| Literature DB >> 32564456 |
Jun Ge1, Xiaoqiang Cheng1, Qi Yan1, Cenhao Wu1, Yingjie Wang1, Hao Yu1, Huilin Yang1, Feng Zhou1, Jun Zou1.
Abstract
Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is the most critical factor that causes low back pain. Molecular biotherapy is a fundamental strategy for IVDD treatment. Calcitonin can promote the proliferation of chondrocytes, stimulate the synthesis of matrix and prevent cartilage degeneration. However, its effect and the underlying mechanism for IVDD have not been fully revealed. Chondrogenic specific matrix components' mRNA expression of nucleus pulposus cell (NPC) was determined by qPCR. Protein expression of NPC matrix components and protein kinase C was determined by Western blotting. A rat caudal intervertebral disc degeneration model was established and tested for calcitonin in vivo. IL-1 induced NPC change via decreasing protein kinase C (PKC)-ε phosphorylation, while increasing PKC-δ phosphorylation. Calcitonin treatment could prevent or reverse IL-1-induced cellular change on PKC signalling associated with degeneration. The positive effect of calcitonin on IVDD in vivo was verified on a rat caudal model. In summary, this study, for the first time, elucidated the important role of calcitonin in the regulation of matrix components in the nucleus of the intervertebral disc. Calcitonin can delay degeneration of the intervertebral disc nucleus by activating the PKC-ε pathway and inhibiting the PKC-δ pathway.Entities:
Keywords: calcitonin; intervertebral disc degeneration; protein kinase C; rat caudal model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32564456 PMCID: PMC7412402 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Names and sequences of target genes and a house‐keeping reference GAPDH gene
| Primer | Sequence |
|---|---|
| Collagen II‐F | TGCTGCCCAGATGGCTGGAGGA |
| Collagen II‐R | TGCCTTGAAATCCTTGAGGCCC |
| Aggrecan‐F | CTACCGCTGCGAGGTGATG |
| Aggrecan‐R | AGTCGAGGGTGTAGCGTGTAGAG |
| CollagenX‐F | TGCTGCCACAAATACCCTTT |
| Collagen X‐R | GTGGACCAGGAGTACCTTGC |
| GAPDH‐F | CCCCCAATGTATCCGTTGTG |
| GAPDH‐R | TAGCCCAGGATGCCCTTTAGT |
Grading for morphology
| Morphology Change Under Optical Microscope | Grade | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | Annulus Fibrosus (AF) | Normal texture and free of damage and distortion | 1 |
| The damaged and distortion area is less than 30% | 2 | ||
| The damaged and distortion area is more than 30% | 3 | ||
| Ⅱ | Boundary between AF and NP | Normal | 1 |
| Micro disrupted | 2 | ||
| Medium or severe disrupted | 3 | ||
| Ⅲ | NP Cells | Normal cells with large amounts of vacuoles | 1 |
| Cells and vacuoles decreased slightly | 2 | ||
| Cells decreased moderately or severely without vacuoles | 3 | ||
| Ⅳ | NP Matrix | Normal gel appearance | 1 |
| Slightly congealed | 2 | ||
| Moderate or severe condensation | 3 | ||
Figure 1A. IL‐1 treatment decreases PKC‐ε phosphorylation and increases PKC‐δ phosphorylation. B, C and D. Quantitative analysis of the Western blot showed that at a concentration of over 10 ng/mL, IL‐1 could significantly affect the expression of type II collagen, aggrecan and type X collagen. E and F. Quantitative analysis of the Western blot showed that a concentration of IL‐1 over 10 ng/mL could significantly affect PKC signalling (*P < .05)
Figure 2A. IL‐10 treatment could decrease the inhibition effects of IL‐1 on collagen II mRNA expression (*P < .05). B. IL‐1 increases the mRNA expression of collagen X, while IL‐10 treatment could reduce collagen X mRNA expression in a dose‐dependent manner (*P < .05). C. IL‐10 treatment could alleviate the inhibition effects of IL‐1 on aggrecan mRNA expression (*P < .05)
Figure 3A. IL‐10 treatment stimulates the synthesis of the NPC matrix via activating the PKC‐ε pathway and inhibiting the PKC‐δ pathway. B, C and D. Quantitative analysis of the Western blot showed that a concentration of IL‐10 over 10 ng/mL could significantly affect the synthesis of the NPC matrix (*P < .05). A low concentration of IL‐10 treatment could increase the protein level of collagen II while decreasing that of collagen X (*P < .05). E and F. A concentration of IL‐10 over 10 ng/mL could significantly affect the PKC‐ε pathway and inhibiting the PKC‐δ pathway (*P < .05)
Figure 4A. MRI scan showed that calcitonin alleviates the rat caudal IVD in the 4th week after injection. B. Pfirrmann score showed that calcitonin alleviates the rat caudal IVD morphologically (*P < .05)
Figure 5A. Histological analysis of rat caudal IVDD in the 4th week after injection. B. Semi‐quantitative analysis of HE staining showed that calcitonin alleviates the rat caudal IVDD histologically. C. The mean optical density of collagen II in the calcitonin group is higher than in degeneration and saline groups, but lower than normal group (*P < .05). D. The mean optical density of collagen X in the calcitonin group is lower than in degeneration and saline groups, but higher than normal group (*P < .05). E. The mean optical density of PKC‐ε in the calcitonin group is higher than in degeneration and saline groups (*P < .05). F. The mean optical density of PKC‐δ in the calcitonin group is significantly lower than in degeneration and saline groups, but higher than normal group (*P < .05)