Literature DB >> 32589275

Engaging Stakeholders in the Design and Conduct of Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias.

Jill Harrison1, Katie Maslow2, Ellen Tambor3, Louise Phillips4, Lori Frank5, Laurie Herndon6, Gary Epstein-Lubow1,7,8.   

Abstract

Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) of nondrug interventions for Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease-related dementias (AD/ADRD) are conducted in real-world clinical settings and designed to generate an evidence base to inform clinical and policy decisions about care for this vulnerable population. The ePCTs exist within a complex ecosystem of relationships between researchers, payors, policymakers, healthcare systems, direct care staff, advocacy groups, families, caregivers, and people living with dementia (PLWD). Because the rapid increase of the number of Americans with AD/ADRD outpaces curative treatments, there is an urgent need to mobilize the power of these relationships to improve dementia care and address a mounting public health crisis. Stakeholder engagement in ePCTs is essential to generate research questions, establish the relevancy of trials to the intended end users, and understand the factors that influence dissemination and implementation in real-world clinical settings. The process of including stakeholders in ePCTs for dementia is similar to stakeholder engagement in ePCTs for other diseases and conditions; however, the unique nature of embedded research, prevalence of caregiver and provider burden, and the progressive worsening of cognitive impairment in PLWD must be approached with additional strategies. This article presents key considerations of stakeholder engagement for ePCTs in AD/ADRD and main activities of the stakeholder engagement team in the National Institute on Aging IMPACT Collaboratory to move the field forward. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:S62-S67, 2020.
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dementia; pragmatic clinical trials; stakeholder engagement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32589275      PMCID: PMC7375262          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  18 in total

1.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.

Authors:  Sean R Tunis; Daniel B Stryer; Carolyn M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The Experiences of Persons Living with Dementia Planning for a Dementia Research Meeting. Lessons Learned From the National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons With Dementia and Their Caregivers.

Authors:  Lori Frank; Emily Shubeck; Melanie Schicker; Teresa Webb; Katie Maslow; Laura Gitlin; Cynthia Huling Hummel; Edward K Kaplan; Brian LeBlanc; Myriam Marquez; Brenda P Nicholson; Greg O'Brien; Louise Phillips; Brian Van Buren; Gary Epstein-Lubow
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 3.  Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice.

Authors:  Laura Esmail; Emily Moore; Alison Rein
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Sean Grant; Vivian Welch; Jennifer Petkovic; Joseph Selby; Sally Crowe; Anneliese Synnot; Regina Greer-Smith; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Ellen Tambor; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Melissa Fuster; Tully Saunders; Kamal Patel; John B Wong; Laurel K Leslie; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.

Authors:  Nathan D Shippee; Juan Pablo Domecq Garces; Gabriela J Prutsky Lopez; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Mohammed Nabhan; Juan P Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Authors:  Laura Forsythe; Andrea Heckert; Mary Kay Margolis; Suzanne Schrandt; Lori Frank
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The Promise of Pragmatic Clinical Trials Embedded in Learning Health Systems.

Authors:  Leah Tuzzio; Eric B Larson
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2019-04-03

9.  Readiness assessment for pragmatic trials (RAPT): a model to assess the readiness of an intervention for testing in a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Rosa R Baier; Eric Jutkowitz; Susan L Mitchell; Ellen McCreedy; Vincent Mor
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Alzheimer Europe's position on involving people with dementia in research through PPI (patient and public involvement).

Authors:  Dianne Gove; Ana Diaz-Ponce; Jean Georges; Esme Moniz-Cook; Gail Mountain; Rabih Chattat; Laila Øksnebjerg
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.658

View more
  1 in total

1.  Engaging multi-stakeholder perspectives to identify dementia care research priorities.

Authors:  Neela K Patel; Sara S Masoud; Kylie Meyer; Angelica V Davila; Sheran Rivette; Ashlie A Glassner; Deborah James; Carole L White
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.