| Literature DB >> 32586321 |
Barbara Kazuń1, Joanna Małaczewska2, Krzysztof Kazuń3, Rafał Kamiński4, Dobrochna Adamek-Urbańska5, Joanna Żylińska-Urban6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study has been to compare the effect of dietary supplementation of β-1,3/1,6-glucan, Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria or their mixture on the growth performance, selected parameters of the immune system as well as the liver and intestinal histology of roach. Fish were fed for 14 days with four different diets, each treatment being carried out in triplicate. In control group, fish were fed dry commercial starter feed Aller Performa 2 (Aller Aqua, Denmark). The other experimental fish groups received the same commercial starter feed supplemented with: 1% β-1,3/1,6-glucan (Leiber® Beta-S) in group G; 108 cfu L. plantarum g- 1 in group L; 1% β-1,3/1,6-glucan + 108 cfu L. plantarum g- 1 in group G + L. The stimulating effect of the tested preparations was evaluated once the feeding with commercial feed exclusively was resumed and 2 weeks afterwards.Entities:
Keywords: Aquaculture; Environmental friendly; Innate immunity; Synbiotic supplementation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32586321 PMCID: PMC7318362 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02432-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Final mean (± SD) values of BW, TL, SGR and daily ITL of R. rutilus juveniles fed commercial diet (Control group) and the diet supplemented with: β-glucan (G), L. plantarum (L) and β-glucan+L. plantarum (G + L)
| Experimental period | Parameter | Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | G | L | G + L | ||
| Phase 1 (experimental days 1–14) | BW (g) | 3.00 ± 0.17 | 3.02 ± 0.29 | 2.94 ± 0.18 | 2.95 ± 0.10 |
| TL (mm) | 71.0 ± 1.4 | 71.0 ± 2.0 | 70.9 ± 1.1 | 70.7 ± 0.9 | |
| SGR | 1.46 ± 0.08 | 1.46 ± 0.03 | 1.41 ± 0.06 | 1.37 ± 0.12 | |
| ITL (mm d− 1) | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | |
| Phase 2 (experimental days 15–28) | BW (g) | 3.28 ± 0.35 | 3.30 ± 0.62 | 3.24 ± 0.23 | 3.48 ± 0.20 |
| TL (mm) | 73.3 ± 2.5 | 73.7 ± 3.7 | 73.1 ± 1.4 | 73.9 ± 1.4 | |
| SGR | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.69 ± 0.16 | 0.63 ± 0.23 | |
| ITL (mm d− 1) | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.06 | |
The differences between experimental groups are not significant (n = 3; p < 0.05)
The humoral-mediated immune parameters in roach fed β-glucan (G), L. plantarum (L) and β-glucan+L. plantarum (G + L) supplemented feed or commercial diet (Control), uptake 1
| Parameter | Control | G | L | G + L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZ activity in serum (mg L− 1) | 36.3 ± 0.3b | 47.7 ± 0.2a | 36.5 ± 0.2b | 49.2 ± 0.3a |
| Cp activity in serum (IU) | 46.23 ± 1.94a | 48.37 ± 1.44a | 46.58 ± 1.27a | 47.52 ± 1.84a |
| TP level in serum (g L− 1) | 25.59 ± 1.84a | 27.53 ± 1.72a | 26.77 ± 1.16a | 28.13 ± 1.04a |
| Total Ig level in serum (g L− 1) | 5.13 ± 1.68b | 9.12 ± 1.26a | 5.82 ± 1.38b | 9.95 ± 1.79a |
mean ± SD; n = 3; a,b - significant differences between marked values at p < 0.05
The humoral-mediated immune parameters in roach fed β-glucan (G), L. plantarum and β-glucan+L. plantarum (G + L) supplemented feed or commercial diet (Control), uptake 2
| Parameter | Control | G | L | G + L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZ activity in serum (mg L−1) | 36.2 ± 0.3b | 47.8 ± 0.4a | 36.4 ± 0.2b | 48.7 ± 0.4a |
| Cp activity in serum (IU) | 47.35 ± 0.83a | 46.98 ± 1.74a | 47.36 ± 0.56a | 47.88 ± 1.31a |
| TP level in serum (g L− 1) | 26.14 ± 2.04a | 28.29 ± 0.83a | 27.63 ± 0.86a | 27.97 ± 1.07a |
| Total Ig level in serum (g L− 1) | 6.08 ± 1.27b | 10.12 ± 1.78a | 7.95 ± 0.83b | 9.85 ± 1.95a |
mean ± SD; n = 3; a,b - significant differences between marked values at p < 0.05
The cell-mediated immune parameters in roach fed β-glucan (G), L. plantarum (L) and β-glucan+L. plantarum (G + L) supplemented feed or commercial diet (Control), uptake 1
| Parameter | Control | G | L | G + L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinocytic activity of the head kidney phagocytes (% of ingested NR) | 19.84 ± 3.14b | 29.09 ± 4.84a | 21.79 ± 4.21b | 20.76 ± 1.73b |
| RBA of spleen phagocytes (SI) | 1.05 ± 0.12a | 0.97 ± 0.10a | 1.10 ± 0.15a | 1.00 ± 0.13a |
| RBA of head kidney phagocytes (SI) | 1.15 ± 0.10b | 1.46 ± 0.14ab | 1.73 ± 0.20a | 1.73 ± 0.19a |
| PKA of spleen phagocytes (SI) | 1.13 ± 0.11b | 1.11 ± 0.12b | 1.44 ± 0.13a | 1.10 ± 0.06b |
| PKA of head kidney phagocytes (SI) | 1.07 ± 0.09c | 1.13 ± 0.09c | 1.48 ± 0.09a | 1.29 ± 0.07b |
| Proliferative response of head kidney lymphocytes stimulated by ConA (SI) | 1.47 ± 0.09a | 1.19 ± 0.12a | 1.29 ± 0.15a | 1.21 ± 0.10a |
| Proliferative response of spleen lymphocytes stimulated by ConA (SI) | 1.25 ± 0.14a | 1.32 ± 0.11a | 1.37 ± 0.17a | 1.14 ± 0.09a |
| Proliferative response of head kidney lymphocytes stimulated by LPS (SI) | 1.26 ± 0.14a | 1.09 ± 0.10a | 1.11 ± 0.13a | 1.05 ± 0.08a |
| Proliferative response of spleen lymphocytes stimulated by LPS (SI) | 1.12 ± 0.10a | 1.09 ± 0.11a | 1.02 ± 0.09a | 1.10 ± 0.10a |
mean ± SD; n = 3; a,b,c - significant differences between marked values at p < 0.05
The cell-mediated immune parameters in roach fed β-glucan (G), L. plantarum and β-glucan+L. plantarum (G + L) supplemented feed or commercial diet (Control), uptake 2
| Parameter | Control | G | L | G + L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinocytic activity of the head kidney phagocytes(% of ingested NR) | 17.50 ± 2.08b | 23.90 ± 1.54a | 17.20 ± 3.24b | 18.74 ± 1.65b |
| RBA of spleen phagocytes (SI) | 1.15 ± 0.14a | 1.21 ± 0.21a | 1.29 ± 0.08a | 1.05 ± 0.09a |
| RBA of head kidney phagocytes (SI) | 2.10 ± 0.43a | 2.03 ± 0.15a | 2.36 ± 0.22a | 2.17 ± 0.30a |
| PKA of spleen phagocytes (SI) | 1.39 ± 0.10a | 1.48 ± 0.25a | 1.29 ± 0.13a | 1.35 ± 0.10a |
| PKA of head kidney phagocytes (SI) | 1.38 ± 0.10c | 1.56 ± 0.07c | 1.65 ± 0.09a | 1.61 ± 0.11b |
| Proliferative response of head kidney lymphocytes stimulated by ConA (SI) | 1.28 ± 0.10a | 1.49 ± 0.16a | 1.37 ± 0.14a | 1.33 ± 0.12a |
| Proliferative response of spleen lymphocytes stimulated by ConA (SI) | 1.15 ± 0.12a | 1.08 ± 0.11a | 1.29 ± 0.10a | 1.28 ± 0.15a |
| Proliferative response of head kidney lymphocytes stimulated by LPS (SI) | 1.11 ± 0.11a | 1.24 ± 0.09a | 1.21 ± 0.13a | 1.14 ± 0.11a |
| Proliferative response of spleen lymphocytes stimulated by LPS (SI) | 1.07 ± 0.09a | 1.05 ± 0.11a | 1.20 ± 0.08a | 1.18 ± 0.12a |
mean ± SD; n = 3; a,b,c - significant differences between marked values at p < 0.05
Histomorphometric results of the intestine and liver of R. rutilus juveniles fed commercial diet (Control) and the diet supplemented with: β-glucan (G), L. plantarum (L) and β-glucan+L. plantarum (G + L) (±SD)
| Parameter | Control | G | L | G + L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior fold length [μm] | 342.23 ± 39.17a | 282.47 ± 93.87b | 313.79 ± 40.73ab | 317.54 ± 32.61ab |
| Anterior CD3-positive cells/100 μm fold length | 27.19 ± 5.07b | 40.05 ± 11.97a | 25.93 ± 3.27b | 35.35 ± 4.33a |
| Anterior PCNA-positive/100 μm fold length | 8.91 ± 1.68b | 18.02 ± 2.32a | 26.67 ± 4.94c | 27.93 ± 5.06c |
| Anterior rodlet cells/100 μm fold length | 0.65 ± 0.41b | 2.13 ± 0.57c | 2.64 ± 0.53c | 8.73 ± 1.07a |
| Midgut fold length [μm] | 292.48 ± 32.78b | 249.34 ± 51.27b | 274.69 ± 32.31b | 210.71 ± 23.95a |
| Midgut CD3-positive cells/100 μm fold length | 14.89 ± 3.83b | 17.22 ± 3.30b | 15.49 ± 2.64b | 35.82 ± 4.72a |
| Midgut PCNA-positive cell/100 μm fold length | 4.71 ± 0.99b | 9.48 ± 2.32c | 11.14 ± 1.29c | 26.34 ± 4.19a |
| Midgut rodlet cells/100 μm fold length | 1.96 ± 0.57c | 1.91 ± 0.58c | 3.38 ± 0.92b | 7.31 ± 2.05a |
| Posterior fold length [μm] | 290.29 ± 54.14b | 297.76 ± 53.93b | 330.11 ± 59.35b | 248.32 ± 29.04a |
| Posterior CD3-positive cells/100 μm fold length | 44.11 ± 9.46ab | 48.94 ± 12.29a | 34.22 ± 7.70c | 39.36 ± 3.62bc |
| Posterior PCNA-positive cells/100 μm fold length | 12.78 ± 1.61b | 16.53 ± 3.59a | 11.63 ± 1.73b | 18.87 ± 4.23a |
| Number of PCNA-positive cells in liver/100 μm2 | 0.006 ± 0.003c | 0.016 ± 0.004bc | 0.011 ± 0.008b | 0.031 ± 0.007a |
a,b,c - significant differences between marked values at p < 0.05
Fig. 1Immunohistochemical localization of CD3-positive cells (black arrows) in the midgut of Rutilus rutilus juveniles fed commercial diet: A - Control group and the diet supplemented with: B - β-glucan (G group), C - L. plantarum (L group) and D - β-glucan+L. plantarum (G + L group), mag. 200x