Literature DB >> 32583823

Metabolite collision cross section prediction without energy-minimized structures.

M T Soper-Hopper1, J Vandegrift, E S Baker, F M Fernández.   

Abstract

Matching experimental ion mobility-mass spectrometry data to computationally-generated collision cross section (CCS) values enables more confident metabolite identifications. Here, we show for the first time that accurately predicting CCS values with simple models for the largest library of metabolite cross sections is indeed possible, achieving a root mean square error of 7.0 Å2 (median error of ∼2%) using linear methods accesible to most researchers. A comparison on the performance of 2D vs. 3D molecular descriptors for the purposes of CCS prediction is also presented for the first time, enabling CCS prediction without a priori knowledge of the metabolite's energy-minimized structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32583823      PMCID: PMC7423765          DOI: 10.1039/d0an00198h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  23 in total

1.  Structural characterization of drug-like compounds by ion mobility mass spectrometry: comparison of theoretical and experimentally derived nitrogen collision cross sections.

Authors:  Iain Campuzano; Matthew F Bush; Carol V Robinson; Claire Beaumont; Keith Richardson; Hyungjun Kim; Hugh I Kim
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Collision cross section prediction of deprotonated phenolics in a travelling-wave ion mobility spectrometer using molecular descriptors and chemometrics.

Authors:  Gerard Bryan Gonzales; Guy Smagghe; Sofie Coelus; Dieter Adriaenssens; Karel De Winter; Tom Desmet; Katleen Raes; John Van Camp
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 3.  Advancing the large-scale CCS database for metabolomics and lipidomics at the machine-learning era.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhou; Jia Tu; Zheng-Jiang Zhu
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  The potential of ion mobility-mass spectrometry for non-targeted metabolomics.

Authors:  Teresa Mairinger; Tim J Causon; Stephan Hann
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Protomers: formation, separation and characterization via travelling wave ion mobility mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Priscila M Lalli; Bernardo A Iglesias; Henrique E Toma; Gilberto F de Sa; Romeu J Daroda; Juvenal C Silva Filho; Jan E Szulejko; Koiti Araki; Marcos N Eberlin
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.982

6.  Metabolomics and lipidomics using traveling-wave ion mobility mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Giuseppe Paglia; Giuseppe Astarita
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  An Interlaboratory Evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurements.

Authors:  Sarah M Stow; Tim J Causon; Xueyun Zheng; Ruwan T Kurulugama; Teresa Mairinger; Jody C May; Emma E Rennie; Erin S Baker; Richard D Smith; John A McLean; Stephan Hann; John C Fjeldsted
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  LipidCCS: Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Lipids with High Precision To Support Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry-Based Lipidomics.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhou; Jia Tu; Xin Xiong; Xiaotao Shen; Zheng-Jiang Zhu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  A structural examination and collision cross section database for over 500 metabolites and xenobiotics using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry.

Authors:  Xueyun Zheng; Noor A Aly; Yuxuan Zhou; Kevin T Dupuis; Aivett Bilbao; Vanessa L Paurus; Daniel J Orton; Ryan Wilson; Samuel H Payne; Richard D Smith; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Ion mobility derived collision cross sections to support metabolomics applications.

Authors:  Giuseppe Paglia; Jonathan P Williams; Lochana Menikarachchi; J Will Thompson; Richard Tyldesley-Worster; Skarphédinn Halldórsson; Ottar Rolfsson; Arthur Moseley; David Grant; James Langridge; Bernhard O Palsson; Giuseppe Astarita
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  5 in total

1.  Uncovering PFAS and Other Xenobiotics in the Dark Metabolome Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Mass Defect Analysis, and Machine Learning.

Authors:  MaKayla Foster; Markace Rainey; Chandler Watson; James N Dodds; Kaylie I Kirkwood; Facundo M Fernández; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.357

2.  Improving confidence in lipidomic annotations by incorporating empirical ion mobility regression analysis and chemical class prediction.

Authors:  Bailey S Rose; Jody C May; Jaqueline A Picache; Simona G Codreanu; Stacy D Sherrod; John A McLean
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.931

3.  High-Throughput Measurement and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Collision Cross Sections for Drugs and Drug Metabolites.

Authors:  Dylan H Ross; Ryan P Seguin; Allison M Krinsky; Libin Xu
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.262

4.  Target, suspect and non-target screening analysis from wastewater treatment plant effluents to drinking water using collision cross section values as additional identification criterion.

Authors:  Vanessa Hinnenkamp; Peter Balsaa; Torsten C Schmidt
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Prediction of Collision Cross Section Values: Application to Non-Intentionally Added Substance Identification in Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Xue-Chao Song; Nicola Dreolin; Tito Damiani; Elena Canellas; Cristina Nerin
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.