Ian S Pearse1, Walter D Koenig2,3, Dave Kelly4. 1. The Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S. Oak St, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA. 2. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA. 3. Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. 4. Centre for Integrative Ecology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. dave.kelly@canterbury.ac.nz.
Abstract
546 I. 546 II. 547 III. 548 IV. 552 V. 554 VI. 556 VII. 558 VIII. 558 IX. 559 559 References 559 SUMMARY: Mast seeding is a widespread and widely studied phenomenon. However, the physiological mechanisms that mediate masting events and link them to weather and plant resources are still debated. Here, we explore how masting is affected by plant resource budgets, fruit maturation success, and hormonal coordination of cues including weather and resources. There is little empirical support for the commonly stated hypothesis that plants store carbohydrates over several years to expend in a high-seed year. Plants can switch carbohydrates away from growth in high-seed years, and seed crops are more probably limited by nitrogen or phosphorus. Resources are clearly involved in the proximate mechanisms driving masting, but resource budget (RB) models cannot create masting in the absence of selection because some underlying selective benefit is required to set the level of a 'full' seed crop at greater than the annual resource increment. Economies of scale (EOSs) provide the ultimate factor selecting for masting, but EOSs probably always interact with resources, which modify the relationship between weather cues and reproduction. Thus, RB and EOS models are not alternative explanations for masting - both are required. Experiments manipulating processes that affect mast seeding will help clarify the physiological mechanisms that underlie mast seeding.
546 I. 546 II. 547 III. 548 IV. 552 V. 554 VI. 556 VII. 558 VIII. 558 IX. 559 559 References 559 SUMMARY: Mast seeding is a widespread and widely studied phenomenon. However, the physiological mechanisms that mediate masting events and link them to weather and plant resources are still debated. Here, we explore how masting is affected by plant resource budgets, fruit maturation success, and hormonal coordination of cues including weather and resources. There is little empirical support for the commonly stated hypothesis that plants store carbohydrates over several years to expend in a high-seed year. Plants can switch carbohydrates away from growth in high-seed years, and seed crops are more probably limited by nitrogen or phosphorus. Resources are clearly involved in the proximate mechanisms driving masting, but resource budget (RB) models cannot create masting in the absence of selection because some underlying selective benefit is required to set the level of a 'full' seed crop at greater than the annual resource increment. Economies of scale (EOSs) provide the ultimate factor selecting for masting, but EOSs probably always interact with resources, which modify the relationship between weather cues and reproduction. Thus, RB and EOS models are not alternative explanations for masting - both are required. Experiments manipulating processes that affect mast seeding will help clarify the physiological mechanisms that underlie mast seeding.
Authors: Michael J Sheriff; Alison Bell; Rudy Boonstra; Ben Dantzer; Sophia G Lavergne; Katie E McGhee; Kirsty J MacLeod; Laurane Winandy; Cedric Zimmer; Oliver P Love Journal: Integr Comp Biol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 3.326
Authors: Michał Bogdziewicz; Dave Kelly; Peter A Thomas; Jonathan G A Lageard; Andrew Hacket-Pain Journal: Nat Plants Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 15.793
Authors: Michał Bogdziewicz; Jakub Szymkowiak; Rafael Calama; Elizabeth E Crone; Josep M Espelta; Peter Lesica; Shealyn Marino; Michael A Steele; Brigitte Tenhumberg; Andrew Tyre; Magdalena Żywiec; Dave Kelly Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: M Fernández-Martínez; I Pearse; J Sardans; F Sayol; W D Koenig; J M LaMontagne; M Bogdziewicz; A Collalti; A Hacket-Pain; G Vacchiano; J M Espelta; J Peñuelas; I A Janssens Journal: Nat Plants Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 15.793