Angelika Schoster1, J Scott Weese2, Vinzenz Gerber3, Claudia Nicole Graubner4. 1. University of Zurich, Equine Department, Zurich, Switzerland. 2. University of Guelph, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 3. Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Bern, Switzerland. 4. Equine Clinic - Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Berne, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fecal water syndrome (FWS) is long-standing and common in horses, particularly in central Europe. No large epidemiological data sets exist, and the cause remains elusive. Dysbiosis could play a role in pathogenesis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether dysbiosis is present in horses with FWS when compared to stable-matched control horses in spring and autumn. ANIMALS: Fecal samples were collected from horses with FWS (n = 16; 9 mares, 7 geldings) and controls (n = 15; 8 mares, 7 geldings). METHODS: The bacterial microbiome of samples collected in spring and autumn of 2016 was analyzed using high-throughput sequencing. Differences in relative abundance of bacterial taxa, alpha diversity, and beta diversity indices were assessed between horses with FWS and controls based on season. RESULTS: Differences in microbial community composition based on time point and health status were not observed on any taxonomic level. Limited differences were seen on linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis. No difference in alpha diversity indices was observed including richness, diversity based on health status, or time point. No effect of health status on microbial community membership structure was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Limited differences were found in the bacterial microbiota of horses with and without FWS, regardless of season. Further research is needed to elucidate the role of microbiota in the development of FWS.
BACKGROUND: Fecal water syndrome (FWS) is long-standing and common in horses, particularly in central Europe. No large epidemiological data sets exist, and the cause remains elusive. Dysbiosis could play a role in pathogenesis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether dysbiosis is present in horses with FWS when compared to stable-matched control horses in spring and autumn. ANIMALS: Fecal samples were collected from horses with FWS (n = 16; 9 mares, 7 geldings) and controls (n = 15; 8 mares, 7 geldings). METHODS: The bacterial microbiome of samples collected in spring and autumn of 2016 was analyzed using high-throughput sequencing. Differences in relative abundance of bacterial taxa, alpha diversity, and beta diversity indices were assessed between horses with FWS and controls based on season. RESULTS: Differences in microbial community composition based on time point and health status were not observed on any taxonomic level. Limited differences were seen on linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis. No difference in alpha diversity indices was observed including richness, diversity based on health status, or time point. No effect of health status on microbial community membership structure was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Limited differences were found in the bacterial microbiota of horses with and without FWS, regardless of season. Further research is needed to elucidate the role of microbiota in the development of FWS.
Fecal water syndrome (FWS) in horses is a common problem, but so far it is reported in the literature only in central Europe.
Horses with FWS defecate manure of normal consistency, but watery fecal content also is passed before, during, or after defecation.
Horses usually do not show signs of severe intestinal disease, but some show mild signs of discomfort during defecation. In severe cases, weight loss, dermatitis along the hind limbs, and a general decline in condition also can be observed.
No large epidemiological data sets exist, but FWS has been reported to occur in adult horses of all breeds and signs occur most commonly in winter. The cause remains elusive, and organic disease in affected horses usually cannot be found. No association has been found with dentation status, feeding management, and parasite load.
Other suggested causes include dysbiosis, inflammation, and stress.
The owners of affected horses report that FWS can be severe enough to disable the horses. Veterinary examinations frequently fail to identify any underlying pathology.The bacterial microbiota plays a key role in human and animal health. Recent studies indicate that imbalances in the microbial communities and their function (dysbiosis) can be associated with diseases in the gastrointestinal tract and beyond.
Dysbiosis in horses has been associated with colitis,
laminitis,
,
grass sickness,
colic,
and diarrhea in foals.
,
Although dysbiosis has been suggested as a contributing factor in FWS in horses, this association has not been studied.Our objective was to analyze differences in the fecal bacterial microbiota between horses with FWS and stable‐matched healthy controls at 2 time points.
METHODS
This study was conducted with the approval of the Swiss Cantonal Veterinary Office (BE100/13).
Animals and study protocol
A prospective case‐control study was performed. Referring veterinarians of the equine clinic of the University of Bern were asked to provide contact information of owners of horses suffering from FWS. Horse owners then were called by a veterinary student in her final year (LC) and asked to take part in a telephone survey. The questionnaire contained in‐depth information about the horses' health status in general, use, and the individual history of the FWS (Supplementary Information S4). Horses were included in the study if the FWS duration was >4 months, fecal water was passed at least on 1 of 2 days during a period of at least 1 week, and if a physical examination performed by 2 veterinary students in their final year (LC, NB) was normal. A matched control was selected for every case but in 2 stables 2 patients were compared to 1 control, and in 1 stable 1 patient was compared to 2 controls. The inclusion criterion for control horses was absence of FWS. The control horses were the same age and same breed as the horses with FWS and had to have direct contact with the FWShorses or be stall neighbors to ensure consumption of the same water.
Sample collection
Fecal samples were collected during early spring by 1 of the authors (LC, February‐March 2014) and in autumn (August‐September 2014) of the same year. The autumn samples were collected by the owners after providing a fecal container at the spring visit. The packages were shipped overnight to the laboratory. The time points were chosen because FWS in this population was more frequent during spring than during autumn based on results of the telephone questionnaires. The samples were stored at 4°C for a maximum of 2 weeks before being transported to the laboratory where all were frozen at −80°C until DNA extraction. Some horses also had gastroscopy, measurement of saliva cortisol concentration after ACTH stimulation,
and fecal testing based on McMaster technique performed (Supplemental Information).
Metagenomic analysis of fecal samples
A sample of DNA was extracted from 1 g feces using a commercial kit (E.Z.N.A. Stool DNA Kit, Omega Bio‐Tek Inc, Georgia) according to manufacturer's recommendations. Adequate DNA quality and quantity were assessed by spectrophotometry (NanoDrop, Roche, Ontario, Canada).Amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, purification, and sequencing were performed as previously described.
Briefly, primers targeting the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene were designed with overhanging adapters for annealing to the Illumina index primers in the second PCR step. The PCR products were purified and Illumina index primers were attached during the second PCR step. The PCR products were purified and evaluated by gel‐electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel. The samples were sequenced at the University of Guelph's Advanced Analysis Centre using an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina RTA v1.17.28; MCS v2.2).
Bioinformatics and statistics
Distribution of age, sex, breed, equinegastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) grade, fecal egg counts, and salivary cortisol concentrations were compared between horses with and without FWS using Fisher's exact or chi square tests.Sequence processing was performed using Mothur 1.42.3 as outlined in the Mothur MiSeq SOP (https://www.mothur.org/wiki/MiSeq_SOP).
Primers were removed and sequences were aligned into contigs using the default Mothur settings. Contigs underwent a series of quality control steps, including removal of sequences with ambiguous base calls that were of inappropriate length (<239 or >244 base pairs) or contained runs of homopolymers >8 base pairs. Contigs were aligned to the SILVA 16S rRNA reference data
to ensure sequences were consistent with the V4 region. Those that did not properly align were removed. Chimeras were detected using UCHIME
and removed. Contigs were identified using ribosomal database project (RDP) classifier.
Contigs identified as chloroplast, mitochondria, archaea, or eukaryote were removed (0.3% of readings). Contigs were binned into operational taxon units (OTUs) using an open (de novo) OTU picking approach at a 3% dissimilarity level.
The OTUs also were identified using the RDP classifier (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp). Subsampling to the level of the sample with the smallest number of sequences (ie, 134 584) was performed to normalize sequence numbers for further comparison. Subsampling therefore consisted of random selection of 134 583 sequences from each sample. Completeness of sampling effort was assessed using Good's coverage. The sequences were uploaded to the University's data verse server (https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/A5NZZP).Alpha diversity was described using Chao richness, Shannon's evenness, and inverse Simpson's index. Only bacterial taxa accounting for >1% of the total were used for statistical analysis. Data were determined to be nonparametric based on examination of quantile plots and Shapiro‐Wilk testing. Relative abundances and alpha diversity indices were compared between healthy horses and horses with fecal water and between time points using the Wilcoxon test. False discovery rate (FDR) adjustments were performed using the Benjamin Hochberg procedure for comparisons of relative abundance of taxa.Community overlap and structure were compared between groups by parsimony test, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) applied to the Jaccard (community membership) and Yue and Clayton (community structure) indices, respectively. Dissimilarity was visualized using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis, involving Wilcoxon and Kruskal‐Wallis tests was performed to identify differentially abundant OTUs with 97% sequence similarity between groups.
The LDA value threshold was 2.0. A P‐value of <.05 was considered significant for all comparisons. A commercial program was used for all statistical analyses (JMP Statistical discoveries, Version 11).
RESULTS
Demographic data of animals
Thirty‐one horses were included, 16 horses with FWS and 15 stable‐matched controls. Age, sex, breed, and farm distribution are presented in Supplemental Information. Nine of 16 affected horses were female (56%) and middle‐aged (median, 14.2 years; range, 3‐32 years). No statistical difference was found among age, breed, and sex between control horses and horses with fecal water (P = .16, .57, and .15, respectively). The main breeds represented in the FWS group in our study were breeds used for pleasure riding including Freiberger, Frisian, and Frisian mix breeds, Fjord ponies, PRE and Haflinger (Supplementary Information S1). The owners of 8/16 (50%) of horses with FWS reported that fecal water occurred during winter or spring, whereas 3/16 (19%) reported that fecal water occurred during the whole year. The others reported no specific season but intermittent fecal water. Results from gastroscopy, ACTH stimulation testing and saliva cortisol measurements, and McMaster fecal analysis are presented in Supplementary Information S1. No significant difference was found between affected horses and controls with regard to EGUS grade (P = .6) and McMaster egg count (P = .8). Salivary cortisol concentration after ACTH stimulation was normal in all tested horses and therefore comparison could not be performed.
Sequencing quality data
A total of 4 097 088 V4 16S RNA gene sequences passed all quality control filters. Sequence numbers ranged from 134 584 to 552 218 (median 45 944). Median sequence numbers were 44 300 (range, 17 775‐5 542 178) in the control group and 48 067 (range 134 584‐375 450) in the FWS group.
Microbial community composition
Thirty different phyla, 80 classes, and 137 orders were identified. Seven phyla, 11 classes, and 12 orders had a mean relative abundance >1% (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
Relative abundance of A, phyla, B, classes, and C, orders of horses with and without fecal water syndrome sampled in autumn and spring. Other includes taxa with a relative abundance of <1%. In spring, 15 and 16 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 9 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively
Relative abundance of A, phyla, B, classes, and C, orders of horses with and without fecal water syndrome sampled in autumn and spring. Other includes taxa with a relative abundance of <1%. In spring, 15 and 16 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 9 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively
Fecal microbial composition compared between horses with FWS and matched controls
Analysis was stratified based on time point of sample collection. Only taxa with a relative abundance >1% were analyzed. No significant differences were found between the groups on the phylum, class, or order level after FDR adjustment (all P > .3, Figure 1).
Linear discriminant analysis effect size
In spring, 2 taxa were identified as enriched using LEfSe in the healthy group whereas 7 taxa were enriched in the FWS group (Figure 2A, full list, P values, and LDA values are shown in Supplementary Information S2). In autumn, 12 taxa were enriched in the control group whereas 5 taxa were enriched in the FWS group (Figure 2B, full list, P values, and LDA values are shown in Supplementary Information S3). Several enriched species also occurred in fall and spring when the population as a whole was examined, and when each subgroup (FWS and controls) was analyzed on its own (Supplementary Information S3).
FIGURE 2
Species significantly enriched in the bacterial microbiota of horses with (red) and without (blue) fecal water syndrome sampled in A, spring and B, autumn determined by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). In spring, 15 and 16 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 9 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively
Species significantly enriched in the bacterial microbiota of horses with (red) and without (blue) fecal water syndrome sampled in A, spring and B, autumn determined by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). In spring, 15 and 16 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 9 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively
Alpha diversity
No differences were found in alpha diversity indices between horses with FWS and control horses and both time points (Table 1).
TABLE 1
Alpha diversity indices and estimate of coverage of the microbiota of horses with fecal water syndrome and stable‐matched controls. In spring, 16 and 15 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 8 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively
Time point
Median (range)
P‐value
Control
Fecal water
Chao richness index
Spring
7576.2 (5740.6‐15 991.3)
9952.7 (4982.7‐18 977.8)
.58
Autumn
10 614.8 (6537.6‐18 735.1)
7084.6 (4689.2‐12 362.2)
.07
Simpson diversity index
Spring
375.5 (144.1‐908.1)
400.2 (172.2‐685.9)
.67
Autumn
464.1 (133.1‐582.6)
311.1 (81.7‐744.5)
.36
Shannon evenness index
Spring
0.88 (0.84‐0.91)
0.88 (0.85‐0.91)
.85
Autumn
0.89 (0.82‐0.89)
0.86 (0.79‐0.91)
.31
Good's coverage
Spring
0.82 (0.67‐0.85)
0.79 (0.66‐0.87)
.58
Autumn
0.78 (0.68‐0.84)
0.83 (0.73‐0.88)
.11
Alpha diversity indices and estimate of coverage of the microbiota of horses with fecal water syndrome and stable‐matched controls. In spring, 16 and 15 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 8 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively
Beta diversity
Distinct clusters (FWS versus controls) were not visually evident on Jaccard and Yue and Clayton PCoA (Figure 3) at either time points, and a statistically significant difference in community structure was not seen across statistical tests (Table 2).
FIGURE 3
Principal coordinate analysis of the fecal bacterial microbiota of horses with and without fecal water syndrome sampled in spring (A, B) and autumn (C, D). Principal coordinate analysis based on the Jaccard index in spring (B) and autumn (D) and the Yue and Clayton index in spring (A) and autumn (C); red: fecal water syndrome, blue: control. Each symbol represents a farm (disease/control pairs). In spring, 16 and 15 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 8 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively. Each symbol represents a farm, in 2 farms 2 horses were compared to 1 control and in 1 farm 1 horse was compared to 2 controls
TABLE 2
Difference in bacterial microbial composition (Jaccard index) and structure (Yue and Clayton index) of the fecal bacterial microbiota of horses with fecal water syndrome and stable‐matched controls. In spring, 16 and 15 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 8 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively
Spring
Autumn
Jaccard index P‐value
Yue and Clayton index P‐value
Jaccard index P‐value
Yue and Clayton index P‐value
Parsimony
.92
.19
.89
.57
UniFrac
.99
.96
.99
.96
AMOVA
.82
.60
.88
.61
ANOSIM
.64
.79
.91
.96
Abbreviations: AMOVA, analysis of molecular variance; ANOSIM, analysis of similarities.
Principal coordinate analysis of the fecal bacterial microbiota of horses with and without fecal water syndrome sampled in spring (A, B) and autumn (C, D). Principal coordinate analysis based on the Jaccard index in spring (B) and autumn (D) and the Yue and Clayton index in spring (A) and autumn (C); red: fecal water syndrome, blue: control. Each symbol represents a farm (disease/control pairs). In spring, 16 and 15 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 8 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectively. Each symbol represents a farm, in 2 farms 2 horses were compared to 1 control and in 1 farm 1 horse was compared to 2 controlsDifference in bacterial microbial composition (Jaccard index) and structure (Yue and Clayton index) of the fecal bacterial microbiota of horses with fecal water syndrome and stable‐matched controls. In spring, 16 and 15 horses with and without fecal water were sampled, respectively; in autumn, 8 and 7 horses with and without fecal syndrome were sampled, respectivelyAbbreviations: AMOVA, analysis of molecular variance; ANOSIM, analysis of similarities.
DISCUSSION
Fecal water syndrome is common in horses in Europe. Dysbiosis has been suggested to play role in FWS in horses, but this possibility has not been studied to date. We found only minor differences in microbiota composition between horses with FWS and stable‐matched controls. Alpha and beta diversity did not differ between affected horses and stable‐matched controls.
Microbiota composition of horses affected with FWS
No difference was seen in alpha diversity between horses affected with FWS and stable‐matched controls. In humans with functional gastrointestinal disorders, particularly irritable bowel syndrome, the diversity of microbial populations is decreased.
,
A potential explanation for the lack of difference seen in our study could be the power of the study.Fecal water syndrome likely is a multifactorial disease. Stress associated with low hierarchical status in the herd has been suggested because it is a factor for the development of FWS.
A link between dysbiosis and stress has been suggested because animal models have shown that acute and chronic stress can alter intestinal permeability and induce inflammation in the gastrointestinal system.
,
Results from the ACTH stimulation stress test and gastroscopy could not confirm stress as a reason for FWS in this population.The microbiota produces a substantical proportion of the gases present in the gastrointestinal tract, including hydrogen sulfide. Hydrogen sulfide recently has been recognized as a gaseous neuromodulator or neurotransmitter capable of modulating intestinal inflammation.
The term microbiota‐gut‐brain axis has been coined to describe this important relationship among these 3 organs.
Many bacteria can produce hydrogen sulfide, including some of the bacteria enriched in the FWS group in our study (Selenomonas).
Additional research could focus on the role of metabolites produced by the microbiota in addition to the composition of the microbiota.Differences based on health status and season were evident on LEfSe analysis. Statistical tests dependent on taxonomic categories such as phyla and order often fail to detect community‐level differences because they mainly take into account relative abundances.
Approaches thus have been developed to evaluate community‐based measures for evaluating the microbiota, such as community membership, community structure, and other ways to assess differences in composition such as LEfSe. This method identifies features that are statistically different among biological classes using a nonparametric test and then applies additional tests to assess whether these differences are consistent with regard to expected biological behavior. The LEfSe analysis therefore emphasizes both statistical significance and biological relevance.
Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae, members of the Clostridia class, are consistently underrepresented in studies of humans and animals, independent of the cause of gastrointestinal disease.
,
,
,
,
A decrease of these bacterial families in horses with colitis and colic as well as horses exposed to stressful factors such as fasting, transport, and anesthesia also has been found,
,
,
and a decrease in some of these members has been identified before the onset of colic in postpartum mares.
Unfortunately >50% of the enriched species were unclassified in our study, limiting interpretation of the results. Several OTUs belonging to the Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae were enriched in the FWS group as well as in the control group. A decrease in these species that are important for gastrointestinal health in horses with FWS therefore was not supported in our study.In healthy horses, temporal variation is limited and differences usually are based on individual composition of the microbiota and husbandry, particularly feeding practices.
,
We elected to sample horses and their controls at 2 time points to try and collect samples when signs were most severe and during more normal time periods. Sampling at more time points would be necessary to assess whether temporal stability is decreased in horses with FWS compared to healthy controls. One limitation was that approximately 50% of horses were unavailable for repeat sampling in autumn.There is individual animal variation in the composition of the microbiota in horses, but there is also a substantial impact of husbandry. Different feeding and management conditions have been shown to cause significant shifts in the microbiota.
We therefore chose to include stable, age, and breed‐matched controls to decrease the bias of husbandry.
LIMITATIONS
The main limitation of our study was the selection of cases and controls. Because different diseases have been suggested as causes for chronic diarrhea and also for individual FWS cases, a standardized approach to diagnose FWS does not exist. Therefore, we chose to include horses for which the veterinarian in charge of the case perceived the horse to be suffering from FWS and for which the history was consistent with this syndrome. Additional tests for the patients depended on the cost to the owners and therefore could not be regarded as inclusion criteria. Controls were selected based on normal manure production, normal clinical examination, and similar age and breed. The abnormal findings for some of the diagnostic tests (eg, presence of EGUS on gastroscopy) were not considered as the cause of FWS, but this possibility could not be ruled out completely.Storage of fecal samples at 4°C for 14 days is not ideal because data from human medicine indicate stability for 24 hours at 4°C, and current recommendations are to store samples for a maximum of 24 hours at 4°C.
,
However, storage at 4°C for 14 days had a limited effect on microbial composition of feces in dogs and cats when assessed by metagenomic sequencing.
No data are available for fecal samples from horses. Disease status also might play a role in the stability of the microbiome under different storage conditions. In a study comparing different sampling and storage methods in healthy human subjects and patients with inflammatory bowel disease, sampling method had an effect whereas storage method did not.
No difference was found between the reference storage method (immediate storage at −80°C) compared to room temperature for 24 hours, 4°C for 24 hours, and −20°C for 2 weeks, with regard to changes in the relative abundance of dominant phyla, relative abundance of oxygen sensitive species, alpha diversity indices, and microbial structure. The effect of different storage methods was also not significant in the subgroups of healthy individuals and patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Our samples, however, were stored for 14 days at 4°C, and it is unclear how the prolonged storage at 4°C might have affected microbial composition.Fecal water syndrome is likely a multifactorial disease. Minor changes in the gut microbiota were present between affected horses and healthy horses, indicating that the microbiota is a potential factor in the development of clinical signs. Additional research is needed to further elucidate the role of the microbiota in FWS and to try and exploit this knowledge for new therapeutic strategies.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
OFF‐LABEL ANTIMICROBIAL DECLARATION
Authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.
INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) OR OTHER APPROVAL DECLARATION
This study was conducted with the approval of the Swiss cantonal veterinary office (BE100/13).
HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION
Authors declare human ethics approval was not needed for this study.Appendix
S1. Supplemental Table 1. Information to dysbiosis not present in horses with fecal water syndrome when compared to controls in spring and autumn: Population data on horses studiedClick here for additional data file.Appendix
S2. Supporting Information.Click here for additional data file.Appendix
S3. Supplementary Table 2. LEFSE resultsClick here for additional data file.Appendix
S4. Supporting Information.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: J S Weese; S J Holcombe; R M Embertson; K A Kurtz; H A Roessner; M Jalali; S E Wismer Journal: Equine Vet J Date: 2014-12-14 Impact factor: 2.888
Authors: Sylvie Bradesi; Ines Schwetz; Helena S Ennes; Christophe M R Lamy; Gordon Ohning; Michael Fanselow; Charalabos Pothoulakis; James A McRoberts; Emeran A Mayer Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2005-03-03 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Gabriel J Milinovich; Darren J Trott; Paul C Burrell; Emma L Croser; Rafat A M Al Jassim; John M Morton; Andrew W van Eps; Christopher C Pollitt Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Danyta I Tedjo; Daisy M A E Jonkers; Paul H Savelkoul; Ad A Masclee; Niels van Best; Marieke J Pierik; John Penders Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Karlette A Fernandes; Sandra Kittelmann; Christopher W Rogers; Erica K Gee; Charlotte F Bolwell; Emma N Bermingham; David G Thomas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christian Quast; Elmar Pruesse; Pelin Yilmaz; Jan Gerken; Timmy Schweer; Pablo Yarza; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 16.971