| Literature DB >> 32576690 |
Longhui Deng1, Damian Bölsterli2, Erik Kristensen3, Christof Meile4, Chih-Chieh Su5, Stefano Michele Bernasconi6, Marit-Solveig Seidenkrantz7, Clemens Glombitza2,8, Lorenzo Lagostina2, Xingguo Han2, Bo Barker Jørgensen8, Hans Røy8, Mark Alexander Lever1.
Abstract
Through a process called "bioturbation," burrowing macrofauna have altered the seafloor habitat and modified global carbon cycling since the Cambrian. However, the impact of macrofauna on the cEntities:
Keywords: bioturbation; burrow ventilation; organic carbon sources; particle reworking; redox state
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32576690 PMCID: PMC7376573 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917494117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Geochemical characterizations and indicators of bioturbation activity at AU1 to AU4. (A) Depth profiles of SO42−, CH4, DIC, TOC, δ13C-TOC, and C:N ratios across the entire cored intervals. Ventilation-dominated layers (VLs), reworking-dominated layers (RLs), and sulfate–methane transitions (SMTs) are indicated by horizontal dashed, solid, and dotted lines, respectively. (B) Bioturbation activities indicated by profiles of chl a, modeled rates of biodiffusional mixing (DB), nonlocal mixing (Na), and bioirrigation (α), as well as % Fe(III) in the top 0 to 40 cm. (C) Composition of macrofaunal communities, based on counts of individuals.
Fig. 2.Depth profiles of microbial communities at AU1 to AU4. (A) 16S rRNA gene abundances of Bacteria and Archaea (red triangles, Bacteria; blue diamonds, Archaea); (B) Bacteria-to-Archaea ratios (BARs); (C) Chao1 richness of Bacteria and Archaea; (D and E) community compositions of Bacteria and Archaea. The VLs, RLs, and SMTs are indicated by horizontal dashed, solid, and dotted lines, respectively. The black arrows indicate local peaks in chl a or excess 210Pb from Fig. 1.
Fig. 3.Ordination analyses of microbial community composition and its environmental drivers. (A) PCoA plots of bacterial and archaeal communities based on weighted Unifrac distances. Clusters consisting of samples from VLs, RLs, and nonbioturbated layers are shaded in deep blue, light blue, and red, respectively. Intercluster dissimilarities analyzed by PERMANOVA were highly significant (P < 0.001) in all cases. (B) Relationships between microbial communities and environmental variables examined by CAP. The asterisks indicate significance levels based on PERMANOVA (***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01).
Fig. 4.Depth profiles of 18S rRNA gene abundances and community composition. Photosynthetic lineages, i.e., Bacillariophyta, Dinoflagellata, Chlorophyta, and Streptophyta, are indicated by green colors.
Fig. 5.Conceptual path model to investigate the relationships between bioturbation activity, sediment biogeochemistry, and microbial and eukaryotic community structure: (A) surface sediments (0 to 40 cm) and (B) subsurface sediments (>40 cm). The red and blue colors distinguish solid-phase (DB, Na) and solute-phase (α) bioturbation parameters. All calculations are based on PLS regression, VPA-RDA, and Mantel test. Widths of arrows and wave lines are proportional to the explanatory power of VPA-RDA variables and Mantel coefficients, respectively. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.5. Note: Surface and subsurface sediments are divided at 40 cm based on Fig. 1. Changing this division to other depths does not significantly alter the statistical outcomes, however ().
Fig. 6.Pairwise Spearman correlations of relative abundances of (A) bacterial and (B) archaeal lineages with environmental variables and relative abundances of dominant eukaryotic groups. Only significant (P < 0.05) correlations are shown. The asterisks mark which environmental variable shows the strongest correlation with each given microbial lineage. Note: Correlations of α, %Fe(III), DB, Na, and chl a with microbial lineages were only calculated for surface sediment where data exist for both.