Literature DB >> 32583038

External evaluation of the Briganti nomogram to predict lymph node metastases in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

Nicolas Peilleron1, Arnaud Seigneurin2,3, Caroline Herault3, Camille Verry4, Michel Bolla4, Jean-Jacques Rambeaud1, Jean-Luc Descotes1,2, Jean-Alexandre Long1,2, Gaelle Fiard5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Briganti nomogram can be used with a threshold of 5% to decide when to offer lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy. The objective of the study was to assess the accuracy of the Briganti nomogram on intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients managed in a single academic department.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of all patients managed by radical prostatectomy (RP) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (BPLND) in our center between 2005 and 2017. The overall accuracy of the model in predicting metastatic lymph node disease was quantified by the construction of a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. A calibration plot was drawn to represent the relationship between the predicted and observed frequencies.
RESULTS: We included 285 patients, among whom 175 (61.4%) were classified as intermediate risk as defined by D'Amico. The median follow-up was 60 (34-93) months. Twenty-seven patients (9.5%) were diagnosed with lymph node metastases. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 10 (7-14). The mean Briganti score was 19.3% in patients with lymph node involvement (LNI) and 6.3% in patients without LNI. Focusing on intermediate-risk patients, 91(52%) and 84 (48%) had a Briganti score < 5% and ≥ 5%, respectively, among whom 6 (6.6%) and 7(8.3%) had lymph node metastases. The accuracy of the score was low for intermediate risk patients with an area under the curve (AUC) of 53.1% (95% CI 0.45-0.61).
CONCLUSION: The Briganti nomogram in our retrospective cohort showed low accuracy for the prediction of lymph node involvement in an intermediate-risk prostate cancer population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymph node dissection; Nomogram; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32583038     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03322-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  17 in total

1.  Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Alessandro Larcher; Firas Abdollah; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Marco Bianchi; Maxine Sun; Massimo Freschi; Andrea Salonia; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mathieu Roumiguié; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Thomas Filleron; Thibaut Benoit; Pascal Rischmann; Alexandre de la Taille; Laurent Salomon; Michel Soulié; Bernard Malavaud; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Radiotherapy and short-term androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher U Jones; Daniel Hunt; David G McGowan; Mahul B Amin; Michael P Chetner; Deborah W Bruner; Mark H Leibenhaut; Siraj M Husain; Marvin Rotman; Luis Souhami; Howard M Sandler; William U Shipley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Giuseppe Zanni; Vincenzo Scattoni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  External validation of nomogram predicting the probability of specimen-confined disease (pT2-3a, R0N0) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Luigi Mearini; Mauro Gacci; Omar Saleh; Cosimo De Nunzio; Riccardo Schiavina; Alchiede Simonato; Andrea Tubaro; Giorgio Carmignani; Vincenzo Mirone; Marco Carini; Vittorio Bini; Massimo Porena
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Identifying the best candidate for radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Steven Joniau; Paolo Gontero; Firas Abdollah; Niccolò M Passoni; Bertrand Tombal; Giansilvio Marchioro; Burkhard Kneitz; Jochen Walz; Detlef Frohneberg; Chris H Bangma; Markus Graefen; Alessandro Tizzani; Bruno Frea; R Jeffrey Karnes; Francesco Montorsi; Hein Van Poppel; Martin Spahn
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Nicola Fossati; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Vsevolod B Matveev; Paul C Moldovan; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Thomas Van den Broeck; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Thomas Wiegel; Philip Cornford
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Carsten H Ohlmann; Sergej Polyakov
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  External validation of the European association of urology recommendations for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Paolo Dell'Oglio; Firas Abdollah; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Vito Cucchiara; Damiano Vizziello; Emanuele Zaffuto; Francesco Cantiello; Rocco Damiano; Sharhokh Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  2 in total

1.  External Validation and Comparison of Two Nomograms Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Patients subjected to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Concomitant Lymph Node Dissection: A Single Tertiary Center Experience in the MRI-Era.

Authors:  Nicola Frego; Marco Paciotti; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Davide Maffei; Roberto Contieri; Pier Paolo Avolio; Vittorio Fasulo; Alessandro Uleri; Massimo Lazzeri; Rodolfo Hurle; Alberto Saita; Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni; Paolo Casale; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

2.  A Web-Based Prediction Model for Cancer-Specific Survival of Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery With Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Zhang; Chenghao Zhanghuang; Jinkui Wang; Tao Mi; Jiayan Liu; Xiaomao Tian; Liming Jin; Dawei He
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.