Literature DB >> 32274879

Slowdown of urology residents' learning curve during the COVID-19 emergency.

Francesco Porpiglia1, Enrico Checcucci1,2,3, Daniele Amparore1, Paolo Verri1, Riccardo Campi3,4,5, Francesco Claps6, Franceso Esperto3,7, Cristian Fiori1, Giuseppe Carrieri8, Vincenzo Ficarra9, Roberto Mario Scarpa7, Prokar Dasgupta10.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32274879      PMCID: PMC7262049          DOI: 10.1111/bju.15076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


× No keyword cloud information.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has rapidly been spreading worldwide, and Italy has been hit hard, forcing the Italian Healthcare System to change and adapt to these extreme conditions. The daily activities of the Urology Department have been drastically reduced and limited only to non‐deferrable procedures, and the entire organogram re‐organised following a rigorous flowchart [1]. It is evident that this unprecedent scenario will have an impact on resident training programmes, as it is very difficult to predict the duration of the COVID‐19 emergency. Urology residents do not have the opportunity to carry out clinical activities or to be tutored, as senior physicians are engaged in the emergency’s management. In particular, the Authorities have limited unnecessary access to urology departments for residents in order to contain the infection. Moreover, the procedures most affected by these restrictions are those in which the residents are mostly involved (benign pathologies, lower urinary tract surgery, and andrology); the surgical interventions, when performed, are carried out by expert surgeons, with the aim to standardise the procedures, reduce the operative time and the risk of complications. Very conflicting positions have emerged recently in Italy about the safety of laparoscopic and robot‐assisted surgical procedures during the COVID‐19 pandemic. This is mainly related to the recently published claims on the potential risk of dissemination of the coronavirus infection through surgical gas [2]. Lastly, case discussions and departmental meetings have been cancelled, to avoid gathering. Attempts to systematically analyse and categorise the most affected activities during the 5‐year training programme (e.g. surgical training, research) are impossible, due to the absence of a homogeneous national training programme. Therefore, it is clear that urology resident training is affected transversally throughout the 5‐year residency, due to the involvement of ambulatory, outpatient surgery and major surgery (either open, minimally invasive surgery or endoscopic). A recently published survey gives a snapshot of residency training in Italy in 2018 [3], showing a high level of satisfaction amongst the residents, notwithstanding limitations concerning scientific activity and surgical training. In order to limit the impact of the COVID‐19 emergency on the residents’ learning curves, which can further affect surgical and scientific learning, new alternative teaching methods should be introduced (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of the different smart‐learning technologies and their respective fields of application.

Smart‐learning technologySmart‐learning applications
Pre‐recorded videos on‐demand

Taught class

Video library

Fundamentals of surgery

Surgical procedure’s commentary

Expert’s ‘tips and tricks’

Webinar

Interactive lessons

Discussion of clinical cases

Non‐technical skills

Live debates

Journal Club via social media

Differed debates

Critical analysis of the literature

Resident’s editorials

Shared working experiences

Podcast

Lectures

Case reports

Clinical staff and rounds

Daily updates (single or multiple)

‘Virtual’ rounds

Collegial discussions of surgical approach

Administration’s directives

Simulation

Home simulators (experimental)

Summary of the different smart‐learning technologies and their respective fields of application. Taught class Video library Fundamentals of surgery Surgical procedure’s commentary Expert’s ‘tips and tricks’ Interactive lessons Discussion of clinical cases Non‐technical skills Live debates Differed debates Critical analysis of the literature Resident’s editorials Shared working experiences Lectures Case reports Daily updates (single or multiple) ‘Virtual’ rounds Collegial discussions of surgical approach Administration’s directives Home simulators (experimental) So, thanks to new web‐based technologies, teaching activity can continue. Among the different technologies available, different types of smart‐learning can be implemented. The first one is represented by an online dedicated platform, where pre‐recorded videos of lessons or surgical procedures are uploaded; these files could be available on‐demand for the residents. In this setting, users greatly appreciate the ability to watch pre‐recorded surgical procedures commented upon by an expert, with focus on routinely performed urological manoeuvres or new techniques and technologies in urology or, furthermore, expert ‘tips and tricks’ for challenging cases. The Surgery in Motion School of the European Urology Association (https://surgeryinmotion-school.org) represents a well‐established video‐based educational tool for efficient mentorship in surgical training. The next facet of online teaching is represented by the webinar format. It has already been shown to be useful in this setting [4], giving to both professors and students the chance to interact and to enjoy multimedia content in real‐time. Classes, clinical cases discussion and interactive pre‐recorded video presentations can be held by an expert, and the residents have the ability to ask questions. Moreover, various non‐technical skills can be covered. Furthermore, exploiting web microblogging services, like Twitter online Journal Clubs can be done. By using social media, residents can engage in critical appraisal of evidence‐based medicine with dynamic worldwide shared discussion amongst themselves, having the chance to interact with opinion leaders in specific topics. This format has already proven to change clinical practice in 50% of young attendees [5]. Lastly, pre‐recorded audio files of expert opinion can be shared online, creating dedicated Podcast channels. This modality of e‐learning is not novel and every week >500 000 podcasts are active worldwide. Today, for urology there are a total of two podcasts experiences and only one of which was active (i.e. https://www.bjuinternational.com/podcasts). From this examination, it appears clear how the theoretical training of residents can continue with smart‐learning modalities. However, in reality the implementation of such clinical smart‐learning appears to be more challenging. The daily clinical staff meeting can be web‐based and planned by using dedicated webinar slots, opening an interactive discussion amongst the urologists and residents concerning the recovery of patients; a second daily update can be done in the afternoon. The procedures of the day can be discussed jointly: in this emergency period it is important to choose the best surgical approach and surgeon for the selected patient, in order to maximise the efficacy of the procedure and reduce the risk of adverse events. Moreover, planning strategies concerning the management of COVID‐19 and non‐COVID‐19 patients should be planned according to the hospital administration decrees. Furthermore, thanks to the advent of new telepresence robotic platforms like the Intouch Vita by Intouch Health, Goleta, CA, USA (https://intouchhealth.com/?gdprorigin=true), the morning rounds can be potentially shared with online attendees. Thanks to advanced features including auto‐drive capabilities, remote providers can control or automatically head to a patient care location, having the possibility to live‐broadcast images and audio to physicians in their homes. Finally, notwithstanding the well‐established usefulness of surgical simulation training programmes [6], in this particular historic moment, where the Authorities have limited unnecessary transfers, the access to simulation platforms usually located in hospitals or universities is difficult. Preliminary experiences with home‐made simulators have already been presented, but their real clinical utility is still under investigation. In conclusion, we think that the use of smart technology should be maximised and implemented, in order to guarantee continuity in the learning curve of residents. Now, during this extraordinary emergency in which it is very difficult to predict the duration of disruption, the current necessity should hopefully be translated into a future opportunity, in which smart‐learning can become a useful tool integrated routinely into residency training programmes and urology daily life.

Conflict of interest

None disclosed.
  5 in total

1.  Urology Residency Training in Italy: Results of the First National Survey.

Authors:  Andrea Cocci; Giulio Patruno; Giorgio Gandaglia; Michele Rizzo; Francesco Esperto; Daniele Parnanzini; Amelia Pietropaolo; Emanuele Principi; Michele Talso; Ramona Baldesi; Antonino Battaglia; Ervin Shehu; Francesca Carrobbio; Alfio Corsaro; Roberto La Rocca; Michele Marchioni; Lorenzo Bianchi; Eugenio Miglioranza; Guglielmo Mantica; Eugenio Martorana; Leonardo Misuraca; Dario Fontana; Saverio Forte; Giancarlo Napoli; Giorgio Ivan Russo
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-06-21

2.  Evaluating the usefulness and utility of a webinar as a platform to educate students on a UK clinical academic programme.

Authors:  Hauwa'u Hayat Nadama; Maria Tennyson; Ankur Khajuria
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Edinb       Date:  2019-12

3.  Urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Alberto Abrate; Riccardo Bartoletti; Alessandro Crestani; Cosimo De Nunzio; Gianluca Giannarini; Andrea Gregori; Giovanni Liguori; Vincenzo Mirone; Nicola Pavan; Roberto M Scarpa; Alchiede Simonato; Carlo Trombetta; Andrea Tubaro; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.720

4.  Simulation in Urological Training and Education (SIMULATE): Protocol and curriculum development of the first multicentre international randomized controlled trial assessing the transferability of simulation-based surgical training.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Kamran Ahmed; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Hashim U Ahmed; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 5.969

5.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Journal Club: Experience from the International Urology Journal Club.

Authors:  Isaac A Thangasamy; Stacy Loeb; Niranjan J Sathianathen; Michael Leveridge; Brian Stork; Benjamin J Davies; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2019-11-01
  5 in total
  49 in total

1.  Survey of Canadian urology residency programs: Perception of virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Maylynn Ding; Yuding Wang; Luis Braga; Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.052

2.  Challenging cases in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stefano Tappero; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Mattia Longoni; Carlo Buratto; Erika Palagonia; Pietro Scilipoti; Enrico Vecchio; Marco Martiriggiano; Silvia Secco; Alberto Olivero; Michele Barbieri; Giancarlo Napoli; Elena Strada; Giovanni Petralia; Dario Di Trapani; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Antonio Galfano
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  BMUS journal club on Twitter: An analysis of the first #BMUS_JC discussions.

Authors:  Ruth Reeve; Stephen Moore; Catherine Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-02-11

4.  Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Referrals with Urologic Complaints; a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Anahita Ansari Jafari; Babak Javanmard; Amirhossein Rahavian; Ahmad Reza Rafiezadeh; Nasrin Borumandnia; Seyyed Ali Hojjati; Seyyed Mohammad Hosseininia; Hormoz Karami
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-17

5.  Development, implementation, and uptake of a novel Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) residency recruitment committee strategy in the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Emily Nham; Ravi Kumar; Kristen McAlpine; Christine Seabrook; Marika Valle; Isabel Menard; James Watterson; Matthew Roberts
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 6.  A scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on surgical practice.

Authors:  Amjad Soltany; Mohammed Hamouda; Ansam Ghzawi; Ahmed Sharaqi; Ahmed Negida; Shaimaa Soliman; Amira Yasmine Benmelouka
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-09

7.  Early vascular surgery response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Christopher A Latz; Laura T Boitano; C Y Maximilian Png; Adam Tanious; Pavel Kibrik; Mark Conrad; Matthew Eagleton; Anahita Dua
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  COVID-19: FAQs-Congenital Heart Surgery Recovery and Defining a "New Normal".

Authors:  Joseph A Dearani; Elizabeth H Stephens; Kristine J Guleserian; David M Overman; Carl L Backer; Jennifer C Romano; James D St Louis; George E Sarris; Emile Bacha; James S Tweddell
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 9.  Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on surgical practice - Part 1.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Jabir; Ahmed Kerwan; Maria Nicola; Zaid Alsafi; Mehdi Khan; Catrin Sohrabi; Niamh O'Neill; Christos Iosifidis; Michelle Griffin; Ginimol Mathew; Riaz Agha
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.071

10.  Postgraduate Physiotherapy Training in a Quandary - Ramifications of Corona virus pandemic Lockdown: A Survey-based Study.

Authors:  Shailesh Gardas; Shruti Nair; Pothiraj Pitchai; Vrushali Panhale
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2021-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.