Literature DB >> 32588206

The impact of phone counseling on urinary stone prevention.

Amihay Nevo1, Karen L Stern2, Jonathan P Moore2, Mitchell R Humphreys2, Mark D Tyson2, Mira T Keddis3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared the effect of standard office-based consultation (OC) and phone correspondences (PC) on dietary 24-h urinary parameters.
METHODS: The medical record of all patients treated between January and April 2019 was reviewed. Only patients who had at least two consecutive 24-h urine collections were included. Linear and logistic regressions were used to investigate the difference between the changes in urinary parameters after OC and PC.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients underwent 135 OC and 34 PC. Twenty-one received OC and PC, and 22 had only OC. Gender, age, the distance to stone clinic, the number of previous stone episodes, and baseline urinary parameters were similar between the groups. Patients who had both OC and PC had a longer follow-up time (51.7 vs 18.5 months, p < 0.0001) as well as more consults (Median 5.4 vs 2.5, p < 0.0001). Six (27%) patients who had only OC, and eight (38%) patients who had both OC and PC, experienced stone recurrence during the study period (p = 0.52). Following PC, there was a greater improvement in urine volume in comparison to OC (0.27 l/day vs -0.06 l/day, p = 0.034), but there was no difference in the absolute values after the consults between the groups.
CONCLUSION: In established stone-clinic patients, PC was associated with a better adherence with follow-up. The 24-h urine results were similar between PC and OC. PC may be an effective alternative for urinary stone management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  24-h urine collection; Kidney stones; Telemedicine

Year:  2020        PMID: 32588206     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03320-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  10 in total

1.  The effect of travel distance on health-related quality of life for patients with nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Gopal L Narang; Laura E Wiener; Kristina L Penniston; Jodi A Antonelli; Timothy D Averch; Sri Sivalingam; Ben H Chew; Vincent G Bird; Vernon M Pais; Roger L Sur; Thomas Chi; Necole M Streeper; Stephen Y Nakada; Gary G Koch; Davis P Viprakasit
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Cost-effectiveness of primary prevention strategies for nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Primary prevention of nephrolithiasis is cost-effective for a national healthcare system.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Inmaculada Buendia Jiménez; Irene Lenoir-Wijnkoop; Michel Daudon; Laurent Molinier; Ivan Tack; Mark J C Nuijten
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management?

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Geoffrey Joyce; Anga R Timilsina
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Satisfaction of a new telephone consultation service for prenatal and postnatal health care.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kobayashi; Toshiyuki Sado
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Randomized trial of allopurinol in the prevention of calcium oxalate calculi.

Authors:  B Ettinger; A Tang; J T Citron; B Livermore; T Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota.

Authors:  C M Johnson; D M Wilson; W M O'Fallon; R S Malek; L T Kurland
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 8.  Urine volume: stone risk factor and preventive measure.

Authors:  L Borghi; T Meschi; T Schianchi; A Briganti; A Guerra; F Allegri; A Novarini
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.847

9.  Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study.

Authors:  L Borghi; T Meschi; F Amato; A Briganti; A Novarini; A Giannini
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  An economic analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system.

Authors:  John D Whited; Santanu Datta; Russell P Hall; Marjorie E Foy; Laurie E Marbrey; Steven C Grambow; Tara K Dudley; David L Simel; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.536

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Implementing telemedicine for the management of benign urologic conditions: a single centre experience in Italy.

Authors:  Enrico Checcucci; Stefano De Luca; Paolo Alessio; Paolo Verri; Stefano Granato; Sabrina De Cillis; Daniele Amparore; Michele Sica; Federico Piramide; Alberto Piana; Gabriele Volpi; Matteo Manfredi; Gabriella Balestra; Riccardo Autorino; Cristian Fiori; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.