Literature DB >> 32588746

Comparison of early and on-demand maternal feeding after Caesarean delivery: a prospective randomised trial.

Esra Ozbasli1, Ozguc Takmaz1, Faruk Suat Dede1, Mete Gungor1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare early and on-demand maternal feeding after Caesarean delivery in terms of gastrointestinal complaints and patient satisfaction.
METHODS: A total of 262 women with uncomplicated singleton term pregnancies who underwent a Caesarean section under regional anaesthesia were randomised to a soft food diet served at Postoperative Hour 2 (early feeding group) or eating whenever they wanted to upon return to the ward (on-demand group). Patient satisfaction scores at the time of discharge and gastrointestinal complaints were compared.
RESULTS: The fed-early group comprised 133 (50.8%) women and the on-demand group comprised 129 (49.2%) women. Major characteristics and surgical procedures were comparable between the two groups. No significant between-group differences in demographic criteria or surgical procedures were evident (p > 0.05). The mean time to the first feeding was 120.00 ± 00.00 minutes for the early feeding group as compared to 236.59 ± 107.74 minutes for the on-demand feeding group (p = 0.001). Satisfaction levels did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.366). Duration to first breastfeeding, analgesia on the ward, passage of flatus, defecation, mobilisation and urination after catheter removal did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Early initiation of solid food in low-risk women after Caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia was associated with high satisfaction and did not increase gastrointestinal complaints. We suggest having flexibility in terms of postoperative feeding time. This may shorten hospitalisation time and reduce hospitalisation costs. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean delivery; gastrointestinal complaints; patient satisfaction; postoperative feeding; prospective randomised trial

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32588746      PMCID: PMC8804403          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2020096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  13 in total

1.  Reducing postoperative pain, narcotics, and length of hospitalization.

Authors:  G Moss; M E Regal; L Lichtig
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Krishna K Varadhan; Keith R Neal; Cornelius H C Dejong; Kenneth C H Fearon; Olle Ljungqvist; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 3.  Early versus delayed oral feeding for patients after cesarean.

Authors:  Jin Guo; Shuyu Long; Huafeng Li; Jinfeng Luo; Dongmei Han; Teng He
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  A randomised controlled trial on beneficial effects of early feeding post-Caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  W H L Teoh; M K Shah; C L Mah
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  The effect of early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding on women's satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  G H Izbizky; L Minig; M A Sebastiani; L Otaño
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Role of opiate receptors in the regulation of colonic transit.

Authors:  P N Kaufman; B Krevsky; L S Malmud; A H Maurer; M B Somers; J A Siegel; R S Fisher
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Immediate compared with on-demand maternal full feeding after planned caesarean delivery: a randomised trial.

Authors:  P C Tan; M M Alzergany; A-S Adlan; M A Noor Azmi; S Z Omar
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study.

Authors:  Ilse Delbaere; Hendrik Cammu; Evelyne Martens; Inge Tency; Guy Martens; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Early compared with delayed oral fluids and food after caesarean section.

Authors:  L Mangesi; G J Hofmeyr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

10.  Women's satisfaction in early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding: A one-blind randomized controlled trial study.

Authors:  Shahnaz Barat; Sedigheh Esmaeilzadeh; Masoumeh Golsorkhtabaramiri; Soraya Khafri; Maryam Moradi Recabdarkolaee
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.