Literature DB >> 32593529

Modified Apical Dissection and Lateral Prostatic Fascia Preservation Improves Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

Marcio Covas Moschovas1, Seetharam Bhat1, Fikret Fatih Onol2, Travis Rogers1, Shannon Roof1, Elio Mazzone3, Alexandre Mottrie4, Vipul Patel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early recovery of continence and potency after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) still remains a challenge.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of our modified apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation (mod-RALP) technique on early functional outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Among 2168 patients who underwent RALP between 2017 and 2019, 104 received a mod-RALP, and for the purposes of this study they were propensity score (PS) matched with a control group of conventional RALP cases based on preoperative and histological characteristics. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: In the mod-RALP technique, significant dissection of the apical complex was avoided with maximized preservation of periurethral tissue around the urethral stump. Nerve sparing was also modified with intrafascial dissection inside of the lateral fascia, leaving the lateral tissue including the neurovascular bundle (NVB) untouched and covered. MEASUREMENTS: The mod-RALP and conventional RALP groups were compared for continence and potency recovery at 1 and 6 wk postoperatively, as well as at 3, 6, and 12 mo. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify survival estimations and their predictors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The mod-RALP technique resulted in faster continence (mean 46 vs 70 d) and potency (mean 74 vs 118 d, p <  0.05 for both) recovery. Functional recovery rates at postoperative follow-up were significantly higher in the mod-RALP group at all time points within the first 6 mo following surgery. Multivariate analyses revealed age, baseline functional status, surgical technique, and lymph node dissection as independent predictors of early functional recovery. This study is limited by its retrospective design and small size of the study groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results with a modified technique intended to better preserve the apical complex and NVBs suggest earlier recovery of urinary continence and sexual function. These results should be tested with future randomized studies. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We report a modified approach to apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy that resulted in earlier continence and potency recovery as compared with our conventional technique.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continence; Potency; Prostate cancer; Recovery; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32593529     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

1.  Floating docking technique: a simple modification to improve the working space of the instruments during single-port robotic surgery.

Authors:  Louis Lenfant; Soodong Kim; Alireza Aminsharifi; Guilherme Sawczyn; Jihad Kaouk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Does type of robotic platform make a difference in the final cost of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Talia Helman; Seetharam Bhat; Marco Sandri; Travis Rogers; Jonathan Noel; Sunil Reddy; Cathy Corder; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-28

3.  [Relationship between prostate apex depth and early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  F Zhang; X J Huang; B Yang; Y Yan; C Liu; S D Zhang; Y Huang; L L Ma
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-08-18

4.  Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: outcomes from 500 consecutive cases in the UK.

Authors:  Jim Adshead; Nikhil Vasdev; Jonathan Noël; Neil H Spencer; Siya Lodia; Seiver Karim; Surina Taneja; Darius Moghanchizadeh; Arvind Nayak; Ashwin Tamhankar; Seema Angra; Rajiv Swamy; Samita Agarwal; Ashish Narula; Tim Lane
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-10-30

5.  A Combined Technology to Protect the Anatomic Integrity of Distal Urethral Sphincter Complex in Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Continence Recovery Without Sacrifice of Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Ao Liu; Yi Gao; Hai Huang; Xiaoqun Yang; Wenhao Lin; Lu Chen; Danfeng Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Maneuvers to Attenuate Erectile Dysfunction: Technical Description and Video Compilation.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Keith Kowalczyk; Marcio Covas Moschovas; Vanessa Dudley; Andrew J Hung; Jonathan E Shoag; Vipul Patel; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: how I do it after 15.000 cases.

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Vipul Patel
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 8.  Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases.

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Vipul Patel
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Patient surgical satisfaction after da Vinci® single-port and multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Noël; Marcio Covas Moschovas; Marco Sandri; Seetharam Bhat; Travis Rogers; Sunil Reddy; Cathy Corder; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joel E Rosenberg; Jae Hung Jung; Zach Edgerton; Hunju Lee; Solam Lee; Caitlin J Bakker; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.