| Literature DB >> 32588559 |
Mariem Rouatbi1, Rihab Romdhane1, Faten Bouaicha1, Rahma Saddem1, Limam Sassi1, Mokhtar Dhibi1, Mourad Rekik2, Aynalem Haile3, Joram M Mwacharo3, Barbara Rischkowsky3, Mohamed Aziz Darghouth1, Mohamed Gharbi1.
Abstract
In Tunisia, livestock plays an important role in the economy; unfortunately, Tunisian sheep population faces several health challenges. The aim of this trial was to study phenotypic variability of four local sheep breeds and strains to abomasum nematodes infection and to Babesia/Theileria parasites. Faeces, blood and abomasum contents were collected from 310 sheep slaughtered in eight commercial slaughterhouses across North Tunisia. Haematological and biochemical parameters were assessed. DNA was extracted and catch-all primers were used to detect both Theileria spp. and Babesia spp. DNA. Faecal egg counts (FEC) was quantitatively assessed using simple flotation technique followed by McMaster technique. Male and female worms were collected from all abomasum contents and counted under a stereomicroscope. The percentage of faeces samples positive for GIN's eggs was 30.82%. After worms' recovery, the infection prevalence was estimated to 75.90%. The overall infection prevalence by Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. was 4.21%. The dispersion of observations plots obtained by principal component analysis (PCA) showed two clusters of individuals. The first cluster contains animals having positive Babesia/Theileria PCR, presence of nematodes in the abomasum contents and relatively low total worm count (TWC < 500) expect one animal which was found bearing high TWC (>500). In this same group, with a suspected form of resistance, animals showed normal values of albumin and normal haematological parameters (red blood cell count [RBC], haemoglobin [Hb] and packed cell volume [PCV]). The second cluster represents all the other observations in which subgroups of animals were distinguished on the basis of their potential resistance to abomasum nematodes. Multiple correlations showed significant positive correlations between RBC/Hb, RBC/PCV, PCV/Hb and FEC/TWC. Significant negative correlations were observed between TWC/RBC and TWC/Hb. It is concluded that the phenotypic variability among local sheep breeds is essential for more advanced genetic and genomic studies.Entities:
Keywords: Tunisia; abomasum nematodes; breeds; phenotypes; sheep
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32588559 PMCID: PMC7738738 DOI: 10.1002/vms3.310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Sci ISSN: 2053-1095
FIGURE 1Districts delineating the sampling area in North Tunisia
Characteristics of the studied areas , ,
| Location | District | Localization | Mean annual rainfall (mm) | Mean annual temperature (°C) | Mean temperature during winter (°C) | Mean temperature during summer (°C) | GPS coordinates | Total number of sheep heads (2015–2016) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ariana | Ariana | North‐east | 449 | 18.0 | 11.3 | 24.9 | 36°51′N 10°11′E | 32,400 |
| Beja | Beja | North‐west | 662 | 17.7 | 9.9 | 26.1 | 36°44′N 09°11′E | 357,560 |
| Bizerte | Bizerte | North | 527 | 18 | 11.6 | 24.5 | 37°16′N 9°52′E | 199,670 |
| Mateur | Bizerte | North | 539 | 18 | 11.2 | 25.1 | 37°02′N 9°39′E | 199,670 |
| Sajnène | Bizerte | North | 527 | 18 | 11.2 | 25.1 | 37°3'N 9°14'E | 199,670 |
| Jendouba | Jendouba | North‐west | 504 | 18 | 10.4 | 26.6 | 36°29′N 08°47′E | 232,550 |
| Tabarka | Jendouba | North‐west | 865 | 18.2 | 11.8 | 24.8 | 36°57′N 8°45′E | 232,550 |
| Tunis | Tunis | North‐east | 448 | 18.1 | 11.4 | 25.2 | 36°48′N 10°10′E | 18,880 |
Climatedata.org, 2018, URL: http://fr.climate‐data.org/.
Date and time.info, 2018, URL: http://dateandtime.info/.
Ministry of Agriculture, Water Resources and Fishing, Tunisia (2016). Official statistics of the Tunisian Ministry of Agriculture, Survey on agricultural season (Livestock), general administration of studies and agricultural development.
Characteristics of the sampled animals
| Parameter | Number of animals (%) |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 90 (29.03) |
| Female | 220 (70.97) |
| Breed | |
| Barbarine | 37 (11.94) |
| Cross breed | 142 (45.81) |
| Noire de Thibar | 59 (19.03) |
| Queue Fine de l’Ouest | 72 (23.23) |
| Location (district) | |
| Ariana (Ariana) | 34 (10.97) |
| Beja (Beja) | 54 (17.42) |
| Bizerte (Bizerte) | 29 (9.35) |
| Sajnène (Bizerte) | 40 (12.90) |
| Mateur (Bizerte) | 50 (16.13) |
| Jendouba (Jendouba) | 49 (15.81) |
| Tabarka (Jendouba) | 25 (8.06) |
| Tunis (Tunis) | 29 (9.35) |
| Age group (years) | |
| <1 | 243 (78.39) |
| ≥1 | 67 (21.61) |
| Overall | 310 |
Sheep haematological and biochemical threshold normal values
| Parameter | Threshold value |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Red blood cells (RBC) (1012/L) | 5.0–14.0 |
| Packed cell volume (PCV) (%) | 26.0–45.0 |
| Haemoglobin (Hb) (g/dL) | 9.0–15.5 |
| Biochemical parameters | |
| Albumin (g/L) | 24–30 |
| Total proteins (g/L) | 60–79 |
Blood and Radostitis, 1989.
Association between Babesia spp./Theileria spp. infection, faeces analyses for GIN and abomasum infected with worms in sheep and different parameters
| Parameter |
| GIN’s eggs in faeces | Presence of nematodes in the abomasum contents | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive/examined (%) |
| Positive/examined (%) |
| Positive/examined (%) |
| |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 2/90 (2.22 ± 1.55) | .26 | 21/85 (24.71 ± 4.68) | .14 | 68/90 (75.56 ± 4.53) | .9 |
| Female | 11/219 (5.02 ± 1.48) | 69/207 (33.33 ± 3.28) | 165/217 (76.04 ± 2.90) | |||
| Breed | ||||||
| Barbarine | 1/37 (2.70 ± 2.67) | .95 | 20/36 (55.56 ± 8.28) | .047 | 32/37 (86.49 ± 5.62) | .03 |
|
Cross breed Noire de Thibar Queue Fine de l’Ouest |
6/142 (4.23 ± 1.69) 3/59 (5.08 ± 2.86) 3/71 (4.23 ± 2.39) |
34/137 (24.82 ± 3.69) 20/58 (34.48 ± 6.24) 16/61 (26.23 ± 5.63) |
112/139 (80.58 ± 3.36) 41/59 (69.49 ± 5.99) 48/72 (66.67 ± 5.56) | |||
| Location (district) | ||||||
| Ariana (Ariana) | 0/33 (0) | .64 | 6/29 (20.69 ± 7.52) | <.001 | 23/34 (67.65 ± 8.02) | .002 |
| Beja (Beja) | 3/54 (5.56 ± 3.12) | 28/50 (56.00 ± 7.02) | 48/52 (92.31 ± 3.70) | |||
|
Bizerte (Bizerte) Mateur (Bizerte) Sajnène (Bizerte) Jendouba (Jendouba) Tabarka (Jendouba) Tunis (Tunis) |
3/29 (10.34 ± 5.66) 2/50 (4.00 ± 2.77) 2/40 (5.00 ± 3.45) 1/49 (2.04 ± 2.02) 1/25 (4.00 ± 3.92) 1/29 (3.45 ± 3.39) |
10/29 (34.48 ± 8.83) 6/49 (12.24 ± 4.68) 10/39 (25.64 ± 6.99) 9/46 (19.57 ± 5.85) 14/24 (58.33 ± 10.06) 7/26 (26.92 ± 8.70) |
24/29 (82.76 ± 7.01) 35/50 (70 ± 6.48) 25/39 (64.10 ± 7.68) 36/49 (73.47 ± 6.31) 24/25 (96 ± 3.92) 18/29 (62.07 ± 9.01) | |||
| Age group (years) | ||||||
| <1 | 10/242 (4.13 ± 1.28) | .9 | 58/227 (25.55 ± 2.89) | .001 | 175/240 (72.92 ± 2.87) |
|
| ≥1 | 3/67 (4.48 ± 2.53) | 32/65 (49.23 ± 6.20) | 58/67 (86.57 ± 4.17) | |||
| Overall | 13/309 (4.21 ± 1.14) | 90/292 (30.82 ± 2.70) | 233/307 (75.90 ± 2.44) | |||
Abbreviations: GIN, gastrointestinal nematodes; p, probability.
Significant (.001 ≤ p ≤ .05);
Highly significant (p < .001).
FIGURE 2Principal component analysis of different risk factors. Component plot: haematological parameters (RBC, Hb and PCV) positively correlated with component 1 and the result of PCR for (BAB_THE) Babesia/Theileria, (abomasum content) positive abomasum content for nematodes and (ALB) albumin positively correlated with component 2
FIGURE 3Dispersion of observations plots for Principal component analysis. There are 2 clusters of sheep. Cluster one (red circle): sheep with positive Babesia/Theileria PCR, positive abomasum content for nematodes, with high values of albumin and normal values of haematological parameters (RBC, Hb and PCV). Cluster two (green circle): all other sheep
Description of sheep clusters obtained by principal component analysis (PCA)
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Positive | 7/7 (100%) | 6/302 (2.01%) |
| Negative | 0/7 (0%) | 296/302 (97.99%) |
| Nematodes in the abomasum contents | ||
| Presence | 7/7 (100%) | 226/300 (75.76%) |
| Absence | 0/7 (0%) | 74/300 (24.24%) |
| Haematological parameters under threshold values | ||
| Red Blood Cells | 0/7 (0%) | 2/302 (0.33%) |
| Haemoglobin | 0/7 (0%) | 39/299 (12.84%) |
| Packed cell volume | 0/7 (0%) | 3/302 (1.00%) |
| Biochemical parameters under threshold values | ||
| Albumin | 0/7 (0%) | 149/295 (50.68%) |
| Total Proteins | 0/7 (0%) | 46/295 (16.10%) |
Characteristics of animals in the two clusters according to principal component analysis results
| Parameter | Cluster 1 ( |
| Cluster 2 ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1/307 (0.33%) |
| 88/307 (28.66%) |
|
| Female | 6/307 (1.95%) | 212/307 (69.06%) | ||
| Breed | ||||
| Barbarine | 0/307 (0%) | .16 | 36/307 (11.73%) |
|
| Cross breed | 4/307 (1.30%) | 137/307 (44.63%) | ||
| Noire de Thibar | 1/307 (0.33%) | 58/307 (18.89%) | ||
| Queue Fine de l’Ouest | 2/307 (0.65%) | 69/307 (22.48%) | ||
| Location (district) | ||||
| Ariana (Ariana) | 0/307 (0%) | .58 | 34/307 (11.07%) |
|
| Beja (Beja) | 2/307 (0.65%) | 51/307 (16.61%) | ||
| Bizerte (Bizerte) | 2/307 (0.65%) | 26/307 (8.47%) | ||
|
Mateur (Bizerte) Sajnène (Bizerte) Jendouba (Jendouba) |
0/307 (0%) 1/307 (0.33%) 1/307 (0.33%) |
50/307 (16.29%) 38/307 (12.38%) 48/307 (15.64%) | ||
|
Tabarka (Jendouba) Tunis (Tunis) |
1/307 (0.33%) 0/307 (0%) |
24/307 (7.82%) 29/307 (9.45%) | ||
| Age group (years) | ||||
| <1 | 4/307 (1.30%) | .70 | 236/307 (76.87%) |
|
| ≥1 | 3/307 (0.98%) | 64/307 (20.85%) | ||
In bolded characters, statistically significant.
Significant (.001 ≤ p ≤ .05).
Highly significant (p < .001).
Characteristics of animals in the subgroups of cluster 2
| Parameter |
Subgroup 1 ( |
|
Subgroup 2 ( |
|
Subgroup 3 ( |
|
Subgroup 4 ( |
|
Sub‐group 5 ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||||||||
| Male | 0/88 (0%) |
| 3/88 (3.41%) | .78 | 19/88 (21.59%) | .17 | 21/88 (23.86%) | .97 | 45/88 (51.14%) |
|
| Female | 12/212 (5.66%) | 6/212 (2.83%) | 62/212 (29.25%) | 51/212 (24.06%) | 81/212 (38.21%) | |||||
| Breed | ||||||||||
| Barbarine | 3/36 (8.33%) | .17 | 2/36 (5.56%) | .25 | 8/36 (22.22%) |
| 5/36 (13.89%) |
| 18/36 (50%) | .54 |
| Cross breed | 6/137 (4.38%) | 2/137 (1.46%) | 50/137 (36.50%) | 26/137 (18.98%) | 53/137 (38.69%) | |||||
| Noire de Thibar | 3/58 (5.17%) | 1/58 (1.72%) | 9/58 (15.52%) | 18/58 (31.03%) | 27/58 (46.55%) | |||||
| Queue Fine de l’Ouest | 0/69 (0%) | 4/69 (5.80%) | 14/69 (20.29%) | 23/69 (33.33%) | 28/69 (40.58%) | |||||
| Location (district) | ||||||||||
| Ariana (Ariana) | 0/34 (0%) |
| 1/34 (2.94%) | .98 | 12/34 (35.29%) |
| 11/34 (32.35%) |
| 10/34 (29.41%) |
|
| Beja (Beja) | 7/51 (13.73%) | 2/51 (3.92%) | 12/51 (23.53%) | 4/51 (7.84%) | 26/51 (50.98%) | |||||
| Bizerte (Bizerte) | 1/26 (3.85%) | 1/26 (3.85%) | 1/26 (3.85%) | 4/26 (15.38%) | 19/26 (73.08%) | |||||
|
Mateur (Bizerte) Sajnène (Bizerte) Jendouba (Jendouba) |
0/50 (0%) 0/38 (0%) 2/48 (4.17%) |
1/50 (2%) 1/38 (2.63%) 2/48 (4.17%) |
15/50 (30%) 2/38 (5.26%) 22/48 (45.83%) |
15/50 (30%) 13/38 (34.21%) 13/48 (27.08%) | 9/48 (18.75%) | |||||
|
Tabarka (Jendouba) Tunis (Tunis) |
2/24 (8.33%) 0/29 (0%) |
0/24 (0%) 1/29 (3.45%) |
15/24 (62.50%) 2/29 (6.90%) |
1/24 (4.17%) 11/29 (37.93%) | 19/50 (38%) | |||||
| Age group (years) | ||||||||||
| <1 | 8/236 (3.39%) | .3 | 6/236 (2.54%) | .37 | 63/236 (26.69%) | .81 | 63/236 (26.69%) |
| 22/38 (57.89%) | |
| ≥1 | 4/64 (6.25%) | 3/64 (4.69%) | 18/64 (28.13%) | 9/64 (14.06%) | 6/24 (25%) | |||||
In bolded characters, statistically significant at 5% threshold.
Significant (.001 ≤ p≤.05).
Highly significant (p < .001).
Matrix correlation between haematological and quantitative coproscopic parameters
| FEC | RBC | Hb | PCV | TWC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEC | Pearson correlation | 1 | ||||
|
| ||||||
| RBC | Pearson correlation | −.015 | 1 | |||
|
| .795 | |||||
| Hb | Pearson correlation | −.011 |
| 1 | ||
|
| .857 |
| ||||
| PCV | Pearson correlation | −.014 |
|
| 1 | |
|
| .814 |
|
| |||
| TWC | Pearson correlation |
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
In bolded characters, statistically significant at 5% threshold.
Abbreviations: FEC, faecal egg count; RBC, red blood cells; Hb, haemoglobinaemia; PCV, packed cell volume; TWC, total worm count; p, probability; t: tendency.
Significant (.001 ≤ p ≤ .05).
Highly significant (p < .001).