Literature DB >> 23084102

Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

A Pieter Kappetein1, Stuart J Head, Philippe Généreux, Nicolo Piazza, Nicolas M van Mieghem, Eugene H Blackstone, Thomas G Brott, David J Cohen, Donald E Cutlip, Gerrit-Anne van Es, Rebecca T Hahn, Ajay J Kirtane, Mitchell W Krucoff, Susheel Kodali, Michael J Mack, Roxana Mehran, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Pascal Vranckx, John G Webb, Stephan Windecker, Patrick W Serruys, Martin B Leon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 initiative was to revisit the selection and definitions of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) clinical endpoints to make them more suitable to the present and future needs of clinical trials. In addition, this document is intended to expand the understanding of patient risk stratification and case selection.
BACKGROUND: A recent study confirmed that VARC definitions have already been incorporated into clinical and research practice and represent a new standard for consistency in reporting clinical outcomes of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI. However, as the clinical experience with this technology has matured and expanded, certain definitions have become unsuitable or ambiguous. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Two in-person meetings (held in September 2011 in Washington, DC, and in February 2012 in Rotterdam, The Netherlands) involving VARC study group members, independent experts (including surgeons, interventional and noninterventional cardiologists, imaging specialists, neurologists, geriatric specialists, and clinical trialists), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and industry representatives, provided much of the substantive discussion from which this VARC-2 consensus manuscript was derived. This document provides an overview of risk assessment and patient stratification that need to be considered for accurate patient inclusion in studies. Working groups were assigned to define the following clinical endpoints: mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, bleeding complications, acute kidney injury, vascular complications, conduction disturbances and arrhythmias, and a miscellaneous category including relevant complications not previously categorized. Furthermore, comprehensive echocardiographic recommendations are provided for the evaluation of prosthetic valve (dys)function. Definitions for the quality of life assessments are also reported. These endpoints formed the basis for several recommended composite endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: This VARC-2 document has provided further standardization of endpoint definitions for studies evaluating the use of TAVI, which will lead to improved comparability and interpretability of the study results, supplying an increasingly growing body of evidence with respect to TAVI and/or surgical aortic valve replacement. This initiative and document can furthermore be used as a model during current endeavors of applying definitions to other transcatheter valve therapies (for example, mitral valve repair).
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23084102     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  149 in total

1.  Case report: Cerebral stentretreiver thrombectomy of an embolized valve fragment after valve in valve TAVI.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Gülker; Peter Schott; Marcus Katoh; Alexander Bufe
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Predictors for non-delayed discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: utility of echocardiographic parameters.

Authors:  Tomoo Nagai; Hitomi Horinouchi; Yohei Ohno; Tsutomu Murakami; Katsuaki Sakai; Gaku Nakazawa; Koichiro Yoshioka; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Outcomes with a latest generation self-expandable, intra-annular, re-sheathable transcatheter heart valve system: analysis of patients with impaired left ventricular function and determinants for pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Andreas Schaefer; Niklas Neumann; Matthias Linder; Niklas Schofer; Yvonne Schneeberger; Florian Deuschl; Gerhard Schoen; Stefan Blankenberg; Hermann Reichenspurner; Lenard Conradi; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Imaging to select and guide transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  José Luis Zamorano; Alexandra Gonçalves; Roberto Lang
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot; Jean-Gaston Dumesnil
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry (SU-AVR-IR): design and rationale from the International Valvular Surgery Study Group (IVSSG).

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Thierry Folliguet; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Francesco Alamanni; Alberto Albertini; Gopal Bhatnagar; Michel Carrier; Stephen Clark; Federic Collart; Utz Kappert; Alfred Kocher; Bart Meuris; Carmelo Mignosa; Ahmed Ouda; Marc Pelletier; Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian; David Reineke; Kevin Teoh; Giovanni Troise; Emmanuel Villa; Thorsten Wahlers; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

7.  Clinical experience with trans-catheter aortic valve implantation at a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Richard Tanner; Barbara Moran; Ronan Margey; Gavin Blake; Catherine McGorrian; Jacqueline Geraghty; Susan Groarke; Jana Boleckova; John Hurley; Andrew Roy; David Barton; Declan Sugrue; Ivan P Casserly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in TAVR Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Balaji Tamarappoo; Donghee Han; Jeffrey Tyler; Tarun Chakravarty; Yuka Otaki; Robert Miller; Evann Eisenberg; Siddharth Singh; Takahiro Shiota; Robert Siegel; Jasminka Stegic; Tracy Salseth; Wen Cheng; Damini Dey; Louise Thomson; Daniel Berman; John Friedman; Raj Makkar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28

9.  Incidence and impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hatim Seoudy; Nathalie Güßefeld; Johanne Frank; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Georg Lutter; Matthias Eden; Ashraf Yusuf Rangrez; Christian Kuhn; Norbert Frey; Derk Frank
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Kazuaki Tanabe
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.