Literature DB >> 27181646

Collision cross section prediction of deprotonated phenolics in a travelling-wave ion mobility spectrometer using molecular descriptors and chemometrics.

Gerard Bryan Gonzales1, Guy Smagghe2, Sofie Coelus3, Dieter Adriaenssens3, Karel De Winter4, Tom Desmet4, Katleen Raes5, John Van Camp6.   

Abstract

The combination of ion mobility and mass spectrometry (MS) affords significant improvements over conventional MS/MS, especially in the characterization of isomeric metabolites due to the differences in their collision cross sections (CCS). Experimentally obtained CCS values are typically matched with theoretical CCS values from Trajectory Method (TM) and/or Projection Approximation (PA) calculations. In this paper, predictive models for CCS of deprotonated phenolics were developed using molecular descriptors and chemometric tools, stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR), principal components regression (PCR), and partial least squares regression (PLS). A total of 102 molecular descriptors were generated and reduced to 28 after employing a feature selection tool, composed of mass, topological descriptors, Jurs descriptors and shadow indices. Therefore, the generated models considered the effects of mass, 3D conformation and partial charge distribution on CCS, which are the main parameters for either TM or PA (only 3D conformation) calculations. All three techniques yielded highly predictive models for both the training (R(2)SMLR = 0.9911; R(2)PCR = 0.9917; R(2)PLS = 0.9918) and validation datasets (R(2)SMLR = 0.9489; R(2)PCR = 0.9761; R(2)PLS = 0.9760). Also, the high cross validated R(2) values indicate that the generated models are robust and highly predictive (Q(2)SMLR = 0.9859; Q(2)PCR = 0.9748; Q(2)PLS = 0.9760). The predictions were also very comparable to the results from TM calculations using modified mobcal (N2). Most importantly, this method offered a rapid (<10 min) alternative to TM calculations without compromising predictive ability. These methods could therefore be used in routine analysis and could be easily integrated to metabolite identification platforms.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Chemometrics; Collision cross section prediction; Flavonoids; Ion mobility; Mass spectrometry; Phenolics

Year:  2016        PMID: 27181646     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  11 in total

1.  Metabolite collision cross section prediction without energy-minimized structures.

Authors:  M T Soper-Hopper; J Vandegrift; E S Baker; F M Fernández
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  Investigation of the Complete Suite of the Leucine and Isoleucine Isomers: Toward Prediction of Ion Mobility Separation Capabilities.

Authors:  James N Dodds; Jody C May; John A McLean
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Traveling Wave Ion Mobility-Derived Collision Cross Section Database for Plant Specialized Metabolites: An Application to Ventilago harmandiana Pierre.

Authors:  Narumol Jariyasopit; Suphitcha Limjiasahapong; Alongkorn Kurilung; Sitanan Sartyoungkul; Pattipong Wisanpitayakorn; Narong Nuntasaen; Chutima Kuhakarn; Vichai Reutrakul; Prasat Kittakoop; Yongyut Sirivatanauksorn; Sakda Khoomrung
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 5.370

4.  Prediction of Collision Cross-Section Values for Extractables and Leachables from Plastic Products.

Authors:  Xue-Chao Song; Nicola Dreolin; Elena Canellas; Jeff Goshawk; Cristina Nerin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 5.  Recent Advances and Future Challenges in Modified Mycotoxin Analysis: Why HRMS Has Become a Key Instrument in Food Contaminant Research.

Authors:  Laura Righetti; Giuseppe Paglia; Gianni Galaverna; Chiara Dall'Asta
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Computational intelligence models to predict porosity of tablets using minimum features.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Khalid; Pezhman Kazemi; Lucia Perez-Gandarillas; Abderrahim Michrafy; Jakub Szlęk; Renata Jachowicz; Aleksander Mendyk
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  A structural examination and collision cross section database for over 500 metabolites and xenobiotics using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry.

Authors:  Xueyun Zheng; Noor A Aly; Yuxuan Zhou; Kevin T Dupuis; Aivett Bilbao; Vanessa L Paurus; Daniel J Orton; Ryan Wilson; Samuel H Payne; Richard D Smith; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 9.825

8.  A novel integrated non-targeted metabolomic analysis reveals significant metabolite variations between different lettuce (Lactuca sativa. L) varieties.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Shiwei Wei; Bin Liu; Doudou Guo; Bangxiao Zheng; Lei Feng; Yumin Liu; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán; Lijun Luo; Danfeng Huang
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 6.793

9.  An RP-LC-UV-TWIMS-HRMS and Chemometric Approach to Differentiate between Momordicabalsamina Chemotypes from Three Different Geographical Locations in Limpopo Province of South Africa.

Authors:  Pieter Venter; Kholofelo Malemela; Vusi Mbazima; Leseilane J Mampuru; Christo J F Muller; Sylvia Riedel
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Prediction of Collision Cross Section Values: Application to Non-Intentionally Added Substance Identification in Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Xue-Chao Song; Nicola Dreolin; Tito Damiani; Elena Canellas; Cristina Nerin
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.