Literature DB >> 32573775

Alterations in driver genes are predictive of survival in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Caitlin A McIntyre1, Sharon A Lawrence1, Allison L Richards2, Joanne F Chou3, Winston Wong4, Marinela Capanu3, Michael F Berger2,5, Mark T A Donoghue2, Kenneth H Yu4,6, Anna M Varghese4,6, David P Kelsen4,6, Wungki Park4,6, Vinod P Balachandran1,6, T Peter Kingham1, Michael I D'Angelica1, Jeffrey A Drebin1, William R Jarnagin1, Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue5,6,7, Peter J Allen1, Eileen M O'Reilly4,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 are established driver genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study was aimed at determining whether the mutational status of driver genes and those involved in DNA repair pathways are associated with clinical outcomes for individuals who undergo resection.
METHODS: Eligible individuals were those who underwent resection of PDAC and consented to targeted sequencing of their primary tumor via Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT). Genomic alterations were determined on the basis of MSK-IMPACT results from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples. Associations between genomic alterations and clinical outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Targeted sequencing was performed on 283 primary tumors resected between 2004 and 2017. The median follow-up was 23 months among survivors. Alterations in KRAS and TP53 were associated with worse overall survival (OS) in comparison to wild type (median for KRAS, 38.8 months [95% CI, 33.0-45.5 months] vs 91.0 months [95% CI, 34.8 months to not available (NA)]; P = .043; median for TP53, 37.4 months [95% CI, 32.1-42.8 months] vs 65.0 months [95% CI, 33.0 months to NA]; P = .035). KRAS G12D mutations were associated with worse OS (median, 31.6 months [95% CI, 25.3-45.5 months] vs 39.2 months [95% CI, 37.4-75.2 months]; P = .012). TP53 truncating mutations (median, 39.6 months [95% CI, 32.4-75.2 months] vs 33.9 months [95% CI, 24.0-39.0 months]; P = .020) and those associated with loss of heterozygosity (median, 26.6 months [95% CI, 21.6-44.2 months] vs 39.2 months [95% CI, 34.5-49.1 months]; P = .048) had decreased OS. TP53 alterations were independently associated with OS in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01-2.33; P = .042). Individuals with germline alterations in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) genes had improved OS in comparison with those without them (median, not reached vs 37.0 months; 95% CI, 33.0-49.8 months; P = .035).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resected PDAC, genomic alterations in KRAS and TP53 are associated with worse outcomes, whereas alterations in HRD genes are associated with a favorable prognosis. Further studies are needed to better define these alterations as biomarkers in resected PDAC.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  driver gene alterations; homologous recombination; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; resection; survival outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32573775      PMCID: PMC7424538          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  39 in total

1.  Presence of somatic mutations in most early-stage pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Hanno Matthaei; Jian Wu; Seung-Mo Hong; Jun Yu; Michael Borges; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Kenneth Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Ronglai Shen; Venkatraman E Seshan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Integrated Genomic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  p53 mutations in pancreatic carcinoma and evidence of common involvement of homocopolymer tracts in DNA microdeletions.

Authors:  M S Redston; C Caldas; A B Seymour; R H Hruban; L da Costa; C J Yeo; S E Kern
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Frequent somatic mutations and homozygous deletions of the p16 (MTS1) gene in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  C Caldas; S A Hahn; L T da Costa; M S Redston; M Schutte; A B Seymour; C L Weinstein; R H Hruban; C J Yeo; S E Kern
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant c-K-ras genes.

Authors:  C Almoguera; D Shibata; K Forrester; J Martin; N Arnheim; M Perucho
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-05-20       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Phase 1 trial evaluating cisplatin, gemcitabine, and veliparib in 2 patient cohorts: Germline BRCA mutation carriers and wild-type BRCA pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eileen M O'Reilly; Jonathan W Lee; Maeve A Lowery; Marinela Capanu; Zsofia K Stadler; Malcolm J Moore; Neesha Dhani; Hedy L Kindler; Hayley Estrella; Hannah Maynard; Talia Golan; Amiel Segal; Erin E Salo-Mullen; Kenneth H Yu; Andrew S Epstein; Michal Segal; Robin Brenner; Richard K Do; Alice P Chen; Laura H Tang; David P Kelsen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Pathology and molecular genetics of pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Laura D Wood; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

9.  Tumour lineage shapes BRCA-mediated phenotypes.

Authors:  Philip Jonsson; Chaitanya Bandlamudi; Michael L Cheng; Preethi Srinivasan; Shweta S Chavan; Noah D Friedman; Ezra Y Rosen; Allison L Richards; Nancy Bouvier; S Duygu Selcuklu; Craig M Bielski; Wassim Abida; Diana Mandelker; Ozge Birsoy; Liying Zhang; Ahmet Zehir; Mark T A Donoghue; José Baselga; Kenneth Offit; Howard I Scher; Eileen M O'Reilly; Zsofia K Stadler; Nikolaus Schultz; Nicholas D Socci; Agnes Viale; Marc Ladanyi; Mark E Robson; David M Hyman; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Barry S Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Molecular, morphological and survival analysis of 177 resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs): Identification of prognostic subtypes.

Authors:  Anna Melissa Schlitter; Angela Segler; Katja Steiger; Christoph W Michalski; Carsten Jäger; Björn Konukiewitz; Nicole Pfarr; Volker Endris; Markus Bettstetter; Bo Kong; Ivonne Regel; Jörg Kleeff; Günter Klöppel; Irene Esposito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  13 in total

1.  Frailty is associated with poor prognosis after resection for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kosuke Mima; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Shigeki Nakagawa; Takashi Matsumoto; Shotaro Kinoshita; Kazuki Matsumura; Fumimasa Kitamura; Norio Uemura; Yosuke Nakao; Rumi Itoyama; Takayoshi Kaida; Katsunori Imai; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Loss of Rnf43 Accelerates Kras-Mediated Neoplasia and Remodels the Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Abdel Nasser Hosein; Gita Dangol; Takashi Okumura; Jason Roszik; Kimal Rajapakshe; Megan Siemann; Mohamed Zaid; Bidyut Ghosh; Maria Monberg; Paola A Guerrero; Aatur Singhi; Cara L Haymaker; Hans Clevers; Lotfi Abou-Elkacem; Sonja M Woermann; Anirban Maitra
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Pancreatic cancer evolution and heterogeneity: integrating omics and clinical data.

Authors:  Ashton A Connor; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Comprehensive Analysis of Somatic Mutations in Driver Genes of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Reveals KRAS G12D and Mutant TP53 Combination as an Independent Predictor of Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Sami Shoucair; Joseph R Habib; Ning Pu; Benedict Kinny-Köster; A Floortje van Ooston; Ammar A Javed; Kelly J Lafaro; Jin He; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jun Yu
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Molecular Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using a Next-Generation Sequencing Custom-Designed Multigene Panel.

Authors:  Deborah Malvi; Francesco Vasuri; Thais Maloberti; Viviana Sanza; Antonio De Leo; Adele Fornelli; Michele Masetti; Claudia Benini; Raffaele Lombardi; Maria Fortuna Offi; Mariacristina Di Marco; Matteo Ravaioli; Sirio Fiorino; Enrico Franceschi; Alba A Brandes; Elio Jovine; Antonietta D'Errico; Giovanni Tallini; Dario de Biase
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23

Review 6.  Translational advances in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma therapy.

Authors:  Abdel Nasser Hosein; Stephanie K Dougan; Andrew J Aguirre; Anirban Maitra
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2022-03-29

7.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Binbin Zheng-Lin; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 8.  Drivers of Gene Expression Dysregulation in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Swati Venkat; Abdulrahman A Alahmari; Michael E Feigin
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2021-02-19

9.  KRAS gene mutation quantification in the resection or venous margins of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is not predictive of disease recurrence.

Authors:  Samuel Amintas; Benjamin Fernandez; Alexandre Chauvet; Laurence Chiche; Christophe Laurent; Geneviève Belleannée; Marion Marty; Etienne Buscail; Sandrine Dabernat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Isolated Pancreatic Metastases of Renal Cell Cancer: Genetics and Epigenetics of an Unusual Tumour Entity.

Authors:  Franz Sellner; Sabine Thalhammer; Martin Klimpfinger
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.