Literature DB >> 32572625

Comparison of early outcomes between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy among patients with body mass index ≥ 60 kg/m2.

Hassan Nasser1, Tommy Ivanics2, Oliver A Varban3, Jonathan F Finks3, Aaron Bonham3, Amir A Ghaferi3, Arthur M Carlin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the ideal bariatric operation to choose for patients with extremely high body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative complications, weight loss, and comorbidity remission between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) among patients with BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2.
METHODS: Data from a statewide bariatric surgery registry were used to identify all patients with BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2 undergoing LRYGB or LSG between January 2006 and June 2019. Risk and reliability adjustment were used to compare outcomes between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 6015 patients were identified and 2505 (41.6%) underwent LRYGB and 3510 (58.4%) underwent LSG. The overall mean age was 43.1 ± 11.2 years with a mean preoperative BMI of 66.7 ± 6.4 kg/m2. Females accounted for 69.3% and the majority were either white (68.5%) or black (21.2%). LRYGB was associated with a higher rate of adjusted 30-day postoperative serious complications (4.0% vs 2.2%; p < 0.01) including anastomotic leak, obstruction, and bleeding. Resource utilization was also higher with LRYGB (23.7% vs 14.8%; p < 0.01) and included more emergency department visits, readmissions, reoperations, and length of stay ≥ 4 days. The overall 1-year follow-up rate was 38.8%. The adjusted percent total weight loss at 1 year was significantly higher following LRYGB compared to LSG (36.6 ± 9.3 vs 31.3 ± 9.3%; p < 0.01). LRYGB was associated with a higher rate of treatment discontinuation for diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2, LRYGB was associated with better weight loss and medication discontinuation 1 year following surgery at the expense of an increase in perioperative complications and resource utilization compared to LSG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Complications; Gastric bypass; Outcomes; Sleeve gastrectomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32572625     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07750-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

1.  Long-term weight change and health outcomes for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and matched Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) participants in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study.

Authors:  Bestoun Ahmed; Wendy C King; William Gourash; Steven H Belle; Amanda Hinerman; Alfons Pomp; Greg Dakin; Anita P Courcoulas
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Postoperative Early Major and Minor Complications in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) Procedures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emma Osland; Rossita Mohamad Yunus; Shahjahan Khan; Tareq Alodat; Breda Memon; Muhammed Ashraf Memon
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database.

Authors:  Hassan Nasser; Semeret Munie; Tammy L Kindel; Jon C Gould; Rana M Higgins
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Changes in bariatric surgery procedure use in Michigan, 2006-2013.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Jonathan F Finks; Daniel Bacal; Arthur M Carlin; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Outcome after laparoscopic gastric bypass for super-super obese patients.

Authors:  A Schwartz; L Etchechoury; D Collet
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.043

6.  Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients (BMI>50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients.

Authors:  Manish S Parikh; Roy Shen; Matt Weiner; Niccole Siegel; Christine J Ren
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity.

Authors:  Arthur M Carlin; Telal M Zeni; Wayne J English; Abdelkader A Hawasli; Jeffrey A Genaw; Kevin R Krause; Jon L Schram; Kerry L Kole; Jonathan F Finks; John D Birkmeyer; David Share; Nancy J O Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Quality of life and resolution of co-morbidities in super-obese patients remaining morbidly obese after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  John C Bennett; Hongkun Wang; Bruce D Schirmer; C Joe Northup
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  Gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes (Oseberg): a single-centre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Dag Hofsø; Farhat Fatima; Heidi Borgeraas; Kåre Inge Birkeland; Hanne Løvdal Gulseth; Jens Kristoffer Hertel; Line Kristin Johnson; Morten Lindberg; Njord Nordstrand; Milada Cvancarova Småstuen; Darko Stefanovski; Marius Svanevik; Tone Gretland Valderhaug; Rune Sandbu; Jøran Hjelmesæth
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 32.069

10.  Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-Y-Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity-3-Year Outcomes of the Prospective Randomized Swiss Multicenter Bypass Or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS).

Authors:  Ralph Peterli; Bettina Karin Wölnerhanssen; Diana Vetter; Philipp Nett; Markus Gass; Yves Borbély; Thomas Peters; Marc Schiesser; Bernd Schultes; Christoph Beglinger; Juergen Drewe; Marco Bueter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of preoperative weight loss achieved by gastric balloon on peri- and postoperative outcomes of bariatric surgery in super-obese patients: a retrospective matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Ilona Hering; Luise Dörries; Sven Flemming; Laura Krietenstein; Ann-Kathrin Koschker; Martin Fassnacht; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Mohammed K Hankir; Florian Seyfried
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.