PROOXIDANT ACTIVITIES OF ANTIOXIDANTS AND THEIR IMPACT ON HEALTH.

This review article is focused on the impact of antioxidants and prooxidants on health with emphasis on the type of antioxidants that should be taken. Medical researchers suggest that diet may be the solution for the control of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular complications, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and different cancers. In this survey, we found scientific evidence that the use of antioxidants should be limited only to the cases where oxidative stress has been identified. This is often the case of specific population groups such as postmenopausal women, the elderly, infants, workers exposed to environmental pollutants, and the obese. Before starting any supplementation, it is necessary to measure oxidative stress and to identify and eliminate the possible sources of free radicals and thus increased oxidative stress.

Introduction

Today, the world is witnessing an upsurge in chronic diseases such as cardiovascular complications, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and different cancers. Medical researchers suggest that diet may be the solution for the control of these chronic diseases. Diets rich in fruits and vegetables have been reported to have a protective effect against cardiovascular disease and cancer (-). The nutrients thought to provide protection by fruits and vegetables are antioxidants (, ). Oxidative stress is the basic etiology of disease and can be viewed as an imbalance between antioxidants and prooxidants in the body. Antioxidants that can react with molecular oxygen and are reducing agents can act as prooxidants. Under aerobic conditions, they generate superoxide radicals and dismutate to H2O2, which reacts with reduced metal ions and superoxide to form toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS). For example, flavonoids can react as prooxidants when a reduced metal is available, and tocopherols can also act as prooxidants when transition metals such as Cu(I) are present, but this depends on the matrix environment in which it is present. It might not always be beneficial to increase cellular viability with a high dose of antioxidants such as beta-carotene or vitamin E prior to toxic compound-induced exposure (ionizing radiation, UV radiation, cigarette smoke). ROS scavengers, such as ascorbic acid, can act in oxidation-reduction reactions both as prooxidants and antioxidants, depending on the conditions (-).

The question is whether decreasing damage with antioxidants may boost the occurrence of neoplasia by permitting genetically damaged cells to survive. The research by Halliwell and Gutteridge () confirmed this hypothesis. After vitamin supplementation, the subject mortality rate increased, which was probably the result of the antioxidant effect on cell proliferation (, ). Malignancy may be enhanced under the antioxidant activity that encourages survival of precursor tumor cells in altered matrix environments.

In spite of the high number of antioxidant studies provided by Pubmed, it is still not clear if the antioxidant supplementation is beneficial or harmful, especially for the healthy well-nourished populations. The goal of this article is to review the impact of antioxidants and prooxidants on health and find the answer to the question: should supplements of antioxidants be taken?

Natural Antioxidants

Halliwell and Gutteridge () defined antioxidants as “any substance that delays, prevents or removes oxidative damage to a target molecule”. Others defined them as “any substance that directly scavenges ROS or indirectly acts to up-regulate antioxidant defenses or inhibits ROS production”. The antioxidant activity is effective through different ways, i.e. by interrupting propagation of the auto-oxidation chain reaction; as inhibitors of free radical oxidation reaction; as inhibitors of prooxidative enzymes; as reducing agents that convert hydroperoxides into stable compounds; as metal chelators that convert iron and copper (metal prooxidants) into stable products; and as singlet oxygen quenchers (, , ). It seems likely that, in vivo, the activation of enzymatic antioxidant defenses is more important than radical scavenging () by exogenous antioxidants ingested from the food.

Endogenous antioxidative cell defenses include a network of enzymatic and non-enzymatic molecules that are distributed within the cytoplasm and cell organelles (Fig. 1). The enzymatic antioxidants are divided into primary and secondary enzymatic defenses. The primary antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), several peroxidases and catalase, catalyze a cascade of reactions to convert ROS to more stable molecules such as H2O and O2. One molecule of catalase can convert 6 billion molecules of hydrogen peroxide. Superoxide dismutase catalyzes dismutation of superoxide anion (O2-) to H2O2 and O2. The rate of this enzymatic dismutation is approximately 10 000 times greater than the spontaneous rate (). SOD converts superoxide anions into hydrogen peroxide as a substrate for catalase ().

Fig. 1

Classification of antioxidants (-, , ).

Besides primary enzymes, a large number of secondary enzymes (glutathione reductase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) do not neutralize ROS directly, but act in association with other endogenous antioxidants. Glutathione reductase reduces glutathione and recycles it to neutralize even more ROS. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase regenerates nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) creating a reducing condition ().

There are quite a number of non-enzymatic endogenous antioxidants. Cofactor as coenzyme Q10 is present in cells and membranes and plays an important role in cellular metabolism and in the respiratory chain. Turunen et al. () report that this coenzyme Q10 neutralizes the lipid peroxyl radicals and regenerates vitamin E. Vitamin A (retinol) is produced by the liver. There are different forms of vitamin A; their antioxidant effect is the ability to combine with peroxyl radicals before they propagate peroxidation to lipids (). Uric acid is a nitrogen non-protein compound that has an important function within the body (after undergoing renal filtration, 90% of it is reabsorbed). It prevents the lysis of erythrocytes and is an important scavenger of singlet oxygen ().

Small molecular-weight non-enzymatic antioxidants, i.e. glutathione, vitamins E and C, minerals such selenium, and NADPH act as scavengers of ROS. Glutathione is an organosulfur compound, which besides protecting cells against radicals, regenerates vitamin C.

Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is the major hydrophilic antioxidant and a powerful inhibitor of lipid peroxidation. It can scavenge the reactive nitrogen oxide, superoxide radical anion, hydroxyl radical and singlet oxygen (), and promotes the regeneration of alpha-tocopherol.

Vitamin E is composed of four isoforms of tocopherols and four isoforms of tocotrienols. Alpha tocopherol is the most abundant and potent; it halts lipid peroxidation and then protects the lipid structure of cell membranes; it is thought to prevent atherosclerosis (). Selenium and zinc are found in trace quantities but play an important role in animal and human metabolism. Selenium does not act directly on ROS but is an important part of the antioxidant enzymes (e.g., glutathione peroxidase) (). Just like selenium, zinc does not attack ROS directly, but prevents their formation ().

Flavonoids are natural food-derived components (fruits, vegetables and herbs) that have received great attention in the last decades. They are composed of flavonols, flavanols, anthocyanins, isoflavonoids, flavonones and flavones. All these categories share the same diphenylpropane skeleton. The most abundant flavonol is quercetin; it prevents oxidative stress and cell death by scavenging ROS, chelating metal ions and quenching singlet oxygen (). The most abundant flavanol is catechin present in red wines (); it has an important antioxidant, anti-inflammatory effect and estrogenic growth-promoting effect ().

Phenolic acids are divided in two groups, hydroxycinnamic (ferulic acid, p-coumaric) and hydroxybenzoic acids (gallic and ellagic acid). They act as chelators and ROS scavengers with special effect on hydroxyl and peroxyl radicals. The most promising compound is gallic acid (precursor of tannins) ().

Synthetic Antioxidants

Synthetic antioxidants are added to the food so it can withstand different treatments. Their focus is to prevent food oxidation, especially fatty acids. Today, almost all processed foods have synthetic antioxidants incorporated and are reported to be safe, although some studies indicate otherwise (). Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and butylated hydroxyanizole (BHA) are the most widely used synthetic antioxidants. The European food safety authority () has established revised acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) of 0.25 mg/kg bw/day for BHT and 1.0 mg/kg bw/day for BHA. Octyl gallate (OG) seems to be safe to use because it is hydrolyzed after ingestion into gallic acid and octanol, which are present in plants ().

Prooxidants

Prooxidants are defined as chemicals that induce oxidative stress, through formation of ROS or by inhibiting the antioxidant system. They may be classified into several categories (Table 1), as follows: drugs, redox-active metals, pesticides, physical exercise, mental anxiety, pathophysiological conditions, environmental factors (air pollutants and ionizing and non-ionizing radiation), water disinfection products, and antioxidants ().

Table 1

Different classes of agents with prooxidant properties, their mechanism of oxidative stress generation and their prevention with antioxidants

Drugs such as analgesic (paracetamol) or anticancerous (methotrexate) agents generate ROS and alter macromolecules, which can finally damage liver and kidney tissues. Redox-active metals such as iron and copper can induce Fenton reaction and Haber-Weiss reaction leading to excessive formation of ROS. For example, hematochromatosis is a prooxidant disease due to high iron level, and Wilson disease results in copper overload in the liver and brain (-). Pesticides such as DDT stimulate ROS generation, induction of lipid peroxidation, and alteration of the antioxidant enzymes and glutathione redox system. Rigorous physical exercise such as running and weight lifting generates the production of ROS because of muscle contraction and increased oxygen consumption. Mental anxiety and apprehension induce imbalance in the redox system and lead to neuro-inflammation, neurodegeneration, inhibition of neurogenesis and mitochondrial dysfunction. Local ischemia also increases ROS generation. Environmental factors and adaptation to extreme weather disrupt the mitochondrial membrane fluidity and transfer of electrons leading to ROS generation. Vitamins C and E or polyphenols can act as prooxidants under certain conditions (, , , , -).

Prooxidant Activities of Antioxidants

Surprisingly, some popular antioxidants have been reported to have prooxidant behavior. At least three factors can influence the function of an antioxidant transforming it to a prooxidant; these factors include the presence of metal ions, the concentration of the antioxidant in matrix environments and its redox potential (-).

Vitamin C is a potent antioxidant but it can intervene as a prooxidant depending on the dose. It can have an antioxidant effect in case of low dose (30-100 mg/kg body weight) and prooxidant effect in case of high dose (1000 mg/kg body weight) (-). The prooxidant effect of vitamin C also occurs when it combines with iron, reducing Fe3+ to Fe2+ or with copper reducing it from Cu2+ to Cu+39,40. The reduced transition metals in turn reduce hydrogen peroxide to hydroxyl radicals through Fenton reaction (, ). The supplementation of vitamin C and trolox (water-soluble analog of vitamin E) may result in lower normal biological response to free radicals and create an environment that is more sensitive to oxidation. These antioxidants might provoke mild oxidative stress due to their prooxidative properties ().

Alpha-tocopherol is also known as a potent antioxidant and harmful prooxidant in high concentrations. When reacting with ROS, it becomes a radical itself, and if there is not enough vitamin C for its regeneration, it remains in the reactive state (, ).

The prooxidant activity of beta-carotene depends on its interaction with biological membranes and the presence of co-antioxidants such as vitamin C. At higher oxygen tension, beta-carotene loses its effectiveness as antioxidant. A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed increased mortality rates after prolonged use of supplements with beta-carotene, vitamin A and vitamin E ().

Even flavonoids have been reported to act as prooxidants in the systems that contain transition metals (). Flavonoids, such as quercetin and kaempferol, induce DNA damage and lipid peroxidation in the presence of the transition metal.

Phenolics can also display prooxidant effects, especially in a system containing redox-active metals. The presence of iron or copper catalyzes their redox cycling and may lead to the formation of phenolic radicals which damage lipids and DNA (, ).

Should Supplements of Antioxidants Be Taken?

Diseases that have positive correlation to oxidative stress

The oxidative stress of biological systems is defined as the harmful effect of ROS causing biological damage. It is evident when there is an excessive production of ROS or a deficiency of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants (-).

The most sensitive organ to ROS damage is the brain because of the low total antioxidant capacity, high consumption of total body oxygen (20%), high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and low levels of iron-binding proteins (ferritin). These characteristics associate neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases) with oxidative stress (, ).

The relationship between oxidative stress and immune function of the body is well established. Oxidative stress can induce production of free radicals that can modify proteins. Alterations in self-antigens (modified proteins) can instigate the process of autoimmune diseases. There are different examples of autoimmune diseases resulting from oxidative damage to self-proteins, namely, systemic lupus erythematosus (60 kD Ro ribonucleoprotein) () and diabetes mellitus (high molecular weight complexes of glutamic acid decarboxylase) ().

Beatty et al. () demonstrated the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Oxidative stress is also reported to be the cause of induction of allergies; it has been revealed that reduced NADPH oxidase is present in pollen grains and can lead to induction of airway associated oxidative stress. Such oxidative damage is responsible for developing allergic inflammation in sensitized animals.

Different research studies demonstrated the neoplastic effect of persistent oxidative stress. Oxidative stress due to altered inflammation acts as a precancerous state of host cells leading to the initiation of genetic mutations, genetic errors, epigenetic abnormalities, wrongly coded genome, and impaired regulation of gene expression (, ).

According to multiple studies (-), oxidative stress is also linked to atherosclerosis (because of the reduced NADPH oxidase system), glomerular nephropathy (because of glutathione transferase kappa deficiency) and osteoarthritis (radical oxygen species). Filippo et al. () claim that oxidative stress is the leading cause of acute myocardial infarction in diabetics.

Effect of antioxidants on health and disease

In the last decades, antioxidants have been extensively studied (, , , ) and proposed as supplementation in reducing the incidence of cancer and ischemic vascular disease (, ). Unfortunately, the value of antioxidant strategies seems debatable since supplementation studies showed unreliable and ambiguous outcomes. According to the National Institutes of Health (), most of the data examined on using antioxidants fail to give reliable evidence as to beneficial effects on health when the supplements are taken either singly, in pairs, or in combinations of three or more.

The controversy around dietary antioxidants is due to their capacity to act as prooxidants depending on their concentration and the nature of surrounding molecules (). Schafer () confirmed this hypothesis in his study, which revealed an unexpected mechanism of cell survival in unnatural matrix environments by antioxidant restoration, which might be disrupted with supplementation of only one antioxidant leading to alteration of the apoptosis reaction. Additionally, ingestion of synthetic antioxidants can lower the synthesis of endogenous antioxidants, as reported in subjects performing sports activity. For example, antioxidant therapy (using different synthetic antioxidants such as vitamins A, C, E, and resveratrol) can even prevent the beneficial effects obtained with regular exercise, most probably due to the reduced mitochondrial biogenesis, which is stimulated by excessive ROS formation. Additionally, the imbalance caused by reducing ROS and/or increasing the antioxidant capacity affects cellular signaling and thus could mitigate the training benefits (, ).

Antioxidants may thus have contradictory influence on cancer development; they can prevent oxidative stress to DNA and then stop tumorigenesis; they also can allow survival of damaged cells and then promote tumorigenesis (, ). The research by Chen and Guarente () demonstrated correlation between metastasis of breast cancer cells to the brain and enhanced pentose phosphate pathway flux with an increased antioxidant capacity.

Antioxidants also failed to provide satisfying protection to the brain because of the blood brain barrier (). Some authors found resveratrol to be identified as a natural therapeutic agent with pharmacological potential against a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and alcohol-induced neurodegenerative disorder (). It was found () that in vitro polymerization of the β-amyloid peptide was markedly inhibited by resveratrol, which stimulates the proteosomal degradation of the β-amyloid peptides (). A limitation regarding the results of this research is that cell cultures, which react to antioxidants in vitro, are leading to erroneous interpretation and are usually overlooked by peer-review. Direct investigation of oxidative damage ramifications and prooxidant effect on humans due to their molecular and physiological complexity is of outmost importance.

Findings from rodents and worms to humans should be approached with caution. Laboratory mice are more sensitive to dietary antioxidants than humans.

Different routes of antioxidant administration may cause different metabolic interactions; for example, the per os route can be neutralized during transit to the intestine, where the liver sequestrates some amounts, so that the bioavailability of the original antioxidant for other tissues is reduced (reduced glutathione). Flavonoids are markedly biotransformed by intestinal microorganisms and therefore aglycone bioflavonoids, which are frequently introduced in many promising in vitro research studies, pass through the intestinal absorption barrier and enter the bloodstream at a defined molar concentration range (, ).

The amount of daily intake of synthetic antioxidants presents another major limitation. Some scientists and pharmacological companies suggest consuming larger amounts of antioxidants to effectively fight oxidative stress. It should be emphasized that the recommended daily intake (RDA) values of vitamins should not be exceeded, although there have been arguments that RDA levels are too low ().

In the Cochrane systematic reviews on antioxidants and all cause mortality, there was no evidence to support antioxidant supplements for primary or secondary prevention. Beta-carotene and vitamin E seem to increase mortality, and so may higher doses of vitamin A. Antioxidant supplements need to be considered as medicinal products and should undergo sufficient evaluation before marketing ().

Does antioxidant supplementation make sense?

The contemporary human population presents an increase in the senior fraction of people (65 years and older) that have an importance from the health point of view. Because of this demographic fact, nutrition and dietary supplementation with antioxidants has become very popular. Nevertheless, until now, no clinical studies and treatment with synthetic antioxidants have been able to produce significant desired results (-). Selman et al. () proposed some possible explanations for the inability of antioxidants to ensure longevity in animals and to reduce the incidence of disease in humans. In vivo, some antioxidants may act more as pro-oxidants than antioxidants as they possibly constrain higher activation of the defense system to keep the status quo (). The knowledge of the mechanisms of bioavailability, biotransformation, and interaction of antioxidant supplements is yet insufficient.

However, the use of antioxidant supplements should be limited only to the cases in which oxidative stress is well documented. Before starting any supplementation, it is necessary to measure oxidative stress and to identify and eliminate the possible sources of free radicals and thus increased oxidative stress. The institutionalized seniors often show signs of malnutrition; previous research shows that the elderly are at a particular risk due to deficiency of vitamins (B12 and D) and trace elements (). They can even increase their need for nutrient intake because of changes in the absorptive and metabolic capacity. For vulnerable groups, different supplements such as folic acid for women of childbearing age, iron supplements for women with heavy menstrual flow, vitamin D for young children, pregnant women and older (housebound) people are recommended. Moreover, magnesium could be useful in the management of hypertensive heart disease (), Alzheimer’s () and osteoporosis (). Omega-3 fatty acids presumably lower the risk of cardiovascular disease () and cancer (). Garlic extracts fight viral and bacterial infections and prevent chronic inflammation ().

People who consume fruits and vegetables, which are a rich source of antioxidants, are at a lower risk of cardiovascular and some neurological diseases (). Evidence shows that some varieties of vegetables and all kinds of fruit have anticarcinogenic properties. This indicates that some other substances in fruits and vegetables (flavonoids), or a mixture of substances (synergism) might add to the improved cardiovascular health and decreased cancer incidence, as it was observed in the individuals consuming more of such foods ().

Discussion

The most recent epidemiological data on the treatment with synthetic antioxidants indicate that the results were ambiguous and even misleading; they were found to be toxic, neutral, and even beneficial. It was only scientifically evidenced that supplementation with antioxidants should be limited only to cases where oxidative stress has been identified, which is often the case in specific population groups such as postmenopausal women, the elderly, infants, workers exposed to environmental pollutants, and the obese. Meanwhile, diets rich in fruits and vegetables, which are rich sources of antioxidants, are beneficial for one’s health and act as anti-aging agents.