| Literature DB >> 32591595 |
Stephan Payr1,2, Tim Schuseil3, Marina Unger3, Claudine Seeliger3, Thomas Tiefenboeck4, Elizabeth R Balmayor3,5, Martijn van Griensven3,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32591595 PMCID: PMC7319953 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67254-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Human primers used for the quantitative PCR evaluation. OC = osteocalcin, OP = osteopontin, ALP = alkaline phosphatase, OPG = osteoprotegerin, Col1=collagen type 1〈1, ®-Tub = ®-tubulin.
| Gene | Forward primer 5ʹ | Reverse primer 5ʹ | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|
| OC | CCAGCGGTGCAGAGTCCAGC | GACACCCTAGACCGGGCCGT | NM-199173.3 |
| OP | CTCCATTGACTCGAACGACTC | CGTCTGTAGCATCAGGGTACTG | NM-000582 |
| ALP | CTGGGCTCCAGGGATAAAGC | TCAGTGTCTCTTGCGCTTGG | NM-000478.4 |
| OPG | CCGGAAACAGTGAATCAACTC | AGGTTAGCATGTCCAATGTG | NM-002546.3 |
| COL1 | AGCGGACGCTAACCCCCTCC | CAGACGGGACAGCACTCGCC | NM-000088.3 |
| β-Tub | GAGGGCGAGGACGAGGCTTA | TCTAACAGAGGCAAAACTGAGCACC | NM-001069.2 |
Figure 1Effect of age of human AMSCs and the in vitro cultivation geometry on alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. The observation period was up to 14 days. Young cells: mean age = 37.5 years ± 8.6. Old cells: means age = 75.8 years ± 9.2. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Comparison of the mineralization potential of young versus old AMSCs after an observation period of 14 days. Both cells were cultivated in monolayer as well as 3D cultivation. Relative alkaline phosphatase (ALP) gene expression of cultivated AMSCs. Comparison of 2D versus 3D cultures and of young versus old AMSCs after an observation period of 7 days.
Figure 2Relative gene expression of osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteoclacin (OC), osteopontin (OP) and collagen type 1 (Col1) on cultivated AMSCs for a period of up to 7 days. Comparison of 2D versus 3D cultures and of young (mean age = 37.5 years ± 8.6) versus old (75.8 years ± 9.2) cells. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.