| Literature DB >> 32565730 |
Jie Yu1, Haibin Liu2, Shuli He3, Pingping Li4, Chunxiao Ma5, Minglei Ma1, Yiwen Liu1, Lu Lv1, Fan Ping1, Huabing Zhang1, Wei Li1, Qi Sun1, Lingling Xu1, Yuxiu Li1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we assessed the effects of dietary magnesium on leukocyte telomere length (LTL). DESIGNS: The current cross-sectional analysis was based on data collected within a type 2 diabetes project. Settings. Dietary magnesium intake is associated with peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length (LTL). However, few epidemiological studies have evaluated the effects of magnesium on LTL in the clinical setting. Participants. This cross-sectional analysis included 467 participants (34.8% men). Measurements. Serum blood lipid profile, HbA1c, oxidative stress, and proinflammatory mediator levels were measured. Detailed dietary data were obtained using a 24 h food recall. LTL was assessed using a real-time PCR assay. Regression models and simple regulatory models were used for data analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32565730 PMCID: PMC7261336 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7610436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Characteristics and dietary intake of participants by quartiles according to LTL.
| Parameters | Overall | Shortest LTL | Longer LTL |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aLTL | 28.33 ± 0.03 | 27.61 ± 0.05 | 29.04 ± 0.03 | <0.001∗ |
| Male ( | 164 (34.8%) | 39 (33.1%) | 125 (35.4%) | 0.641 |
| Age (years) | 52.8 ± 11.4 | 53.7 ± 10.8 | 52.5 ± 11.6 | 0.308 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.14 ± 0.28 | 25.80 ± 0.48 | 26.48 ± 0.28 | 0.218 |
| Central obesity ( | 244 (52.9%) | 61 (52.6%) | 183 (53.0%) | 0.932 |
| Hypertension ( | 233 (50.2%) | 63 (53.8%) | 170 (49.0%) | 0.364 |
| HbA1c (%) | 272 (59.6%) | 66 (58.4%) | 206 (60.1%) | 0.756 |
| LnTG (mmol/L) | 0.39 ± 0.63 | 0.38 ± 0.54 | 0.41 ± 0.65 | 0.673 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.87 ± 0.73 | 2.86 ± 0.76 | 2.87 ± 0.72 | 0.941 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.31 ± 0.41 | 1.34 ± 0.56 | 1.30 ± 0.34 | 0.37 |
| TNF | 23.86 ± 10.44 | 28.34 ± 9.23 | 22.34 ± 10.40 | <0.001∗ |
| Energy (kcal/day) | 1579.39 ± 698.49 | 1651.6 ± 730.03 | 1555.77 ± 687.39 | 0.225 |
| Protein (% energy) | 11.2% ± 3.3% | 11.8% ± 3.2% | 11.0% ± 3.3% | 0.038∗ |
| Fat (% energy) | 25.0% ± 16.1% | 21.9% ± 13.6% | 26.0% ± 16.8% | 0.027∗ |
| Carbohydrate (% energy) | 65.8% ± 16.6% | 69.2% ± 17.1% | 64.6% ± 16.3% | 0.014∗ |
| bMagnesium (mg/day) | 247.13 ± 10.29 | 278.18 ± 17.86 | 216.08 ± 10.21 | 0.003∗ |
| cMagnesium (mg/day) | 242.67 ± 7.33 | 264.93 ± 12.73 | 220.42 ± 7.28 | 0.003∗ |
| Magnesium (mg/1000 kcal) | 149.75 ± 3.19 | 160.66 ± 5.54 | 138.85 ± 3.17 | 0.001∗ |
∗Statistical significance was inferred when the P value was less than 0.05. aLTL adjusted according to age and sex and expressed as mean ± SE. bUnadjusted magnesium intake, expressed as mean ± SD. cMagnesium intake adjusted according to energy intake, expressed as mean ± SE; other continuous variables were expressed as means ± SDs.
LTL and TNFα by quartiles according to magnesium intake per 1000 kcal energy.
| Model | Q1 ( | Q2 ( | Q3 (n = 117) | Q4 ( |
| Q4–Q1 | % of Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg | 89.20 ± 2.77 | 120.43 ± 2.77 | 153.05 ± 2.77 | 237.22 ± 2.77 | — | — | — | |
| LTL | 1 | 28.89 ± 0.08 | 28.79 ± 0.08 | 28.69 ± 0.80 | 28.36 ± 0.09 | <0.001∗ | -0.53 | -1.8 |
| 2 | 28.90 ± 0.08 | 28.80 ± 0.08 | 28.71 ± 0.08 | 28.35 ± 0.09 | <0.001∗ | -0.55 | -1.9 | |
| TNF | 1 | 21.51 ± 0.91 | 21.45 ± 0.93 | 23.72 ± 0.93 | 25.53 ± 0.92 | 0.004∗ | 4.02 | 18.9 |
| 2 | 21.54 ± 0.93 | 21.07 ± 0.95 | 23.59 ± 0.92 | 25.33 ± 0.95 | 0.006∗ | 3.79 | 17.6 |
∗Statistical significance was inferred when the P value was less than 0.05; results are depicted as means ± SEs; ANCOVA was used to derive the P for trend values. Q4–Q1 is the value in Q4 minus the value in Q1. % of Q1 represents the difference between Q4 and Q1 with respect to the Q1 value. Model 1 was adjusted for sex and age, whereas Model 2 was adjusted for hypertension, central obesity, sex, age, HbA1c, LnTG, and HDL-C.
Odds ratios and 95% CIs for lowest LTL and highest TNFα across Mg intake.
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
| 1SD increment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| LTL | 1 | 1.17 (0.57–2.38) | 1.76 (0.90–3.43) | 2.60 (1.31–5.16) | 0.003∗ | 1.49 (1.16–1.92) |
| TNF | 1 | 0.83 (0.43–1.58) | 1.29 (0.71–2.37) | 1.98 (1.09–3.59) | 0.008∗ | 1.25 (1.02–1.52) |
∗Statistical significance was inferred when the P value was less than 0.05; models were adjusted according to age, sex, central obesity, hypertension, HbA1c, LnTG, and HDL-C.
Figure 1TNFα as mediator of the effects of magnesium intake on LTL. All variables were modeled as continuous variables. The model was adjusted according to age, sex, central obesity, hypertension, HbA1c, LnTG, and HDL-C.
Figure 2Contributions of different foods to magnesium intake in our study population and a western population. The data of the above bar were adopted and slightly modified from an article by Welch et al. [15]. The data of below the bar were generated from our study population.