Literature DB >> 32569383

The quick and the dead: a new model for the essential role of ABA accumulation in synthetic auxin herbicide mode of action.

Todd A Gaines1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abscisic acid; auxin; ethylene; herbicides; photosynthesis; plant hormones

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32569383      PMCID: PMC7307849          DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


× No keyword cloud information.
The synthetic auxin herbicides mimic endogenous auxin and have been used for weed control in crop, turf, and non-crop systems for decades ( New synthetic auxins continue to be discovered and commercialized, such as halauxifen-methyl (Schmitzer ). The recent introduction of transgenic soybean and cotton with resistance to dicamba (Behrens ) and 2,4-D (Wright ) has focused increased attention on this mode of action, both for novel in-crop weed management as well as for the increased selection pressure for resistance in weeds and off-target movement issues (Mortensen ). Synthetic auxin herbicides interact with the auxin receptor complex and bind to Aux/IAA proteins that are transcriptional repressors of auxin-responsive genes such as GH3 and 1-AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLATE SYNTHASE (ACS) (Grossmann, 2010; Jugulam ). Degradation of the Aux/IAA transcriptional repressors occurs following binding to the auxin receptor complex, resulting in rapid transcription of auxin-responsive genes (Box 1; Liscum and Reed, 2002). Prior to synthetic auxin herbicide application, (1) Aux/IAA proteins repress transcription of many auxin-responsive genes, including NCED. (2) Application of synthetic auxin herbicide. (3) A massive dose of synthetic auxin herbicide deregulates auxin-responsive gene expression through binding to the TIR1/AFB auxin receptor, resulting in Aux/IAA ubiquitination and destruction; the auxin-responsive genes are rapidly transcribed. McCauley propose that NCED is the principal auxin-responsive gene driving plant death, and its up-regulation is the critical step for the synthetic auxin herbicide mode of action. (4) NCED is the rate-limiting step for ABA production, and up-regulation results in rapid accumulation of ABA. (5) Transcript abundance of photosynthesis-related genes showed a general down-regulation, proposed to be an effect of ABA accumulation. (6) Plants die from loss of photosynthesis and deregulation of plant growth and development. Figure created with BioRender. Plants have multiple Aux/IAA genes and multiple auxin-responsive genes including the rate-limiting steps for synthesis of the plant hormones ethylene (ACS) and ABA (NCED). A prevailing view has been that ethylene generation following synthetic auxin application is one of the main processes leading to plant death (Grossmann, 2010), via ACS up-regulation caused by synthetic auxin-mediated removal of Aux/IAA transcriptional repressor(s). Ethylene was rapidly induced following synthetic auxin herbicide application in Galium aparine (Hansen and Grossmann, 2000), while an ethylene perception-defective mutant in tomato did not have ABA accumulation or growth inhibition following synthetic auxin herbicide application, suggesting that ABA accumulation depended on synthesis and perception of ethylene (Hansen and Grossmann, 2000). Ethylene accumulation and increased ACS expression were found after dicamba treatment in sensitive Kochia scoparia, but neither ethylene nor ACS expression occurred after dicamba treatment of resistant kochia with a mutation in the Aux/IAA co-receptor gene IAA16 (Howatt ; LeClere ; Pettinga ).

How does a plant really die from synthetic auxin herbicides?

Enhanced NCED expression was detected at 1 h and 6 h after treatment with three different synthetic auxin herbicides, followed by rapid synthesis of ABA within 6 h of treatment (Box 1; McCauley ). Increased ABA synthesis was independent of loss of cell turgor due to decreased leaf water potential/stomatal closure, or increases in ethylene, both of which are potential triggers of ABA synthesis. ABA continued to increase in the days following synthetic auxin herbicide application, even more so than in plants at the point of death from drought. No difference in ACS expression was found at 1 h after treatment, with a slight increase in ACS6 at 6 h after treatment. Ethylene increased only at 24 h after treatment with 2,4-D and dicamba, but not after halauxifen-methyl. Together, the consistency and immediacy of NCED up-regulation with subsequent ABA accumulation for all three synthetic auxin herbicides supports a primary role for the NCED/ABA pathway in the mode of action for plant death. Halauxifen-methyl may have some unique signalling pathways relative to 2,4-D and dicamba, which both induced ethylene at 24 h while halauxifen-methyl did not. In addition to the up-regulation of NCED, at 6 h after synthetic auxin herbicide treatment, a network of genes with Gene Ontology terms related to photosynthesis was down-regulated by all three herbicides, including 52 key genes related to the Calvin cycle, light-harvesting complexes, the chloroplast electron transport chain, and chlorophyll biosynthesis (McCauley ). These trends suggest that synthetic auxin herbicides are not targeting a specific component of photosynthesis such as PSI or PSII inhibitors, but instead are causing a wholesale transcriptional down-regulation of multiple components of photosynthesis (Box 1).

A new model for synthetic auxin herbicide mode of action reveals new research questions

Based on the findings of McCauley , synthetic auxin herbicides trigger plant death by rapidly increasing ABA through NCED expression, resulting in a widespread down-regulation of transcription of photosynthesis-related genes within 6 h after treatment (Box 1). Ethylene was induced by application of some, but not all, synthetic auxin herbicides, putting its role as an essential component of the mode of action into doubt. The next step in this research is to test the hypothesis that NCED function is necessary for the mode of action of synthetic auxin herbicides by asking whether an NCED knockout in Arabidopsis is resistant to synthetic auxin herbicides. This evidence is needed to disprove the previously reported critical role of ethylene synthesis and perception in synthetic auxin herbicide mode of action (Hansen and Grossmann, 2000; Grossmann, 2010). If the function of NCED up-regulation leading to ABA accumulation is necessary for synthetic auxin herbicide mode of action and plant death, loss of NCED should make a plant insensitive to synthetic auxin herbicides. For the effect on photosynthesis, if an NCED gene knockout in Arabidopsis shows no down-regulation of photosynthesis genes following synthetic auxin herbicide application, then the down-regulation of photosynthesis is caused by ABA-mediated signalling. If photosynthesis is still down-regulated, then another critical signalling pathway is acting and needs to be determined. Additional next steps would be to identify the networks of Aux/IAA proteins that repress NCED transcription (Box 1). This could be achieved by ChIP sequencing (ChIP-Seq) using purified protein of every Aux/IAA gene, enabling prediction of the Aux/IAA proteins that are the most likely candidates for evolved target site mutations in weeds. Weed species from different plant families could be compared for the roles of the various Aux/IAA proteins in synthetic auxin herbicide responses. For example, in Erigeron canadensis (Asteraceae), do similar Aux/IAA proteins regulate NCED as in Brassicaceae, Caryophyllales, and/or Solanaceae? Based on the known function of the IAA16 Gly127Asn mutation in K. scoparia, which changes the degron from GWPPV to NWPPV and confers resistance to dicamba (LeClere ), a testable prediction is that IAA16 is one repressor of NCED. The degron of IAA16 has also been found to cause insensitivity to both auxin and ABA when mutated from GWPPV to GWLPV (Rinaldi ). As Aux/IAA repressors of NCED are identified, further research can determine which are expressed during normal plant growth and development, and which are induced by high doses of both endogenous auxins and synthetic auxin herbicides. Are different Aux/IAA proteins degraded in response to different synthetic auxin herbicide chemical families, and, consequently, should we expect to find Aux/IAA mutations conferring resistance to 2,4-D in the same or different Aux/IAA genes from those for dicamba or halauxifen-methyl? Further, investigations of synthetic auxin-resistant weeds should measure NCED expression before and after herbicide treatment as a key marker of the mode of action. Lack of NCED up-regulation in resistant plants may indicate the presence of target site resistance mechanisms, such as Aux/IAA mutations. NCED expression after herbicide treatment should also be measured for metabolic synthetic auxin resistance mechanisms (e.g. Figueiredo ). To enable this comprehensive understanding of synthetic auxin herbicide mode of action and allow prediction of herbicide resistance evolution across weed species, more weed genomics resources are urgently needed (Ravet ). McCauley were able to conduct their transcriptomics research in E. canadensis due to the availability of a reference genome (Peng ), which they annotated themselves. In addition, transcriptomics provides hypotheses, but the development of functional tools to test these hypotheses are urgently needed to enable the study of gene function in weeds (Halfhill ; Patterson ).
  15 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development.

Authors:  E Liscum; J W Reed
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes.

Authors:  Terry R Wright; Guomin Shan; Terence A Walsh; Justin M Lira; Cory Cui; Ping Song; Meibao Zhuang; Nicole L Arnold; Gaofeng Lin; Kerrm Yau; Sean M Russell; Robert M Cicchillo; Mark A Peterson; David M Simpson; Ning Zhou; Jayakumar Ponsamuel; Zhanyuan Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The power and potential of genomics in weed biology and management.

Authors:  Karl Ravet; Eric L Patterson; Hansjörg Krähmer; Kateřina Hamouzová; Longjiang Fan; Marie Jasieniuk; Amy Lawton-Rauh; Jenna M Malone; J Scott McElroy; Aldo Merotto; Philip Westra; Christopher Preston; Martin M Vila-Aiub; Roberto Busi; Patrick J Tranel; Carl Reinhardt; Christopher Saski; Roland Beffa; Paul Neve; Todd A Gaines
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.845

4.  Cross-resistance to dicamba, 2,4-D, and fluroxypyr in Kochia scoparia is endowed by a mutation in an AUX/IAA gene.

Authors:  Sherry LeClere; Chenxi Wu; Philip Westra; R Douglas Sammons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transformation and segregation of GFP fluorescence and glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis) hybrids.

Authors:  Matthew D Halfhill; Laura L Good; Chhandak Basu; Jason Burris; Christopher L Main; Thomas C Mueller; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 6.  Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action.

Authors:  Klaus Grossmann
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.845

7.  De novo genome assembly of the economically important weed horseweed using integrated data from multiple sequencing platforms.

Authors:  Yanhui Peng; Zhao Lai; Thomas Lane; Madhugiri Nageswara-Rao; Miki Okada; Marie Jasieniuk; Henriette O'Geen; Ryan W Kim; R Douglas Sammons; Loren H Rieseberg; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Dicamba resistance: enlarging and preserving biotechnology-based weed management strategies.

Authors:  Mark R Behrens; Nedim Mutlu; Sarbani Chakraborty; Razvan Dumitru; Wen Zhi Jiang; Bradley J Lavallee; Patricia L Herman; Thomas E Clemente; Donald P Weeks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Weed resistance to synthetic auxin herbicides.

Authors:  Roberto Busi; Danica E Goggin; Ian M Heap; Michael J Horak; Mithila Jugulam; Robert A Masters; Richard M Napier; Dilpreet S Riar; Norbert M Satchivi; Joel Torra; Phillip Westra; Terry R Wright
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 10.  Omics Potential in Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management.

Authors:  Eric L Patterson; Christopher Saski; Anita Küpper; Roland Beffa; Todd A Gaines
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Transcriptome analysis of the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)-tolerant cotton chromosome substitution line CS-B15sh and its susceptible parental lines G. hirsutum L. cv. Texas Marker-1 and G. barbadense L. cv. Pima 379.

Authors:  Loida M Perez; Ramil Mauleon; Mark A Arick; Zenaida V Magbanua; Daniel G Peterson; Jeffrey F D Dean; Te Ming Tseng
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.627

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.