Literature DB >> 32568247

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Jennifer A Geisler1, Jonathan M Spehar2, Sarah A Steck2, Anna Bratasz3, Reena Shakya4, Kimerly Powell3, Gina M Sizemore5.   

Abstract

Metastatic spread of cancer is an unfortunate consequence of disease progression, aggressive cancer subtypes, and/or late diagnosis. Brain metastases are particularly devastating, difficult to treat, and confer a poor prognosis. While the precise incidence of brain metastases in the United States remains hard to estimate, it is likely to increase as extracranial therapies continue to become more efficacious in treating cancer. Thus, it is necessary to identify and develop novel therapeutic approaches to treat metastasis at this site. To this end, intracranial injection of cancer cells has become a well-established method in which to model brain metastasis. Previously, the inability to directly measure tumor growth has been a technical hindrance to this model; however, increasing availability and quality of small animal imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are vastly improving the ability to monitor tumor growth over time and infer changes within the brain during the experimental period. Herein, intracranial injection of murine mammary tumor cells into immunocompetent mice followed by MRI is demonstrated. The presented injection approach utilizes isoflurane anesthesia and a stereotactic setup with a digitally controlled, automated drill and needle injection to enhance precision, and reduce technical error. MRI is measured over time using a 9.4 Tesla instrument in The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center Small Animal Imaging Shared Resource. Tumor volume measurements are demonstrated at each time point through use of ImageJ. Overall, this intracranial injection approach allows for precise injection, day-to-day monitoring, and accurate tumor volume measurements, which combined greatly enhance the utility of this model system to test novel hypotheses on the drivers of brain metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32568247      PMCID: PMC8787807          DOI: 10.3791/61272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  25 in total

Review 1.  Brain metastases: epidemiology.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Christina Huang Wright; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

Review 2.  The Evolving Landscape of Brain Metastasis.

Authors:  Manuel Valiente; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Adrienne Boire; Priscilla K Brastianos; Sarah B Goldberg; Eudocia Q Lee; Emilie Le Rhun; Matthias Preusser; Frank Winkler; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2018-02-21

3.  Changes in BAI1 and nestin expression are prognostic indicators for survival and metastases in breast cancer and provide opportunities for dual targeted therapies.

Authors:  Walter Hans Meisen; Samuel Dubin; Steven T Sizemore; Haritha Mathsyaraja; Katie Thies; Norman L Lehman; Peter Boyer; Alena Cristina Jaime-Ramirez; J Bradley Elder; Kimerly Powell; Arnab Chakravarti; Michael C Ostrowski; Balveen Kaur
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Combination radiotherapy in an orthotopic mouse brain tumor model.

Authors:  Tamalee R Kramp; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Emerging strategies for treating brain metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  David P Kodack; Vasileios Askoxylakis; Gino B Ferraro; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Investigational chemotherapy and novel pharmacokinetic mechanisms for the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases.

Authors:  Neal Shah; Afroz S Mohammad; Pushkar Saralkar; Samuel A Sprowls; Schuyler D Vickers; Devin John; Rachel M Tallman; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Katherine E Jarrell; Mark Pinti; Richard L Nolan; Paul R Lockman
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 7.658

7.  Creating anatomically accurate and reproducible intracranial xenografts of human brain tumors.

Authors:  Angela M Pierce; Amy K Keating
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  A simple guide screw method for intracranial xenograft studies in mice.

Authors:  Jacqueline F Donoghue; Oliver Bogler; Terrance G Johns
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Stromal Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor-β Signaling Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis in the Brain.

Authors:  Katie A Thies; Anisha M Hammer; Blake E Hildreth; Sarah A Steck; Jonathan M Spehar; Raleigh D Kladney; Jennifer A Geisler; Manjusri Das; Luke O Russell; Jerome F Bey; Chelsea M Bolyard; Robert Pilarski; Anthony J Trimboli; Maria C Cuitiño; Christopher S Koivisto; Daniel G Stover; Lynn Schoenfield; Jose Otero; Jonathan P Godbout; Arnab Chakravarti; Matthew D Ringel; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Zaibo Li; Balveen Kaur; Gustavo Leone; Michael C Ostrowski; Steven T Sizemore; Gina M Sizemore
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 13.312

10.  The prognosis analysis of different metastasis pattern in patients with different breast cancer subtypes: a SEER based study.

Authors:  Haiyong Wang; Chenyue Zhang; Jingze Zhang; Li Kong; Hui Zhu; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Features of Craniopharyngioma With Tumoral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Case-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Yusi Chen; Feng Hu; Junwen Wang; Kuan Huang; Weihua Liu; Yutang Tan; Kai Zhao; Qungen Xiao; Ting Lei; Kai Shu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 2.  Multiplex Tissue Imaging: Spatial Revelations in the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Stephanie van Dam; Matthijs J D Baars; Yvonne Vercoulen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.