Literature DB >> 32584979

Screening for cardiovascular disease risk using traditional risk factor assessment or coronary artery calcium scoring: the ROBINSCA trial.

Carlijn M van der Aalst1, Sabine J A M Denissen1, Marleen Vonder2, Jan Willem C Gratama3, Henk J Adriaansen4, Dirkjan Kuijpers5,6, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart2, Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep7, Pim van der Harst2,8,9, Richard L Braam10, Paul R M van Dijkman11,12, Rykel van Bruggen13, Matthijs Oudkerk14,15, Harry J de Koning1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Screening for a high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk followed by preventive treatment can potentially reduce coronary heart disease-related morbidity and mortality. ROBINSCA (Risk Or Benefit IN Screening for CArdiovascular disease) is a population-based randomized controlled screening trial that investigates the effectiveness of CVD screening in asymptomatic participants using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) model or coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. This study describes the distributions in risk and treatment in the ROBINSCA trial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Individuals at expected elevated CVD risk were randomized into screening arm A (n = 14 478; SCORE, 10-year fatal and non-fatal risk); or screening arm B (n = 14 450; CAC scoring). Preventive treatment was largely advised according to current Dutch guidelines. Risk and treatment differences between the screening arms were analysed. A total of 12 185 participants (84.2%) in arm A and 12 950 (89.6%) in arm B were screened. In total, 48.7% were women, and median age was 62 (interquartile range 10) years. SCORE screening identified 45.1% at low risk (SCORE < 10%), 26.5% at intermediate risk (SCORE 10-20%), and 28.4% at high risk (SCORE ≥ 20%). According to CAC screening, 76.0% were at low risk (Agatston < 100), 15.1% at high risk (Agatston 100-399), and 8.9% at very high risk (Agatston ≥ 400). CAC scoring significantly reduced the number of individuals indicated for preventive treatment compared to SCORE (relative reduction women: 37.2%; men: 28.8%).
CONCLUSION: We showed that compared to risk stratification based on SCORE, CAC scoring classified significantly fewer men and women at increased risk, and less preventive treatment was indicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6471. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Computed tomography imaging; Coronary artery calcification; Population-based screening; ROBINSCA trial; Risk prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32584979     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  7 in total

1.  Clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography: a consensus paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging-part I.

Authors:  Gianluca Pontone; Alexia Rossi; Marco Guglielmo; Marc R Dweck; Oliver Gaemperli; Koen Nieman; Francesca Pugliese; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Alessia Gimelli; Bernard Cosyns; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Coronary artery calcium scoring in individuals at risk for coronary artery disease: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marleen Vonder; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in the Older Athlete.

Authors:  Alec J Moorman; Larry S Dean; Eugene Yang; Jonathan A Drezner
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Association of coronary calcification with prognosis of Covid-19 patients without known heart disease.

Authors:  R Y Possari; H J Andrade-Gomes; V C Mello; E A Galdeano; L F Aguiar-Filho; M S Bittencourt; E V Ponte; L R Bertoche; L R S Caio; J D Rodrigues; F B Alcantara; M A C Freitas; J C G C Sarinho; N K Cervigne; W M Rodrigues; I Aprahamian
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 5.  Implementation of lung cancer screening: what are the main issues?

Authors:  Carlijn M van der Aalst; Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02

6.  Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial.

Authors:  Moniek Y Koopman; Jorn J W Reijnders; Robert T A Willemsen; Rykel van Bruggen; Carine J M Doggen; Bas Kietselaer; Martijn J Oude Wolcherink; Peter M A van Ooijen; Jan Willem C Gratama; Richard Braam; Matthijs Oudkerk; Pim van der Harst; Geert-Jan Dinant; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Radiologist opinions regarding reporting incidental coronary and cardiac calcification on thoracic CT.

Authors:  Michelle C Williams; Jonathan Weir-McCall; Alastair J Moss; Matthias Schmitt; James Stirrup; Ben Holloway; Deepa Gopalan; Aparna Deshpande; Gareth Morgan Hughes; Bobby Agrawal; Edward Nicol; Giles Roditi; James Shambrook; Russell Bull
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-03-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.