Literature DB >> 34125366

Improvements in Hope, Engagement and Functioning Following a Recovery-Focused Sub-Acute Inpatient Intervention: a Six-Month Evaluation.

Tanya M Hollier1,2, Barry G Frost1,3,4, Patricia T Michie1,3, Terry J Lewin2,3,4,5, Ketrina A Sly6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

Few studies have examined the post-discharge benefits associated with recover-oriented programs delivered in inpatient and sub-acute mental health settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term outcomes of a 6-week sub-acute inpatient intervention program for 27 service users with a diagnosis of serious mental illness (mean age = 33.22 years, 70.4% with a psychosis diagnosis). Recovery data were collected on admission, at discharge, and at 3- and 6-months post-discharge using self-report, collaborative and clinical measures. The three clinician-rated measures (assessing therapeutic engagement, functioning, and life skills) revealed linear improvements from admission to 6-month follow-up (with mean z-change ranging from 0.72 to 1.35), as did the self-reported social connection measure (Mental Health Recovery Star, MHRS; mean z-change: 1.05). There were also curvilinear improvements in self-determination and self-reported MHRS symptom management and functioning scores; however, only modest changes were detected in hope (Herth Hope Index) and MHRS self-belief scores. Change scores based on self-reported and clinician-rated measures tended to be uncorrelated. An exploration of client-level outcomes revealed three recovery trajectory subgroups: transient (21.7%), gradual (34.8%), or sustained (43.5%) improvement; with members of the latter group tending to have longer illness durations. The study's findings are encouraging, to the extent that they demonstrate recovery-focused sub-acute inpatient programs can promote clinical recovery and aspects of personal recovery. However, they also suggest that recovery perspectives differ between clients and clinicians, and that far more work is required to understand the psychological factors that generate and sustain the hope that recovery is possible.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functioning; Hopefulness; Mental health services; Post-discharge recovery; Psychiatric rehabilitation; Self-determination; Serious mental illness; Sub-acute; Therapeutic processes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34125366     DOI: 10.1007/s11126-021-09934-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  52 in total

1.  What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication.

Authors:  N Jacobson; D Greenley
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: towards an empirically validated stage model.

Authors:  Retta Andresen; Lindsay Oades; Peter Caputi
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.744

3.  What does recovery mean in practice? A qualitative analysis of international recovery-oriented practice guidance.

Authors:  Clair Le Boutillier; Mary Leamy; Victoria J Bird; Larry Davidson; Julie Williams; Mike Slade
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Rethinking social recovery in schizophrenia: what a capabilities approach might offer.

Authors:  Kim Hopper
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Conceptualizations, assessments, and implications of personal recovery in mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jaap van Weeghel; Catherine van Zelst; Dienke Boertien; Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 6.  International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review.

Authors:  M Slade; M Leamy; F Bacon; M Janosik; C Le Boutillier; J Williams; V Bird
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 7.  What we talk about when we talk about recovery: a systematic review and best-fit framework synthesis of qualitative literature.

Authors:  Simon Robertson Stuart; Louise Tansey; Ethel Quayle
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 8.  Illness management and recovery: a review of the research.

Authors:  Kim T Mueser; Patrick W Corrigan; David W Hilton; Beth Tanzman; Annette Schaub; Susan Gingerich; Susan M Essock; Nick Tarrier; Bodie Morey; Suzanne Vogel-Scibilia; Marvin I Herz
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Fit for purpose? Validation of a conceptual framework for personal recovery with current mental health consumers.

Authors:  Victoria Bird; Mary Leamy; Jerry Tew; Clair Le Boutillier; Julie Williams; Mike Slade
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 5.744

Review 10.  Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Mary Leamy; Victoria Bird; Clair Le Boutillier; Julie Williams; Mike Slade
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.