Literature DB >> 32590231

The recovery model in chronic mental health: A community-based investigation of social identity processes.

Tegan Cruwys1, Bridie Stewart2, Lisa Buckley3, James Gumley2, Brett Scholz4.   

Abstract

The recovery model has been enormously influential in shaping mental health services globally over the last two decades. However, empirical research on its outcomes and psychological mechanisms is sparse. This community-based case study utilised both semi-structured qualitative interviews and quantitative survey methods to investigate perceptions of recovery, identity, and wellbeing among people with chronic and severe mental illness attending recovery-oriented support groups. Consistent with a social identity approach and the recovery model, to the extent that people identified as "in recovery", they reported better recovery outcomes (e.g., sense of purpose) and reduced psychological distress. Furthermore, recovery identity more strongly predicted recovery outcomes than it did psychological distress. Both the quantitative and qualitative data pointed to collective efficacy (i.e., group-based empowerment) as a key mediator of these outcomes. These findings are consistent with the recovery model and speak to the utility of a social identity approach for conceptualizing its efficacy. However, these findings also speak to the need for further evaluation of how and when recovery-oriented mental health services achieve their intended goal of improving quality of life for people with chronic and severe mental illness.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic mental illness; Collective efficacy; Mental health recovery; Social identity; Well-being

Year:  2020        PMID: 32590231     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  5 in total

1.  How and why does the disease progress? A qualitative investigation of the transition into long-standing anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Catherine Broomfield; Paul Rhodes; Stephen Touyz
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2021-08-17

2.  Improvements in Hope, Engagement and Functioning Following a Recovery-Focused Sub-Acute Inpatient Intervention: a Six-Month Evaluation.

Authors:  Tanya M Hollier; Barry G Frost; Patricia T Michie; Terry J Lewin; Ketrina A Sly
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2021-06-14

3.  System-level barriers to personal recovery in mental health: qualitative analysis of co-productive narrative dialogues between users and professionals.

Authors:  Miharu Nakanishi; George Kurokawa; Junko Niimura; Atsushi Nishida; Geoff Shepherd; Syudo Yamasaki
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2021-01-07

4.  Double jeopardy: How lower levels of support during COVID-19 exacerbated the relationship between loneliness and distress.

Authors:  Sarah V Bentley; Tarli Young; Belén Álvarez; Jolanda Jetten; Catherine Haslam; Tegan Cruwys; Bruno Gabriel Salvador Casara; Charlie R Crimston; Michael Dare; Octavia Ionescu; Henning Krug; Hema Preya Selvanathan; Porntida Tanjitpiyanond; Niklas K Steffens; Zhechen Wang; Susilo Wibisono
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26

5.  Content analysis of identity challenges in patients with haemophilia: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Roya Dolatkhah; Reza Shabanloei; Hossein Ebrahimi; Mostafa Ghasempour
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-01-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.