Literature DB >> 32574370

Does masting scale with plant size? High reproductive variability and low synchrony in small and unproductive individuals.

Michał Bogdziewicz1, Jakub Szymkowiak2, Rafael Calama3, Elizabeth E Crone4, Josep M Espelta5, Peter Lesica6, Shealyn Marino7, Michael A Steele7, Brigitte Tenhumberg8, Andrew Tyre9, Magdalena Żywiec10, Dave Kelly11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In a range of plant species, the distribution of individual mean fecundity is skewed and dominated by a few highly fecund individuals. Larger plants produce greater seed crops, but the exact nature of the relationship between size and reproductive patterns is poorly understood. This is especially clear in plants that reproduce by exhibiting synchronized quasi-periodic variation in fruit production, a process called masting.
METHODS: We investigated covariation of plant size and fecundity with individual-plant-level masting patterns and seed predation in 12 mast-seeding species: Pinus pinea, Astragalus scaphoides, Sorbus aucuparia, Quercus ilex, Q. humilis, Q. rubra, Q. alba, Q. montana, Chionochloa pallens, C. macra, Celmisia lyallii and Phormium tenax. KEY
RESULTS: Fecundity was non-linearly related to masting patterns. Small and unproductive plants frequently failed to produce any seeds, which elevated their annual variation and decreased synchrony. Above a low fecundity threshold, plants had similar variability and synchrony, regardless of their size and productivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that within-species variation in masting patterns is correlated with variation in fecundity, which in turn is related to plant size. Low synchrony of low-fertility plants shows that the failure years were idiosyncratic to each small plant, which in turn implies that the small plants fail to reproduce because of plant-specific factors (e.g. internal resource limits). Thus, the behaviour of these sub-producers is apparently the result of trade-offs in resource allocation and environmental limits with which the small plants cannot cope. Plant size and especially fecundity and propensity for mast failure years play a major role in determining the variability and synchrony of reproduction in plants.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecundity; mast seeding; plant reproduction; predator satiation; seed predation; super-producers

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32574370      PMCID: PMC7539353          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  19 in total

1.  Lognormal distribution of individual lifetime fecundity: insights from a 23-year study.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera; Roger Jovani
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Of mast and mean: differential-temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change.

Authors:  Dave Kelly; Andre Geldenhuis; Alex James; E Penelope Holland; Michael J Plank; Robert E Brockie; Philip E Cowan; Grant A Harper; William G Lee; Matt J Maitland; Alan F Mark; James A Mills; Peter R Wilson; Andrea E Byrom
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  Mechanisms of mast seeding: resources, weather, cues, and selection.

Authors:  Ian S Pearse; Walter D Koenig; Dave Kelly
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Correlated seed failure as an environmental veto to synchronize reproduction of masting plants.

Authors:  Michał Bogdziewicz; Michael A Steele; Shealyn Marino; Elizabeth E Crone
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Climate warming disrupts mast seeding and its fitness benefits in European beech.

Authors:  Michał Bogdziewicz; Dave Kelly; Peter A Thomas; Jonathan G A Lageard; Andrew Hacket-Pain
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 15.793

6.  Causes and consequences of unequal seedling production in forest trees: a case study in red oaks.

Authors:  Emily V Moran; James S Clark
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Environmental Veto Synchronizes Mast Seeding in Four Contrasting Tree Species.

Authors:  Michał Bogdziewicz; Magdalena Żywiec; Josep M Espelta; Marcos Fernández-Martinez; Rafael Calama; Mateusz Ledwoń; Eliot McIntire; Elizabeth E Crone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Masting mediated by summer drought reduces acorn predation in Mediterranean oak forests.

Authors:  Josep Maria Espelta; Pilar Cortés; Roberto Molowny-Horas; Belén Sánchez-Humanes; Javier Retana
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Snow tussocks, chaos, and the evolution of mast seeding.

Authors:  Mark Rees; Dave Kelly; Ottar N Bjørnstad
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Prolonged diapause of specialist seed-feeders makes predator satiation unstable in masting of Quercus crispula.

Authors:  Kaoru Maeto; Kennichi Ozaki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effects of ENSO and the North American monsoon on mast seeding in two Rocky Mountain conifer species.

Authors:  Andreas P Wion; Ian S Pearse; Kyle C Rodman; Thomas T Veblen; Miranda D Redmond
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  An assessment of temporal variability in mast seeding of North American Pinaceae.

Authors:  Jalene M LaMontagne; Miranda D Redmond; Andreas P Wion; David F Greene
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The ecology and evolution of synchronized reproduction in long-lived plants.

Authors:  Mario B Pesendorfer; Davide Ascoli; Michał Bogdziewicz; Andrew Hacket-Pain; Ian S Pearse; Giorgio Vacchiano
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Studying the genetic basis of masting.

Authors:  Akiko Satake; Dave Kelly
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Is there tree senescence? The fecundity evidence.

Authors:  Tong Qiu; Marie-Claire Aravena; Robert Andrus; Davide Ascoli; Yves Bergeron; Roberta Berretti; Michal Bogdziewicz; Thomas Boivin; Raul Bonal; Thomas Caignard; Rafael Calama; J Julio Camarero; Connie J Clark; Benoit Courbaud; Sylvain Delzon; Sergio Donoso Calderon; William Farfan-Rios; Catherine A Gehring; Gregory S Gilbert; Cathryn H Greenberg; Qinfeng Guo; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Kazuhiko Hoshizaki; Ines Ibanez; Valentin Journé; Christopher L Kilner; Richard K Kobe; Walter D Koenig; Georges Kunstler; Jalene M LaMontagne; Mateusz Ledwon; James A Lutz; Renzo Motta; Jonathan A Myers; Thomas A Nagel; Chase L Nuñez; Ian S Pearse; Łukasz Piechnik; John R Poulsen; Renata Poulton-Kamakura; Miranda D Redmond; Chantal D Reid; Kyle C Rodman; C Lane Scher; Harald Schmidt Van Marle; Barbara Seget; Shubhi Sharma; Miles Silman; Jennifer J Swenson; Margaret Swift; Maria Uriarte; Giorgio Vacchiano; Thomas T Veblen; Amy V Whipple; Thomas G Whitham; Andreas P Wion; S Joseph Wright; Kai Zhu; Jess K Zimmerman; Magdalena Żywiec; James S Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Measuring temporal patterns in ecology: The case of mast seeding.

Authors:  Marcos Fernández-Martínez; Josep Peñuelas
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Climate change and plant reproduction: trends and drivers of mast seeding change.

Authors:  Andrew Hacket-Pain; Michał Bogdziewicz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.237

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.