Literature DB >> 32568494

COVID-19's Impact on Italian Urology.

Francesco Esperto1, Rocco Papalia1, Ana María Autrán-Gómez2, Roberto M Scarpa1.   

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our lives, our habits and our healthcare system. Italy is one of the countries affected first and more aggressively from the outbreak. Our rapidity has been guide for other healthcare systems from around the World. We describe the impact of COVID-19 on Urology, how the Urological scientific community responded to the emergency and our experience in a high-volume Roman University hospital. The aim of our work is to share our experience providing suggestions for other global hospitals on how to manage the COVID-19 emergency. Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 [Supplementary Concept]; Pandemics; Urology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32568494      PMCID: PMC7719978          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


EPIDEMIOLOGY

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 ( 1 ). The disease has been termed COVID-19 and on March 11th 2020, The World Health Organization (WHO) declared it as a pandemic ( 2 ). On April 21st, 2,585,468 COVID-19 positive cases and 178,854 deaths have been confirmed worldwide. The United States, Spain and Italy were the most affected countries with 825,306, 208,389 and 183,957 positive cases respectively ( 3 ).

ITALY

COVID-19 was first detected in Italy on January 30th, and the Italian government immediately declared the state of emergency. A COVID-19 task Force and a Special Commissioner for the Emergency were appointed. On February 23th, a ban was put on entry and exit in the municipalities where outbreaks occurred, and public events were suspended. National lock down was officially announced on March 9th ( 4 ). The number of cases increased since the first case and peaked in mid-March ( Figure-1 ) ( 5 ).
Figure 1

The outbreak evolution curve of confirmed COVID-19 new cases in Italy from Feb 2 to April 12 ( 5 ).

On April 29th the number of COVID-19 associated deaths was 26,977. A total of 17,997 healthcare workers were tested positive for COVID-19 (median age 48 years, 32% male), which accounted for 10.7% of the total number of reported cases. The high transmission potential of the virus in the healthcare sector was evident ( Figure-2 ) ( 6 ). Overall, 79,370 cases were male (50.0%) and the median age amongst both genders was 62 years (range 0-100). In the age groups 0-9, 10-19, 60-69 and 70-79 years, a greater number of male cases compared with female were observed. There was an increase in lethality with increasing age of cases. Lethality was higher in male subjects in all age groups, except for the age group >90 years. In 31.1% of the reported cases, at least one co-morbidity was identified (cardiovascular, respiratory, diabetes, immune deficiencies, metabolic, oncological, obesity, kidney and other chronic pathologies) ( 6 ). Presenting symptoms of COVID-19 patients included fever (75%), dyspnea (72%), cough (38%), diarrhea (6%), hemoptysis (1%). Overall, 60.7% of COVID-19 deaths were associated with 3 or more pre-existing diseases ( 4 ). The distribution of COVID-19 cases varies within the country. The north is much more affected and is reflected on the mortality rate ( Figure-3 ) ( 3 ).
Figure 2

Integrated surveillance of COVID-19 in Italy ( 6 ).

Figure 3

Distribution of COVID-19 cases in Italy ( 3 ).

At the 28th of April the most affected regions were Lombardy, Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Veneto, Tuscany and Liguria with an amount of total cases detected of 74348, 25450, 24914, 17708, 9231, 7772 respectively. The mortality rate was the following: 18.3 % in Lombardy, 11.5 % in Piedmont, 13.9 % in Emilia Romagna, 7.95 % in Veneto, 8.8 % in Tuscany, 14.7 % in Liguria. The less affected regions were Calabria, Basilicata and Molise with a mortality rate of 7.7 %, 6.8 %, 7.1 % respectively. Lazio with 6467 cases detected had a mortality rate of 6.4 %. Intensive care units (ICUs) filled up quickly with COVID-19 patients and became stretched to accommodate non-COVID-19 patients who required critical care. In Lombardy Grasselli et al. described a mortality rate of 26% in ICUs as of March 25, 2020 ( 7 ). The initial lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and swab testing led to a rapid spread. Healthcare professionals were being infected, reducing the number of healthcare workers (HWs) available to manage the emergency. However, the situation was different in less affected regions where there was more time to prepare and organize resources and HWs to manage the pandemic.

MEASURES

Members of the RUN (Research Urology Network) group provided guidance on the management of urological patients during the COVID-19 era. They suggested treatment for urgent or emergent urological conditions only. Factors affecting the categorization of procedures included the need for postoperative intensive care, need for blood transfusion or other blood products, cardiovascular, respiratory or infective comorbidities, and the need for psychophysical support. Indications in postponing up to six months prostate biopsies, flexible cystoscopies, replacements of ureteral stents and nephrostomy tubes, intravesical therapy for low and intermediate risk bladder cancers have been provided ( Table-1 ) ( 8 ).
Table 1

Factors potentially affecting the choice of the different urological procedures during COVID- 19 pandemic (8).

ProcedureIndication for the emergency phaseNote
Prostate biopsyPostponeReconsider performing prostate biopsy in patients with high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer if the emergency phase should prolong
Flexible cystoscopyPostponeReconsider performing cystoscopy in patients with high risk bladder cancer if the emergency phase should prolong
Replacement of ureteral stents and nephrostomy tubePostpone up to 6 months
Intravesical therapy for high risk bladder cancerDo not postpone
Intravesical therapy for low or intermediate risk bladder cancerPostpone
The admission pathway included pre--admission telephone triage, nasopharyngeal swabs, PPE, strict rules in the operating room ( 9 ). Ribal et al. produced dedicated European Associations of Urology (EAU) guidelines on the management of Urological patients during the COVID-19 outbreak ( 10 ). Despite strong efforts in trying to prioritize oncological and urgent procedures, the burden of oncological patients on waiting list is increasing. Campi et al. described the progressive reduction in all elective's procedures in three high volume Urology centers in Italy ( 11 ).

Impact on training

Resident's programs in Europe and in Italy are just harassed from a lack of adequate academic and surgical training ( 12 – 15 ) and it is known how its associated frustration may lead to burnout ( 16 ). Several papers described a global slowdown of Urology residence program during the pandemic ( 17 – 19 ). Social Media and smart learning implementation have been proposed as valid tools to supply scientific knowledge during this scenario ( 20 , 21 ). Our group asked ‘what should be the role of residents during a pandemic?'. On calling the Hippocrates statement (Afhprism 1,1) “Ὁ βίος βραχύς, ἡ δὲ τέχνη μακρή, ὁ δὲ καιρὸς ὀξύς, ἡ δὲ πεῖρα σφαλερή, ἡ δὲ κρίσις χαλεπή” “Vita brevis, ars longa, occasion praeceps, experimentum periculosum, iudicium difficile”, we think residents should play an active role alongside the specialist by exploiting the pandemic as an unrepeatable opportunity from which to learn upon ( 22 ). In general, the COVID-19 emergency is a highly dynamic situation and the burden on the healthcare system varies daily according to the geographical region.

Our Experience

Campus Bio-Medico University is a high--volume university Hospital in Rome. It has no Accident and Emergency (A and E) Department and currently is COVID-19 free. We continue to operate on oncological and urgent patients with safety precautions. Information about the virus, local policies, patients' access to the hospital, surgery protocols and individual protection have been provided to all HWs ( Table-2 ). Every 8 hours a FFP2 mask is made available at the main entrance of the hospital. An open Outpatient COVID-19 Clinic (composed of 2 senior and 3 junior Internal Medicine Consultants) for HWs has been established to review those with symptoms or have been in close contact with a positive or suspect COVID-19 patient.
Table 2

Summary of the COVID-19 task force actions regarding PPE of Health workers (HWs).

Front office staff workingHealthcare personnel in contact with patientsLaboratory staff in contact with biological samples
At station in direct contact with patientsAt station with protective glassIn contact with a suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19In contact with a patient who presents symptoms of fever and / or cold and / or coughPerforming endoscopic proceduresAssigned to take a biological sample for COVID-19 + patientAnesthesiologists performing intubation
frequent hand hygiene by using 60% alcohol solutionfrequent hand hygiene by using 60% alcohol solutionFFP2 filtering mask (use FFP3 only for the procedures that generate aerosols)FFP2 filtering mask (use FFP3 only for the procedures that generate aerosols)FFP3 filtering masksFFP3 filtering maskFFP3 filtering maskFFP3 filtering mask
wear the FFP2 filtering mask during the entire work shift/goggles or visors to protect eyes from biological liquids ‘splashesgoggles or visors to protect eyes from biological liquids ‘splashesgoggles or visors to protect eyes from biological liquids ‘splashesgoggles or visors to protect eyes from biological liquids ‘splashesgoggles or visors to protect eyes from biological liquids ‘splashesgoggles or visors to protect eyes from biological liquids ‘splashes
wear protective glasses from liquids splashes during the entire work shift/water repellent PPE coat/water repellent PPE coatwater repellent PPE coatwater repellent PPE coatwater repellent PPE coat
provide a surgical mask, supplied at the desk, to be worn by the patient with visible respiratory symptomsprovide a surgical mask, supplied at the desk, to be worn by the patient with visible respiratory symptomsdouble glovesglovesglovesdouble glovesdouble glovesdouble gloves
Access to the Hospital is regulated through telephone triage to rule out any symptoms or suspicion of COVID-19. In suspected cases, responsible physicians would call to clarify. In non-suspected cases, patients could go for hospital admission as pre-planned. In suspected cases, patients are instructed to stay at home and call their GP for further advice. The access to the hospital is allowed from a unique entrance with security check. A surgical facemask and hand hygiene with 60% alcoholic solution are provided to everyone at the entrance. Temperature is checked through a thermoscanner, symptoms are checked and reason for admission is evaluated. If no issues are encountered during this phase, patient can access the hospital. If any doubts are raised during the admission check, the responsible physician would review the case and decide whether to proceed with pre-planned admission or to refer to a dedicated COVID team. We have detected three positive patients (in droplet isolation inside the hospital from the beginning of their admission) who have been transferred to COVID-19 centers within 48 hours. All the healthcare staff who had been in contact with them have been swabbed twice with negative results, showing the efficacy of the policy undertaken. Visitors are allowed to access the hospital for a limited span of time (1 hour) and only one person per patient are allowed to visit after strict security checks performed at the main entrance. We developed telemedicine protocols for outpatient's clinic and arranged virtual multidisciplinary meetings for oncological patients. Our surgical activity increased in volume, performing exclusively elective oncological and urgent operations. All patients treated have been called two weeks after discharge and none have declared any symptoms of COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 emergency is a highly dynamic situation and the burden on the healthcare system varies daily according to the geographical region. Through meticulous hospital instructions, prompt adoption of PPE, controlled access to the hospital, and prompt management of suspected/positive cases, we were able to maintain a COVID-19 free hospital and to continue our surgical activities during the pandemic.
  13 in total

1.  Resident burnout in USA and European urology residents: an international concern.

Authors:  Daniel Marchalik; Charlotte C Goldman; Filipe F L Carvalho; Michele Talso; John H Lynch; Francesco Esperto; Benjamin Pradere; Jeroen Van Besien; Ross E Krasnow
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Scientific social media, a new way to expand knowledge. What do urologists need to know?

Authors:  J Gómez Rivas; D M Carrion; L Tortolero; D Veneziano; F Esperto; F Greco; G Cacciamani; A Dourado Meneses; Z Okhunov; M Rodriguez Socarrás
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)       Date:  2019-04-20

3.  What is the role of residents during a pandemic?

Authors:  Francesco Esperto; Rocco Papalia; Karl H Pang; Rita Cataldo; Roberto M Scarpa
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.720

4.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology residency training in Italy.

Authors:  Daniele Amparore; Francesco Claps; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Francesco Esperto; Cristian Fiori; Giovanni Liguori; Sergio Serni; Carlo Trombetta; Marco Carini; Francesco Porpiglia; Enrico Checcucci; Riccardo Campi
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.720

5.  Interest and involvement of European urology residents in academic and research activities. An ESRU-ESU-ESUT collaborative study.

Authors:  Diego M Carrion; Moises E Rodríguez-Socarrás; Guglielmo Mantica; Karl H Pang; Francesco Esperto; Angelika Mattigk; Diederick Duijvesz; Juan L Vásquez; Jesús Díez Sebastián; Roberto M Scarpa; Rocco Papalia; Joan Palou; Juan Gómez Rivas
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.720

6.  Current status of urological training in Europe.

Authors:  Diego M Carrion; Juan Gómez Rivas; Francesco Esperto; Giulio Patruno; Juan L Vasquez
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.436

7.  Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Alberto Zangrillo; Alberto Zanella; Massimo Antonelli; Luca Cabrini; Antonio Castelli; Danilo Cereda; Antonio Coluccello; Giuseppe Foti; Roberto Fumagalli; Giorgio Iotti; Nicola Latronico; Luca Lorini; Stefano Merler; Giuseppe Natalini; Alessandra Piatti; Marco Vito Ranieri; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Enrico Storti; Maurizio Cecconi; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Clinical pathways for urology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Alchiede Simonato; Gianluca Giannarini; Alberto Abrate; Riccardo Bartoletti; Alessandro Crestani; Cosimo De Nunzio; Andrea Gregori; Giovanni Liguori; Giacomo Novara; Nicola Pavan; Carlo Trombetta; Andrea Tubaro; Francesco Porpiglia; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.720

9.  Slowdown of urology residents' learning curve during the COVID-19 emergency.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Enrico Checcucci; Daniele Amparore; Paolo Verri; Riccardo Campi; Francesco Claps; Franceso Esperto; Cristian Fiori; Giuseppe Carrieri; Vincenzo Ficarra; Roberto Mario Scarpa; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Assessing the Burden of Nondeferrable Major Uro-oncologic Surgery to Guide Prioritisation Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Three Italian High-volume Referral Centres.

Authors:  Riccardo Campi; Daniele Amparore; Umberto Capitanio; Enrico Checcucci; Andrea Salonia; Cristian Fiori; Andrea Minervini; Alberto Briganti; Marco Carini; Francesco Montorsi; Sergio Serni; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  3 in total

1.  SARS-COVID-19 transformed the world and urological practice.

Authors:  Luciano A Favorito
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.541

2.  Exploring Urological Experience in the COVID-19 Outbreak: American Confederation of Urology (CAU) Survey.

Authors:  Ana María Autrán-Gómez; Ignacio Tobia; Ricardo Castillejos Molina; Francisco Rodríguez Covarrubias; Frank Benzing; Serena Maruccia; Leonardo de O Reis; Ramón Rodríguez Lay; Marcelo Torrico De la Reza; Felix Santaella Torres; Andrés Hernández Porras; Alejandro Rodríguez
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 3.  Implementation and strategies to ensure adequate coordination within a Urology Department during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Francesco Esperto; Francesco Prata; Angelo Civitella; Karl H Pang; Michele Marchioni; Piergiorgio Tuzzolo; Roberto M Scarpa; Rocco Papalia
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.541

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.