Literature DB >> 32576114

Earlier springs enable high-Arctic wolf spiders to produce a second clutch.

Toke T Høye1, Jean-Claude Kresse1, Amanda M Koltz2, Joseph J Bowden3,4.   

Abstract

Spiders at southern latitudes commonly produce multiple clutches, but this has not been observed at high latitudes where activity seasons are much shorter. Yet the timing of snowmelt is advancing in the Arctic, which may allow some species to produce an additional clutch. To determine if this is already happening, we used specimens of the wolf spider Pardosa glacialis caught by pitfall traps from the long-term (1996-2014) monitoring programme at Zackenberg, NE Greenland. We dissected individual egg sacs and counted the number of eggs and partially developed juveniles, and measured carapace width of the mothers. Upon the discovery of a bimodal frequency distribution of clutch sizes, as is typical for wolf spiders at lower latitudes producing a second clutch, we assigned egg sacs to being a first or second clutch depending on clutch size. We tested whether the median capture date differed among first and second clutches, whether clutch size was correlated to female size, and whether the proportion of second clutches produced within a season was related to climate. We found that assigned second clutches appeared significantly later in the season than first clutches. In years with earlier snowmelt, first clutches occurred earlier and the proportion of second clutches produced was larger. Likely, females produce their first clutch earlier in those years which allow them time to produce another clutch. Clutch size for first clutches was correlated to female size, while this was not the case for second clutches. Our results provide the first evidence for Arctic invertebrates producing additional clutches in response to warming. This could be a common but overlooked phenomenon due to the challenges associated with long-term collection of life-history data in the Arctic. Moreover, given that wolf spiders are a widely distributed, important tundra predator, we may expect to see population and food web consequences of their increased reproductive rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthropods; climate change; life-history variation; phenology; reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32576114      PMCID: PMC7329030          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  The effects of phenological mismatches on demography.

Authors:  Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Toke Thomas Høye; David W Inouye; Eric Post
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  High-Arctic butterflies become smaller with rising temperatures.

Authors:  Joseph J Bowden; Anne Eskildsen; Rikke R Hansen; Kent Olsen; Carolyn M Kurle; Toke T Høye
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Christiaan Both
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Rapid advancement of spring in the High Arctic.

Authors:  Toke T Høye; Eric Post; Hans Meltofte; Niels M Schmidt; Mads C Forchhammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Climate change and sexual size dimorphism in an Arctic spider.

Authors:  Toke Thomas Høye; Jörg U Hammel; Thomas Fuchs; Søren Toft
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Reproductive success and foraging of the crab spider Misumena vatia.

Authors:  Robert S Fritz; Douglass H Morse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Climate change alters the reproductive phenology and investment of a lacustrine fish, the three-spine stickleback.

Authors:  Rachel A Hovel; Stephanie M Carlson; Thomas P Quinn
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Mountain pine beetle develops an unprecedented summer generation in response to climate warming.

Authors:  Jeffry B Mitton; Scott M Ferrenberg
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Meter scale variation in shrub dominance and soil moisture structure Arctic arthropod communities.

Authors:  Rikke Reisner Hansen; Oskar Liset Pryds Hansen; Joseph J Bowden; Urs A Treier; Signe Normand; Toke Høye
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  An ecosystem-wide reproductive failure with more snow in the Arctic.

Authors:  Niels Martin Schmidt; Jeroen Reneerkens; Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen; Martin Olesen; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  3 in total

1.  Nonlinear trends in abundance and diversity and complex responses to climate change in Arctic arthropods.

Authors:  Toke T Høye; Sarah Loboda; Amanda M Koltz; Mark A K Gillespie; Joseph J Bowden; Niels M Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Earlier springs enable high-Arctic wolf spiders to produce a second clutch.

Authors:  Toke T Høye; Jean-Claude Kresse; Amanda M Koltz; Joseph J Bowden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Biogeographic position and body size jointly set lower thermal limits of wandering spiders.

Authors:  Jérémy Monsimet; Hervé Colinet; Olivier Devineau; Denis Lafage; Julien Pétillon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.