Literature DB >> 32583062

Machine learning-based risk prediction of intrahospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.

Bruna Gomes1, Maximilian Pilz2, Christoph Reich1, Florian Leuschner1, Mathias Konstandin1, Hugo A Katus1, Benjamin Meder3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, patient selection in TAVI is based upon a multidisciplinary heart team assessment of patient comorbidities and surgical risk stratification. In an era of increasing need for precision medicine and quickly expanding TAVI indications, machine learning has shown promise in making accurate predictions of clinical outcomes. This study aims to predict different intrahospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI using a machine learning-based approach. The main clinical outcomes include all-cause mortality, stroke, major vascular complications, paravalvular leakage, and new pacemaker implantations. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The dataset consists of 451 consecutive patients undergoing elective TAVI between February 2014 and June 2016. The applied machine learning methods were neural networks, support vector machines, and random forests. Their performance was evaluated using five-fold nested cross-validation. Considering all 83 features, the performance of all machine learning models in predicting all-cause intrahospital mortality (AUC 0.94-0.97) was significantly higher than both the STS risk score (AUC 0.64), the STS/ACC TAVR score (AUC 0.65), and all machine learning models using baseline characteristics only (AUC 0.72-0.82). Using an extreme boosting gradient, baseline troponin T was found to be the most important feature among all input variables. Overall, after feature selection, there was a slightly inferior performance. Stroke, major vascular complications, paravalvular leakage, and new pacemaker implantations could not be accurately predicted.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning has the potential to improve patient selection and risk management of interventional cardiovascular procedures, as it is capable of making superior predictions compared to current logistic risk scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Risk assessment; TAVI

Year:  2020        PMID: 32583062     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-020-01691-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  10 in total

1.  [Digital Cardiology].

Authors:  Benjamin Meder; Peter Radke
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  Improvements of Procedural Results With a New-Generation Self-Expanding Transfemoral Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Comparison to the Old-Generation Device.

Authors:  Bruna Gomes; Nicolas A Geis; Emmanuel Chorianopoulos; Benjamin Meder; Florian Leuschner; Hugo A Katus; Raffi Bekeredjian
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Machine Learning Prediction Models for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Dagmar F Hernandez-Suarez; Yeunjung Kim; Pedro Villablanca; Tanush Gupta; Jose Wiley; Brenda G Nieves-Rodriguez; Jovaniel Rodriguez-Maldonado; Roberto Feliu Maldonado; Istoni da Luz Sant'Ana; Cristina Sanina; Pedro Cox-Alomar; Harish Ramakrishna; Angel Lopez-Candales; William W O'Neill; Duane S Pinto; Azeem Latib; Abiel Roche-Lima
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  SOURCE 3 Registry: Design and 30-Day Results of the European Postapproval Registry of the Latest Generation of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Authors:  Olaf Wendler; Gerhard Schymik; Hendrik Treede; Helmut Baumgartner; Nicolas Dumonteil; Leo Ihlberg; Franz-Josef Neumann; Giuseppe Tarantini; José Luis Zamarano; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet?

Authors:  Khader Shameer; Kipp W Johnson; Benjamin S Glicksberg; Joel T Dudley; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  The failing right heart: implications and evolution in high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Luca Testa; Azeem Latib; Federico De Marco; Marco De Carlo; Claudia Fiorina; Marco Barbanti; Rocco A Montone; Mauro Agnifili; Anna Sonia Petronio; Federica Ettori; Silvio Klugmann; Corrado Tamburino; Nedy Brambilla; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Bedogni
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 6.534

Review 7.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

Authors:  A Pieter Kappetein; Stuart J Head; Philippe Généreux; Nicolo Piazza; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Eugene H Blackstone; Thomas G Brott; David J Cohen; Donald E Cutlip; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Rebecca T Hahn; Ajay J Kirtane; Mitchell W Krucoff; Susheel Kodali; Michael J Mack; Roxana Mehran; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Pascal Vranckx; John G Webb; Stephan Windecker; Patrick W Serruys; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery.

Authors:  Sean M O'Brien; David M Shahian; Giovanni Filardo; Victor A Ferraris; Constance K Haan; Jeffrey B Rich; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Elizabeth R DeLong; Cynthia M Shewan; Rachel S Dokholyan; Eric D Peterson; Fred H Edwards; Richard P Anderson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Natural language processing to extract symptoms of severe mental illness from clinical text: the Clinical Record Interactive Search Comprehensive Data Extraction (CRIS-CODE) project.

Authors:  Richard G Jackson; Rashmi Patel; Nishamali Jayatilleke; Anna Kolliakou; Michael Ball; Genevieve Gorrell; Angus Roberts; Richard J Dobson; Robert Stewart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Machine learning models for early sepsis recognition in the neonatal intensive care unit using readily available electronic health record data.

Authors:  Aaron J Masino; Mary Catherine Harris; Daniel Forsyth; Svetlana Ostapenko; Lakshmi Srinivasan; Christopher P Bonafide; Fran Balamuth; Melissa Schmatz; Robert W Grundmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Using Machine Learning Techniques to Predict MACE in Very Young Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Pablo Juan-Salvadores; Cesar Veiga; Víctor Alfonso Jiménez Díaz; Alba Guitián González; Cristina Iglesia Carreño; Cristina Martínez Reglero; José Antonio Baz Alonso; Francisco Caamaño Isorna; Andrés Iñiguez Romo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06

2.  Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Yuheng Jia; Gaden Luosang; Yiming Li; Jianyong Wang; Pengyu Li; Tianyuan Xiong; Yijian Li; Yanbiao Liao; Zhengang Zhao; Yong Peng; Yuan Feng; Weili Jiang; Wenjian Li; Xinpei Zhang; Zhang Yi; Mao Chen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.790

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.