Literature DB >> 29339017

Reliability and agreement on embryo assessment: 5 years of an external quality control programme.

Luis Martínez-Granados1, María Serrano2, Antonio González-Utor3, Nereyda Ortiz4, Vicente Badajoz5, María Luisa López-Regalado6, Montserrat Boada7, Jose A Castilla8.   

Abstract

An external quality-control programme for morphology-based embryo quality assessment, incorporating a standardized embryo grading scheme, was evaluated over a period of 5 years to determine levels of inter-observer reliability and agreement between practising clinical embryologists at IVF centres and the opinions of a panel of experts. Following Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies, the Gwet index and proportion of positive (Ppos) and negative agreement were calculated. For embryo morphology assessment, a substantial degree of reliability was measured between the centres and the panel of experts (Gwet index: 0.76; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.84). The agreement was higher for good- versus poor-quality embryos. When multinucleation or vacuoles were observed, low levels of reliability were obtained (Ppos: 0.56 and 0.43, respectively). In blastocysts, the characteristic that presented the largest discrepancy was that related to the inner cell mass. In decisions about the final disposition of the embryo, reliability between centre and the panel of experts was moderate (Gwet index: 0.51; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.60). In conclusion, the ability of clinical embryologists to evaluate the presence of multinucleation and vacuoles in the early cleavage embryo, and to determine the category of the inner cell mass in blastocysts, needs to be improved.
Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART; Agreement; Embryo assessment; IVF; Quality control; Reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29339017     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  4 in total

1.  Do patient factors influence embryologists' decisions to freeze borderline blastocysts?

Authors:  T Burns; E R Hammond; L Cree; D E Morbeck; N S Consedine
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The Valuable Reference of Live Birth Rate in the Single Vitrified-Warmed BB/BC/CB Blastocyst Transfer: The Cleavage-Stage Embryo Quality and Embryo Development Speed.

Authors:  Xi Shen; Hui Long; Hongyuan Gao; Wenya Guo; Yating Xie; Di Chen; Yanyan Cong; Yun Wang; Dongying Li; Jiqiang Si; Leiwen Zhao; Qifeng Lyu; Yanping Kuang; Li Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 3.  Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection.

Authors:  Kersti Lundin; Hannah Park
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 4.  Reporting on the Value of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting the Optimal Embryo for Transfer: A Systematic Review including Data Synthesis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Agni Pantou; Georgia Kokkini; Anna Trypidi; Polina Giannelou; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Irene Angeli; Terpsithea Vaxevanoglou; Konstantinos Pantos; Mara Simopoulou
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-03-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.