Afshan Dean1, Richard M Sharpe. 1. Queen's Medical Research Institute, Medical Research Council/University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Health, 47 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Male reproductive disorders evident at birth or in young adulthood are remarkably common. They are hypothesized to comprise a testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS), with a fetal origin involving mild androgen deficiency. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Testing this hypothesis requires "seeing back in time." Two ways have been proposed: measurement of anogenital distance (AGD), or measurement of the 2:4 digit length ratio. This review assesses the evidence that they reflect fetal androgen exposure and might be used to provide insight into the origin of TDS disorders. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Supporting evidence for AGD derives from rat experimental studies that identified a fetal masculinization programming window, within which androgen action determines adult reproductive organ size, TDS disorders, and AGD. In humans, AGD is positively correlated to testis size, sperm count/fertility, penis length, and T levels, consistent with rat experimental data. The 2:4 digit ratio also shows associations with these parameters, but inconsistently between studies; evidence that the 2:4 digit ratio accurately reflects fetal androgen exposure is also equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: AGD appears to provide a reliable guide to fetal androgen exposure, although available data are limited. The next steps are to: standardize AGD measurement; obtain age-specific population data; and use AGD to evaluate the importance of fetal androgens in determining reproductive disorders and variation in testis/penis size and sperm count in the normal population. These studies should identify what, if any, clinical applications of AGD measurement are feasible--for example, its ability to predict adult-onset reproductive function and disorders.
CONTEXT: Male reproductive disorders evident at birth or in young adulthood are remarkably common. They are hypothesized to comprise a testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS), with a fetal origin involving mild androgen deficiency. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Testing this hypothesis requires "seeing back in time." Two ways have been proposed: measurement of anogenital distance (AGD), or measurement of the 2:4 digit length ratio. This review assesses the evidence that they reflect fetal androgen exposure and might be used to provide insight into the origin of TDS disorders. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Supporting evidence for AGD derives from rat experimental studies that identified a fetal masculinization programming window, within which androgen action determines adult reproductive organ size, TDS disorders, and AGD. In humans, AGD is positively correlated to testis size, sperm count/fertility, penis length, and T levels, consistent with rat experimental data. The 2:4 digit ratio also shows associations with these parameters, but inconsistently between studies; evidence that the 2:4 digit ratio accurately reflects fetal androgen exposure is also equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: AGD appears to provide a reliable guide to fetal androgen exposure, although available data are limited. The next steps are to: standardize AGD measurement; obtain age-specific population data; and use AGD to evaluate the importance of fetal androgens in determining reproductive disorders and variation in testis/penis size and sperm count in the normal population. These studies should identify what, if any, clinical applications of AGD measurement are feasible--for example, its ability to predict adult-onset reproductive function and disorders.
Authors: María Luisa Sánchez-Ferrer; María Teresa Prieto-Sánchez; Carlos Moya-Jiménez; Jaime Mendiola; Carmen María García-Hernández; Ana Carmona-Barnosi; Anibal Nieto; Alberto M Torres-Cantero Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Carolina Felipe Alves de Oliveira; Nathalia de Lima E Martins Lara; Bárbara Ramalho Ladeira Cardoso; Luiz Renato de França; Gleide Fernandes de Avelar Journal: Cell Tissue Res Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Vijayakumar Chinnathambi; Chellakkan S Blesson; Kathleen L Vincent; George R Saade; Gary D Hankins; Chandra Yallampalli; Kunju Sathishkumar Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Emily S Barrett; Lauren E Parlett; Sheela Sathyanarayana; J Bruce Redmon; Ruby H N Nguyen; Shanna H Swan Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 3.980