Michał Bogdziewicz1, Jakub Szymkowiak2, Rafael Calama3, Elizabeth E Crone4, Josep M Espelta5, Peter Lesica6, Shealyn Marino7, Michael A Steele7, Brigitte Tenhumberg8, Andrew Tyre9, Magdalena Żywiec10, Dave Kelly11. 1. Department of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. 2. Population Ecology Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. 3. Department of Forest Dynamics and Management, INIA-CIFOR, Ctra A CoruñaMadrid, Spain. 4. Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA. 5. CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain. 6. Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA. 7. Department of Biology, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA. 8. School of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA. 9. School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA. 10. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz, Kraków, Poland. 11. Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In a range of plant species, the distribution of individual mean fecundity is skewed and dominated by a few highly fecund individuals. Larger plants produce greater seed crops, but the exact nature of the relationship between size and reproductive patterns is poorly understood. This is especially clear in plants that reproduce by exhibiting synchronized quasi-periodic variation in fruit production, a process called masting. METHODS: We investigated covariation of plant size and fecundity with individual-plant-level masting patterns and seed predation in 12 mast-seeding species: Pinus pinea, Astragalus scaphoides, Sorbus aucuparia, Quercus ilex, Q. humilis, Q. rubra, Q. alba, Q. montana, Chionochloa pallens, C. macra, Celmisia lyallii and Phormium tenax. KEY RESULTS: Fecundity was non-linearly related to masting patterns. Small and unproductive plants frequently failed to produce any seeds, which elevated their annual variation and decreased synchrony. Above a low fecundity threshold, plants had similar variability and synchrony, regardless of their size and productivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that within-species variation in masting patterns is correlated with variation in fecundity, which in turn is related to plant size. Low synchrony of low-fertility plants shows that the failure years were idiosyncratic to each small plant, which in turn implies that the small plants fail to reproduce because of plant-specific factors (e.g. internal resource limits). Thus, the behaviour of these sub-producers is apparently the result of trade-offs in resource allocation and environmental limits with which the small plants cannot cope. Plant size and especially fecundity and propensity for mast failure years play a major role in determining the variability and synchrony of reproduction in plants.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In a range of plant species, the distribution of individual mean fecundity is skewed and dominated by a few highly fecund individuals. Larger plants produce greater seed crops, but the exact nature of the relationship between size and reproductive patterns is poorly understood. This is especially clear in plants that reproduce by exhibiting synchronized quasi-periodic variation in fruit production, a process called masting. METHODS: We investigated covariation of plant size and fecundity with individual-plant-level masting patterns and seed predation in 12 mast-seeding species: Pinus pinea, Astragalus scaphoides, Sorbus aucuparia, Quercus ilex, Q. humilis, Q. rubra, Q. alba, Q. montana, Chionochloa pallens, C. macra, Celmisia lyallii and Phormium tenax. KEY RESULTS: Fecundity was non-linearly related to masting patterns. Small and unproductive plants frequently failed to produce any seeds, which elevated their annual variation and decreased synchrony. Above a low fecundity threshold, plants had similar variability and synchrony, regardless of their size and productivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that within-species variation in masting patterns is correlated with variation in fecundity, which in turn is related to plant size. Low synchrony of low-fertility plants shows that the failure years were idiosyncratic to each small plant, which in turn implies that the small plants fail to reproduce because of plant-specific factors (e.g. internal resource limits). Thus, the behaviour of these sub-producers is apparently the result of trade-offs in resource allocation and environmental limits with which the small plants cannot cope. Plant size and especially fecundity and propensity for mast failure years play a major role in determining the variability and synchrony of reproduction in plants.
Authors: Dave Kelly; Andre Geldenhuis; Alex James; E Penelope Holland; Michael J Plank; Robert E Brockie; Philip E Cowan; Grant A Harper; William G Lee; Matt J Maitland; Alan F Mark; James A Mills; Peter R Wilson; Andrea E Byrom Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Michał Bogdziewicz; Dave Kelly; Peter A Thomas; Jonathan G A Lageard; Andrew Hacket-Pain Journal: Nat Plants Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 15.793
Authors: Michał Bogdziewicz; Magdalena Żywiec; Josep M Espelta; Marcos Fernández-Martinez; Rafael Calama; Mateusz Ledwoń; Eliot McIntire; Elizabeth E Crone Journal: Am Nat Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Andreas P Wion; Ian S Pearse; Kyle C Rodman; Thomas T Veblen; Miranda D Redmond Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Jalene M LaMontagne; Miranda D Redmond; Andreas P Wion; David F Greene Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Mario B Pesendorfer; Davide Ascoli; Michał Bogdziewicz; Andrew Hacket-Pain; Ian S Pearse; Giorgio Vacchiano Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Tong Qiu; Marie-Claire Aravena; Robert Andrus; Davide Ascoli; Yves Bergeron; Roberta Berretti; Michal Bogdziewicz; Thomas Boivin; Raul Bonal; Thomas Caignard; Rafael Calama; J Julio Camarero; Connie J Clark; Benoit Courbaud; Sylvain Delzon; Sergio Donoso Calderon; William Farfan-Rios; Catherine A Gehring; Gregory S Gilbert; Cathryn H Greenberg; Qinfeng Guo; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Kazuhiko Hoshizaki; Ines Ibanez; Valentin Journé; Christopher L Kilner; Richard K Kobe; Walter D Koenig; Georges Kunstler; Jalene M LaMontagne; Mateusz Ledwon; James A Lutz; Renzo Motta; Jonathan A Myers; Thomas A Nagel; Chase L Nuñez; Ian S Pearse; Łukasz Piechnik; John R Poulsen; Renata Poulton-Kamakura; Miranda D Redmond; Chantal D Reid; Kyle C Rodman; C Lane Scher; Harald Schmidt Van Marle; Barbara Seget; Shubhi Sharma; Miles Silman; Jennifer J Swenson; Margaret Swift; Maria Uriarte; Giorgio Vacchiano; Thomas T Veblen; Amy V Whipple; Thomas G Whitham; Andreas P Wion; S Joseph Wright; Kai Zhu; Jess K Zimmerman; Magdalena Żywiec; James S Clark Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 11.205