| Literature DB >> 32575814 |
Patricia Gullón1, Gonzalo Astray2,3, Beatriz Gullón4, Igor Tomasevic5, José M Lorenzo6,7.
Abstract
In the last few years, the consumer's concern with the relationship between health and diet has led to the search of foods with functional properties beyond the nutritional. In this framework, the consumption of pomegranate has increased due to their sensorial attributes and remarkable amounts of bioactive compounds, which generate, at the same time, huge amounts of by-products. A search in the Scopus database for the last 10 years has revealed the rising interest in pomegranate peel (PP), the main residue from this fruit. The meat industry is a food sector that has had to search for new alternatives to substitute the use of synthetic preservatives by new natural additives, to extend the self-life and keep the quality attributes of their processed products. This review sets out the main bioactivities of PP extracts, and their incorporation in meat products is elaborated. PP is a good source of bioactive compounds, including phenolic acids, flavonoids and hydrolyzable tannins, which have beneficial health effects. It can be concluded that the reformulation of meat products with PP extracts is a suitable strategy for enhancing their technological characteristics, in addition to conferring functional properties that make them healthier and potentially more acceptable for the consumer.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive compounds; meat products; oxidative stability; pomegranate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32575814 PMCID: PMC7355679 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25122859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structure of some biomolecules identified in pomegranate peel [26].
Extraction technologies to obtain bioactive compounds from pomegranate peels, as well as the analytical techniques reported for their identification.
| Technology | Extraction Conditions | Identification Method | Outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLE | Methanol: water (4:1, | HPLC-PDA | TPC: 188.9 mg GAE/g dw; TFC: 13.95 mg QE/g dw | [ |
| CPE | For total phenols: 8.22% Triton X-114, 4% NaCl at 36.80 °C and pH 4 | Not indicated | TPC: 205.2 mg of GAE/g; TFC: 60.05 mg of QE/g | [ |
| SLE, IR and UAE | Solvents: water, 50% ethanol and 8 different DES. The temperature for the three technologies was fixed at 50 °C | HPLC-DAD | The combination of DES and IR leads to the highest yield of polyphenols (152 mg/g) with high antioxidant activity and good antimicrobial properties. | [ |
| MAE and UAE | For MAE: 50% aqueous ethanol; LSR: 60:1 mL/g; power, 600 W for 4 min | HPLC-UV–vis | TPC (MAE): 199.4 mg GAE/g; TPC (UAE): 119.82 mg GAE/g. | [ |
| MASE | TPC: 600 W, 24% ethanol for 35 min; TFC: 800 W, 30% ethanol for 25 min; TTC: 800 W, 30% ethanol for 15 min | UHPLC/ESI/MS | TPC: 373 mg GAE/g; TFC: 155 mg RE/g; TTC: 317 mg GAE/g. | [ |
| PUAE | Intensity level: 105 W/cm2; duty cycle: 50% for 10 min | HPLC-UV-DAD | Punicalagin: 146.58 mg/g; ellagic acid: 20.66 mg/g; gallic acid: 0.053 mg/g | [ |
| UAE | Ultrasonic amplitude 60% for 6.2 min | Not indicated | Yield: 13.1%; TPC: 42.2 mg GAE/g; DPPH: 88%; FRAP: 1824.6 μmol Fe2+/g; IC50: 0.51 mg/mL | [ |
| UAE | Ultrasonic power of 148 W, 55 °C for 63 min using LSR: 24 mL/g | Not indicated | Polysaccharide yield: 13.658% | [ |
| HIFU | Choline chloride:acetic acid:water (1:1:10 M), amplitude of 60% for 11 min | HPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS | Protein: 20 mg/g. | [ |
| HPE | Depending on the variable evaluated, the conditions ranged between 356 and 600 MPa and 32–80% ethanol for 23–30 min | UHPLC-DAD/LC-DAD/ESI-MS | Yield: 31 mg/g; TPC: 52 mg GAE/g; TFC: 20 mg of QE/g; TTC: 2.02 mg of CAE/g; TAC: 86 mg cyd-3-glu/g; ABTS: 269 mg TE/g; DPPH: 314 mg TE/g; FRAP: 436 mg TE/g | [ |
| HPE + EE | HPE conditions: 300 MPa for 15 min; EE: 4% pectinase and 4% cellulase for 15 min | HPLC-DAD-MSn | Total extraction yield: 41%; TPC: 207 mg GAE/g; DPPH: 334 mg TE/g | [ |
| EASCFE | EE: cocktail enzyme (mixture of cellulase, pectinase and protease; 50:25:25) at 3.8%, 49 °C, pH 6.7 for 85 min; SCFE: ethanol as co-solvent (2 g/min), 55 °C, 300 bar for 100–120 min | HPLC-DAD-ESI–MS | TPC: 301.53 mg GAE/g | [ |
TPC: total phenolic compounds; TFC: total flavonoid compounds; TTC: total tannin content; TAC: total anthocyanins content; GAE: gallic acid equivalents; QE: quercetin equivalents; RE: rutin equivalents; CAE: catechin equivalents; TE: Trolox equivalents; cyd-3-glu: cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents; CPE: cloud point extraction; SLE: solid–liquid extraction; DES: deep eutectic solvents; MAE: microwave-assisted extraction; MASE: microwave-assisted soxhlet extraction; PUAE: pulsed ultrasound-assisted extraction; UAPLE: ultrasound and pressurized liquid extraction; HIFU: high intensity focused ultrasounds; HPE: high pressure extraction; EE: enzymatic extraction; EASCFE: enzyme-assisted supercritical fluid extraction.
Meat products reformulated with pomegranate peel extracts.
| Meat Product | Material | Amount Used | Storage Conditions | Main Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beef meatballs | PPAE | 0.5% and 1% | Refrigerated at 4 °C for 8 days | Decrease of lipid and protein oxidation. Prevents rancid odor formation. Improved shelf life | [ |
| Frozen at −18 °C for 6 months | [ | ||||
| LPP-NPs | 1% and 1.5% | Refrigerated at 4 °C for 15 days | Decreased peroxide, TBARS and total volatile base nitrogen contents. Improved microbiological quality. No negative impact on sensory properties | [ | |
| Minced beef meat | PPEE | 0.1%, 0.5% and 1% | Refrigerated at 4 °C for 21 days | Reduction of oxidative deterioration. Inhibition of growth of spoilage microorganisms. Higher score for color, appearance, odor and overall acceptability | [ |
| Raw ground pork meat | PRPE | 0.02% | Refrigerated at 4 °C for 12 days | Reduction in peroxide and TBARS values. Decreased lightness value. Better overall acceptability of the treated samples | [ |
| Frankfurter | PRPE | 10 mg GAE/100 g | Refrigerated 4 °C for 60 days | Reduction in peroxide and TBARS values. Increase in L* value and reduction in a* and b* values | [ |
| Cooked sausages | Naturmix WM® | 5‰ and 10 ‰ | Refrigerated at 4 °C for 60 days in vacuum-packaged | Delay of the growth of total viable count, psychrotrophic microbial counts and | [ |
| Beef burgers | PRPE | 0.01% | Frozen at −18 °C for 90 days | Retarded lipid oxidation. Reduced growth of aerobic bacteria. Improved the overall acceptability of the product | [ |
| Beef patties | PP | 10 g/kg | Refrigerated at 4 °C for 12 days in a high O2 atmosphere | Reduction in TBARS levels. Decrease redness value. Modified the texture and taste | [ |
| Lamb patties | POM | 1000 mg/kg | Refrigerated at 2 °C for 7 days | Reduced the growth of mesophile bacteria and psychrotrophic bacteria | [ |
| Chicken patties | PP/PPAE | 2% and 6% | Refrigerated at 4 °C for 16 days | Increased the content of phenolics, fiber and ashes. Improved the water holding capacity, emulsion stability and cooking yield. Retarded lipid oxidation and microbial deterioration. | [ |
| Low-fat chicken meatballs | PPP | 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2% | Not indicated | Improved the fiber level. Decrease of sensory scores with the increase % of PPP | [ |
| Ground goat meat and cooked nuggets | PPE | 1% | AP and VP for 25 days at 4 °C | Reduction in TBARS content. Extended shelf life | [ |
| Meat paté | PPE | 7.5% ( | Refrigerated at 4 °C for 46 days | Inhibition of | [ |
PP: Pomegranate peel; PPAE: Pomegranate peel aqueous extract; LPP-NPs: Lyophilized pomegranate peel nanoparticles; PPEE: Pomegranate peel ethanol extract; PRPE: Pomegranate rind powder extract; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; Naturmix WM®: Commercial mix of pomegranate and citrus extracts; POM: Pomegranate extract; PPP: pomegranate pomace powder. AP: aerobic packaging; VP: vacuum packaging.