Literature DB >> 15978159

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients (BMI>50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients.

Manish S Parikh1, Roy Shen, Matt Weiner, Niccole Siegel, Christine J Ren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery in super-obese patients (BMI >50 kg/m(2)) can be challenging because of difficulties in exposure of visceral fat, retracting the fatty liver, and strong torque applied to instruments, as well as existing co-morbidities.
METHODS: A retrospective review of super-obese patients who underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB n=192), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP n=97), and biliopancreatic diversion with/without duodenal switch (BPD n= 43), was performed. 30 day peri-operative morbidity and mortality were evaluated to determine relative safety of the 3 operations.
RESULTS: From October 2000 through June 2004, 331 super-obese patients underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery, with mean BMI 55.3 kg/m(2). Patients were aged 42 years (13-72), and 75% were female. When categorized by operation (LAGB, RYGBP, BPD), the mean age, BMI and gender were comparable. 6 patients were converted to open (1.8%). LAGB had a 0.5%, RYGBP 2.1% and BPD 7.0% conversion rate (P=0.02, all groups). Median operative time was 60 min for LAGB, 130 min for RYGBP and 255 min for BPD (P<0.001, all groups). Median length of stay was 24 hours for LAGB, 72 hours for RYGBP, and 96 hours for BPD (P <0.001). Mean %EWL for the LAGB was 35.3+/-12.6, 45.8+/-19.4, and 49.5+/-18.6 with follow-up of 87%, 76% and 72% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Mean %EWL for the RYGBP was 57.7+/-15.4, 54.7+/-21.2, and 56.8+/-21.1 with follow-up of 76%, 33% and 54% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Mean %EWL for the BPD was 60.6+/-15.9, 69.4+/-13.0 and 77.4+/-11.9 with follow-up of 79%, 43% and 47% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. The difference in %EWL was significant at all time intervals between the LAGB and BPD (P<0.004). However, there was no significant difference in %EWL between LAGB and RYGBP at 2 and 3 years. Overall perioperative morbidity occurred in 27 patients (8.1%). LAGB had 4.7% morbidity rate, RYGBP 11.3%, and BPD 16.3% (P=0.02, all groups). There were no deaths.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is safe in super-obese patients. LAGB, the least invasive procedure, resulted in the lowest operative times, the lowest conversion rate, the shortest hospital stay and the lowest morbidity in this high-risk cohort of patients. Rates of all parameters studied increased with increasing procedural complexity. However, the difference in %EWL between RYGBP and LAGB at 2 and 3 years was not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15978159     DOI: 10.1381/0960892054222632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  40 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for morbid obesity.

Authors:  John M H Bennett; Samir Mehta; Michael Rhodes
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Gut hormones as potential new targets for appetite regulation and the treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Benjamin C T Field; Alison M Wren; Dunstan Cooke; Stephen R Bloom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Gastric banding - to band or bypass. Adjustable gastric banding: blessing or curse?

Authors:  Jacques M Himpens
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: a comparative study.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Gilles Chassot; Francesco Volonte; Pascale Koutny-Fong; Monika E Hagen; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Safety of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: an evidence update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-11-01

Review 6.  Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2).

Authors:  Kim Peterson; Johanna Anderson; Erin Boundy; Lauren Ferguson; Katherine Erickson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  European Obesity Summit (EOS) - Joint Congress of EASOand IFSO-EC, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 1 - 4, 2016: Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.942

8.  A Matched Cohort Analysis of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus Saving (SIPS) Surgery Versus Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch with Two-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Austin Cottam; Daniel Cottam; Dana Portenier; Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Samuel Cottam; Legrand Belnap; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  The "Birmingham stitch"--avoiding slippage in laparoscopic gastric banding.

Authors:  Rishi Singhal; Mark Kitchen; Sandra Ndirika; Kathryn Hunt; Sue Bridgwater; Paul Super
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Comparison of those who succeed in losing significant excessive weight after bariatric surgery and those who fail.

Authors:  Brad Snyder; Alex Nguyen; Terry Scarbourough; Sherman Yu; Erik Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.