| Literature DB >> 32581686 |
Benedict Mc Larney1,2, Magdalena Anastasia Hutter2, Oleksiy Degtyaruk2,3, Xosé Luís Deán-Ben3,4, Daniel Razansky1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Sensory stimulation is an attractive paradigm for studying brain activity using various optical-, ultrasound- and MRI-based functional neuroimaging methods. Optoacoustics has been recently suggested as a powerful new tool for scalable mapping of multiple hemodynamic parameters with rich contrast and previously unachievable spatio-temporal resolution. Yet, its utility for studying the processing of peripheral inputs at the whole brain level has so far not been quantified. We employed volumetric multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography (vMSOT) to non-invasively monitor the HbO, HbR, and HbT dynamics across the mouse somatosensory cortex evoked by electrical paw stimuli. We show that elevated contralateral activation is preserved in the HbO map (invisible to MRI) under isoflurane anesthesia. Brain activation is shown to be predominantly confined to the somatosensory cortex, with strongest activation in the hindpaw region of the contralateral sensorimotor cortex. Furthermore, vMSOT detected the presence of an initial dip in the contralateral hindpaw region in the delta HbO channel. Sensorimotor cortical activity was identified over all other regions in HbT and HbO but not in HbR. Pearson's correlation mapping enabled localizing the response to the sensorimotor cortex further highlighting the ability of vMSOT to bridge over imaging performance deficiencies of other functional neuroimaging modalities.Entities:
Keywords: cortex; hemodynamics; initial-dip; optoacoustics; somatosensory
Year: 2020 PMID: 32581686 PMCID: PMC7283916 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
FIGURE 1(A) Lay-out of the experimental set-up for inducing and monitoring hemodynamic responses in mice using volumetric multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography (vMSOT). Both the image acquisition and paw stimulation are synchronized via the laser trigger. The physiological monitoring device allows consistent monitoring of the mouse to ensure anesthesia is maintained at 1–1.5% isoflurane levels. DAQ, Data Acquisition Unit. (B) Molar extinction coefficient for HbO and HbR in the visible spectrum of light (Jacques, 2013a). Superimposed are the wavelengths that were used for imaging. (C) Paw stimulation paradigm similar to that used in fMRI to elicit the hemodynamic response (Schroeter et al., 2014).
FIGURE 2(A) Spectrally unmixed distributions of HbT, HbO, and HbR estimated with vMSOT including slice locations. (B) Left, the ipsilateral (IL) traces (large dotted lines) for HbT, HbO, and HbR from the IL ROI highlighted in dotted green in the middle image. Middle, Pearson’s correlation mapping of the activity [-2.0 mm from Bregma – primarily visual cortex (VC) regions]. Right, the contralateral (CL) traces from the same area (solid green ROI). The SS area is outlined. (C) Left, IL traces for HbT, HbO, and HbR from the IL ROI highlighted in dotted green in the middle image [at Bregma – primarily hind paw (HP) somatosensory regions]. Middle, Pearsons correlation mapping highlighting the extent of activity. Right, the CL traces from the same area (solid green ROI). Seed voxels located within the CL-HP ROI were used for correlation mapping. HP regions of the SS cortex are highlighted (blue lines) as well as the SS cortex (gray outline). (D) Left, traces for HbT, HbO and HbR from the IL ROI highlighted in dotted green in the middle image (+2.0 mm from Bregma – primarily somatomotor cortex regions). Middle, Pearsons correlation mapping at this location. Right, CL traces from the same area (solid green ROI). Legend – IL, Ipsilateral; CL, Contralateral; HP, Hindpaw region of somatosensory cortex; SS, Somatosensory cortex; Br, Brain Outline. The average response from all trials from each mouse is plotted as a lightly dotted line in all cases. The bold line represents the averaged response from all mice.
FIGURE 3(A) Illustration showing how all components were calculated along with a legend for all box plots, these are the same bold traces as shown in Figure 2C, right panel. Components not shown were not significant and are outlined in Supplementary Figure S1. Analysis was carried out on each trace based on the average of the voxels within the ROIs shown in Figure 2 for each mouse (n = 4) and each trial (n = 2 per mouse, 8 trials in total). (B) Peak percentage changes (P%) for all components. Bregma (somatosensory) regions were found to be statistically significant from its L counterpart in both HbT and HbO channels and -2.0 mm (visual cortex) was significant in the HbO channel. No statistical significance could be found between the bregma CL and IL region in the HbR channel. The CL-HP region was found to be statistically significant in HbT and HbO over all other regions. (C) Decay Time (DeT) for all components. Statistical significance was found in the HbR channel between the IL and CL -2.0 mm region. The CL-HP region was found to be significant over the IL visual region. Times were calculated based on the 10th and 90th percentile signal change. Outliers are marked by dots marked with a cross. Each black dot represents an individual measurement from all trials from all mice (8 dots per box). Statistical significance was determined in all cases via a Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing ipsilateral to contralateral regions for each component. P-values are shown when significant (p < 0.05).