Literature DB >> 22153925

Identifying the best candidate for radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Alberto Briganti1, Steven Joniau, Paolo Gontero, Firas Abdollah, Niccolò M Passoni, Bertrand Tombal, Giansilvio Marchioro, Burkhard Kneitz, Jochen Walz, Detlef Frohneberg, Chris H Bangma, Markus Graefen, Alessandro Tizzani, Bruno Frea, R Jeffrey Karnes, Francesco Montorsi, Hein Van Poppel, Martin Spahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current role of radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with high-risk disease remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To identify which high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients might have favorable pathologic outcomes when surgically treated. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated 1366 patients with high-risk PCa (ie, at least one of the following risk factors: prostate-specific antigen [PSA]>20 ng/ml, cT3, biopsy Gleason 8-10) treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at eight European centers between 1987 and 2009. A favorable pathologic outcome was defined as specimen-confined (SC) disease-namely, pT2-pT3a, node negative PCa with negative surgical margins. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and PLND. MEASUREMENTS: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models tested the association between predictors and SC disease. A logistic regression coefficient-based nomogram was developed and internally validated using 200 bootstrap resamples. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to depict biochemical recurrence (BCR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 505 of 1366 patients (37%) had SC disease at RP. All preoperative variables (ie, age and PSA at surgery, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason sum) were independent predictors of SC PCa at RP (all p≤0.04). Patients with SC disease had significantly higher 10-yr BCR-free survival and CSS rates than patients without SC disease at RP (66% vs 47% and 98 vs 88%, respectively; all p<0.001). A nomogram including PSA, age, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason sum demonstrated 72% accuracy in predicting SC PCa. This study is limited by its retrospective design and by the lack of an external validation of the nomogram.
CONCLUSIONS: Roughly 40% of patients with high-risk PCa have SC disease at final pathology. These patients showed excellent long-term outcomes when surgically treated, thus representing the ideal candidates for RP as the primary treatment for PCa. Prediction of such patients is possible using a nomogram based on routinely available clinical parameters.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22153925     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  30 in total

1.  External evaluation of the Briganti nomogram to predict lymph node metastases in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicolas Peilleron; Arnaud Seigneurin; Caroline Herault; Camille Verry; Michel Bolla; Jean-Jacques Rambeaud; Jean-Luc Descotes; Jean-Alexandre Long; Gaelle Fiard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Karen A Autio; Mack Roach; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Bach; Sailaja Pisipati; Datesh Daneshwar; Mark Wright; Edward Rowe; David Gillatt; Raj Persad; Anthony Koupparis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Impact of stage migration and practice changes on high-risk prostate cancer: results from patients treated with radical prostatectomy over the last two decades.

Authors:  Nicola Fossati; Niccolò M Passoni; Marco Moschini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Alessandro Larcher; Massimo Freschi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Consensus statement on definition, diagnosis, and management of high-risk prostate cancer patients on behalf of the Spanish Groups of Uro-Oncology Societies URONCOR, GUO, and SOGUG.

Authors:  I Henríquez; A Rodríguez-Antolín; J Cassinello; C Gonzalez San Segundo; M Unda; E Gallardo; J López-Torrecilla; A Juarez; J Arranz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Heterogeneous oncologic outcomes according to surgical pathology in high-risk prostate cancer: implications for better risk stratification and preoperative prediction of oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Seung-Kwon Choi; Myungsun Shim; Myong Kim; Myungchan Park; Sangmi Lee; Cheryn Song; Hyung-Lae Lee; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Older patients with low Charlson score and high-risk prostate cancer benefit from radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Sivaraman; G Ordaz Jurado; X Cathelineau; Eric Barret; P Dell'Oglio; S Joniau; M Bianchi; A Briganti; M Spahn; P Bastian; J Chun; P Chlosta; P Gontero; M Graefen; R Jeffrey Karnes; G Marchioro; B Tombal; L Tosco; H Henk van der Poel; R Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Very High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Outcomes Following Definitive Radiation.

Authors:  Amol K Narang; Carol Gergis; Scott P Robertson; Pei He; Ashwin N Ram; Todd R McNutt; Emily Griffith; Theodore A DeWeese; Stephanie Honig; Harleen Singh; Danny Y Song; Phuoc T Tran; Theodore L DeWeese
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  How radical prostatectomy procedures have changed over the last 10 years in Italy: a comparative analysis based on more than 1500 patients participating in the MIRROR-SIU/LUNA and the Pros-IT CNR study.

Authors:  Mauro Gacci; Walter Artibani; Pierfrancesco Bassi; Filippo Bertoni; Sergio Bracarda; Alberto Briganti; Giorgio Carmignani; Luca Carmignani; Giario Conti; Renzo Corvò; Cosimo De Nunzio; Ferdinando Fusco; Pierpaolo Graziotti; Isabella Greco; Stefania Maggi; Stefano Maria Magrini; Vincenzo Mirone; Rodolfo Montironi; Giuseppe Morgia; Giovanni Muto; Marianna Noale; Stefano Pecoraro; Angelo Porreca; Umberto Ricardi; Elvio Russi; Giorgio Russo; Andrea Salonia; Alchiede Simonato; Sergio Serni; Davide Tomasini; Andrea Tubaro; Vittorina Zagonel; Gaetano Crepaldi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; John B Eifler; Kipp Voth; Elias S Hyams; Misop Han; Christian P Pavlovich; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Alan W Partin; Mohamad E Allaf; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.