| Literature DB >> 32585846 |
Justyna Sawicka1, Maria Dzierżyńska1, Anna Wardowska2, Milena Deptuła2, Piotr Rogujski3,4, Paweł Sosnowski5, Natalia Filipowicz6,7, Alina Mieczkowska6, Piotr Sass5, Anna Pawlik8, Aleksandra Hać8, Adriana Schumacher9, Magdalena Gucwa6, Natalia Karska1, Jolanta Kamińska5, Rafał Płatek3, Jarosław Mazuryk3,10, Jacek Zieliński11, Karolina Kondej12, Piotr Młynarz13, Piotr Mucha14, Piotr Skowron15, Łukasz Janus16, Anna Herman-Antosiewicz8, Paweł Sachadyn5, Artur Czupryn3, Arkadiusz Piotrowski6,7, Michał Pikuła2, Sylwia Rodziewicz-Motowidło1.
Abstract
Regeneration and wound healing are vital to tissue homeostasis and organism survival. One of the biggest challenges of today's science and medicine is finding methods and factors to stimulate these processes in the human body. Effective solutions to promote regenerative responses will accelerate advances in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, transplantology, and a number of other clinical specialties. In this study, we assessed the potential efficacy of a synthetic hexapeptide, RDKVYR, for the stimulation of tissue repair and wound healing. The hexapeptide is marketed under the name "Imunofan" (IM) as an immunostimulant. IM displayed stability in aqueous solutions, while in plasma it was rapidly bound by albumins. Structural analyses demonstrated the conformational flexibility of the peptide. Tests in human fibroblast and keratinocyte cell lines showed that IM exerted a statistically significant (p < 0.05) pro-proliferative activity (30-40% and 20-50% increase in proliferation of fibroblast and keratinocytes, respectively), revealed no cytotoxicity over a vast range of concentrations (p < 0.05), and had no allergic properties. IM was found to induce significant transcriptional responses, such as enhanced activity of genes involved in active DNA demethylation (p < 0.05) in fibroblasts and activation of genes involved in immune responses, migration, and chemotaxis in adipose-derived stem cells derived from surgery donors. Experiments in a model of ear pinna injury in mice indicated that IM moderately promoted tissue repair (8% in BALB/c and 36% in C57BL/6 in comparison to control).Entities:
Keywords: adipose-derived stem cells; cell proliferation; ear pinna model; fibroblasts; immunological safety; imunofan; keratinocytes; peptides; transcriptomics; wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32585846 PMCID: PMC7355430 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25122884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(A) CD spectra of Imunofan (IM) peptide in PBS at pH 7.4, over the temperature range 25–50 °C; (B) structure of IM obtained after 10 ns of MD simulation in water. The peptide backbone structure is depicted as a stick projection, where the hydrogen bond and salt bridge are marked as dotted lines.
Figure 2Effect of IM on proliferation of 46BR.1N fibroblasts (A) and HaCaT keratinocyte cell lines (B) and (C) adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). The graph shows results from 4 independent experiments (4 replicates in each, n = 16). Results are presented as mean with SD. *—statistically significant differences compared to control, Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05. FBS—positive control-cells grown in medium containing 10% FBS.
Figure 3Effect of IM on immune cells activation. (A) overall percentage of immune cells subpopulations cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), helper T cells (Th), and natural killer cells (NK), after stimulation with IM (0.1 µg/mL; 1.0 µg/mL). Unstimulated cells were treated as a negative control, while cell cultivated in the presence of LPS/PHA were a positive control. (B) percentage of cells expressing activation markers among specific immune cell subpopulations CTL, Th, and NK. (C) activation of dendritic cells (DC) subjected to IM, presented as a percentage of cells with active phenotype. The graph shows results from 5 independent experiments. Results are presented as mean with SD. *—statistically significant differences compared to control, Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05. All data are presented as percentages due to the application of hospital diagnostic laboratory standards for immune cells analyses.
Figure 4Effect of IM on activation of basophils. The figure shows basophil activation in the presence of: Positive controls, monoclonal antibody FcRI, fMLP, and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA); negative control; and IM peptide (0.1 µg/mL). The graph shows results from 7 independent experiments. Results are presented as mean with SD.
Figure 5Transcriptional responses of TET1, TET3, and POU5F1 to IM at 0.1 µg/mL in primary fibroblast cell cultures. Controls were cultured in the same medium without IM addition. No statistically significant changes were observed (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05).
Functions predicted to be altered in ASCs from donor 6 stimulated with 0.1 µg/mL IM peptide, in comparison to cells cultured with FBS-deprived medium. The results were obtained with disease and function mode implemented in ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) software.
| Function | 1 | Predicted Direction of Change | z-Score | Number of Altered Transcripts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activation of cells | 3.84 × 10−3 | Activation | 2.685 | 21 |
| Immune response | 1.33 × 10−4 | Activation | 2.628 | 25 |
| Chemotaxis | 3.57 × 10−7 | Activation | 2.555 | 29 |
| Cell movements | 1.48 × 10−6 | Activation | 2.455 | 68 |
| Synthesis of nitric oxide | 6.62 × 10−4 | Activation | 2.391 | 9 |
| RNA transactivation | 1.22 × 10−3 | Activation | 2.318 | 20 |
| Cell migration of granulocytes | 1.67 × 10−3 | Activation | 2.316 | 12 |
| Permeability of endothelium cells | 2.15 × 10−3 | Activation | 2.193 | 5 |
| Binding of neutrophils | 2.82 × 10−3 | Activation | 2.168 | 6 |
| Migration of endothelium cells | 1.21 × 10−5 | Activation | 2.149 | 22 |
| Secretion of lipids | 3.45 × 10−3 | Activation | 2.122 | 7 |
| Cell migration of neutrophils | 4.48 × 10−4 | Activation | 2.099 | 11 |
| Migration of cells | 1.78 × 10−4 | Activation | 2.063 | 55 |
| Synthesis of fatty acids | 1.12 × 10−3 | Activation | 2.021 | 13 |
. Algorithm in IPA designed to reduce the chance that random data will produce a significant prediction. It identifies functions with the strongest prediction for increase (positive z-score) or decrease (negative z-score). Values of p- value < 0.05 and z-score ≤ −2 or ≥ 2 are considered significant.
Figure 6Effect of subcutaneous IM injections on ear punch closure in mice of the BALB/c strain. (A) and (C) representative photographs depicting the progress of ear hole closure in BALB/c mice, without or with IM stimulation. (A) the treatment group (IM injections; n = 12 mice) and (C) shows the control group (saline injections; n = 12 mice). (B) the timeline of experiments and injection intervals. (D) the mean area of BALB/c mice ear holes throughout the experiment; n = 6; error bars represent SD; and statistical significance * means p ≤ 0.05. (E) the distribution of ear hole area at 42 days post injury in the BALB/c mice strain, where each dot represents one ear hole and the black line represents the mean value.
Figure 7Effect of subcutaneous IM injections on ear punch closure in mice of the C57BL/6 strain. (A) and (C) representative photographs of healing ear pinnae in C57BL/6 mice injected with saline or IM. (A) the treatment group (IM injections; n = 8 mice) and (C) the control group (saline injections; n = 18 mice). (B) the timeline of experiments and injection intervals. The scale bar is calibrated in mm. (D) the mean area of C57BL/6 mice ear holes throughout the experiment; error bars represent SD; and statistical significance * means p ≤ 0.05. (E) shows the distribution of ear hole area at 42 days post injury in the C57BL/6 mice strain. Each dot represents one ear hole, and the black line represents the mean value.
Figure 8Histological examination of BALB/c mice ear pinna tissue harvested after 42 days of treatment with vehicle only (saline) (A) or treatment with IM (B). Frames mark enhanced epidermis regeneration. The zone of restoration was calculated by subtracting the radius of ear hole at day 42 from the radius of the initial ear hole.