile 77/100) | Above average |
| IQCODE Questionnaire | ||
| Assessment of patient’s functioning compared with 10 years before | Decline of memory and executive/decision making functions at the average level as compared to the overall patient’s functioning 10 years before was established during the interview with his family members. | |
Experimental physiotherapy protocol developed for rehabilitation following stem cell transplantation
| Type of exercises | Schedule of exercises |
|---|---|
| Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) | 1x daily, 6x |
| Passive stretching exercises of shoulder joints, as well as passive and progressive resistive exercises of lower extremities | 1x daily, 6x |
| Manual therapy including classic massage techniques to shoulder girdle and upper extremity musculature | 1x daily, 6x |
| Trigger point therapy | 1x daily, 3x |
| Manipulative techniques | 1x daily, 6x |
| Electrical modalities including TENS unit applied to the lumbar spine area | 1x daily, 6x |
| Laser applied to painful areas, shoulder girdle and lumbar spine area | 1x daily, duration: 3 min., 6x |
| Warm gel compresses applied to painful areas including shoulder joints | 1x daily, every day, 2x20 min |
| Breathing and relaxation exercises | 1x daily, 6x |
| Vestibular exercises | 1x daily, 6x |
| Walking training using standard walker | 3x daily, training duration depending on patient condition and willingness, starting with 5 min, gradually increasing to 3x20 min daily |
Unless otherwise stated, all types of exercises listed were carried out throughout the 30-day rehabilitation period
Fig. 2Pre- vs. post-treatment changes in the amplitudes of the given waves for the respective leads in quantitative EEG analyses.
Fig. 3Pre- vs. post-treatment changes in the amplitudes of SMR waves for the respective leads in quantitative EEG analyses. SMR = sensorimotor rhythm
Summary of major benefits for the patient assessed post-30-day rehabilitation period
| Patient evaluation method | Patient status / score before therapy | Patient status / score following therapy |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analog scale (VAS) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
| Six-minute walk test (6MWT) | 192 meters | 224 meters |
| Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS) | 17/58 | 6/58 |
| Barthel ADL index | 7/20 | 15/20 |
| EEG Neurofeedback: amplitudes of SMR wave in the C3 point | 7.03 | 6.12 |
| EEG Neurofeedback: amplitudes of SMR wave in the C4 point | 6.33 | 6.84 |
| Measure of state anxiety | sten 4/10 | sten 3/10 |
| Executive functions | CTT1 - ten 43/100; | CTT1 - ten 46/100; |
| Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment Tool | ||
| Gait score | 8/12 | 9/12 |
| Balance score | 8/16 | 12/16 |
| Total score: balance + gait | 16/28 | 21/28 |