Literature DB >> 32585466

Removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant: Long-term performance of granular activated carbon (GAC) and influence of flow-rate.

Nadine Belkouteb1, Vera Franke2, Philip McCleaf3, Stephan Köhler1, Lutz Ahrens1.   

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been ubiquitously detected in drinking water which poses a risk for human exposure. In this study, the treatment efficiency for the removal of 15 PFASs was examined in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) in the City of Uppsala, Sweden, over a period of two years (2015-2017). Removal of the five frequently detected PFASs was influenced by the total operation time of granular activated carbon (GAC) filters, GAC type and surface loading rate. The average removal efficiency of PFASs ranged from 92 to 100% for "young" GAC filters and decreased to 7.0-100% for "old" GAC filters (up to 357 operation days, 29 300 bed volumes (BV) treated). Flow-rates were adjusted in two full-scale GAC filters of different operational age to examine the removal of PFAS and organic matter depending on GAC operational age and operating flow. The decrease in flow-rate by 10 L s-1 from 39 to 29 L s-1 led to an average increase of 14% and 6.5% in total PFAS removal efficiency for an "old" (264 operation days, 21 971 BV treated) and a "young" GAC filter (63 operation days, 5 725 BV treated), respectively. A cost-analysis for various operation scenarios illustrated the dominating effect of treatment goals and costs for GAC regeneration on overall GAC operation costs. The unit costs for GAC filters ranged from 0.08 to 0.10 € m-3 water treated and 0.020-0.025 € m-3 water treated for a treatment goal of 10 ng L-1 and 85 ng L-1, respectively, for ∑11PFAS. Furthermore, it was concluded that prolonging the GAC service life by lowering the flow-rates after reaching the treatment goal could lead to a 26% cost-deduction. The results and methods presented in this study give drinking water providers valuable tools for the operation of a full-scale treatment train for the removal of PFAS in contaminated raw water.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drinking water treatment; Granular activated carbon; PFAS; PFC; PFOA; PFOS

Year:  2020        PMID: 32585466     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

1.  Pilot-Scale Continuous Foam Fractionation for the Removal of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) from Landfill Leachate.

Authors:  Sanne J Smith; Karin Wiberg; Philip McCleaf; Lutz Ahrens
Journal:  ACS ES T Water       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Managing and treating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in membrane concentrates.

Authors:  Emily W Tow; Mahmut Selim Ersan; Soyoon Kum; Tae Lee; Thomas F Speth; Christine Owen; Christopher Bellona; Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda; Anne M Mikelonis; Paul Westerhoff; Chandra Mysore; Val S Frenkel; Viraj deSilva; W Shane Walker; Andrew K Safulko; David A Ladner
Journal:  AWWA Water Sci       Date:  2021-09-02

3.  Special Issue "Advanced Materials for Water Remediation".

Authors:  Gabriela Buema; Oana-Georgiana Dragos-Pinzaru; Horia Chiriac; Nicoleta Lupu; Daniel Gherca
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 4.  A Review on Removal and Destruction of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by Novel Membranes.

Authors:  Suman Das; Avner Ronen
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 5.  Nothing lasts forever: understanding microbial biodegradation of polyfluorinated compounds and perfluorinated alkyl substances.

Authors:  Lawrence P Wackett
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.813

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.