Literature DB >> 32563448

Livestock Gene Editing by One-step Embryo Manipulation.

Sergio Navarro-Serna1, Marcela Vilarino2, Insung Park2, Joaquin Gadea3, Pablo Juan Ross4.   

Abstract

The breakthrough and rapid advance of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology has enabled the efficient generation of gene-edited animals by one-step embryo manipulation. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated protein 9 delivery to the livestock embryos has been typically achieved by intracytoplasmic microinjection; however, recent studies show that electroporation may be a reliable, efficient, and practical method for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. The source of embryos used to generate gene-edited animals varies from in vivo to in vitro produced, depending mostly on the species of interest. In addition, different Cas9 and gRNA reagents can be used for embryo editing, ranging from Cas9-coding plasmid or messenger RNA to Cas9 recombinant protein, which can be combined with in vitro transcribed or synthetic guide RNAs. Mosaicism is reported as one of the main problems with generation of animals by embryo editing. On the other hand, off-target mutations are rarely found in livestock derived from one-step editing. In this review, we discussed these and other aspects of generating gene-edited animals by single-step embryo manipulation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Animal model; CRISPR/Cas9; Embryo; Gene editing; Livestock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32563448     DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Equine Vet Sci        ISSN: 0737-0806            Impact factor:   1.583


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pluripotent Core in Bovine Embryos: A Review.

Authors:  Luis Aguila; Claudia Osycka-Salut; Favian Treulen; Ricardo Felmer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 2.  Improvements in Gene Editing Technology Boost Its Applications in Livestock.

Authors:  Iuri Viotti Perisse; Zhiqiang Fan; Galina N Singina; Kenneth L White; Irina A Polejaeva
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Towards progressive regulatory approaches for agricultural applications of animal biotechnology.

Authors:  Eric M Hallerman; Justin P Bredlau; Luiz Sergio A Camargo; Maria Lucia Zaidan Dagli; Margaret Karembu; Godfrey Ngure; Rhodora Romero-Aldemita; Pedro Jesús Rocha-Salavarrieta; Mark Tizard; Mark Walton; Diane Wray-Cahen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Protocol for assessment of the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas RNP delivery to different types of target cells.

Authors:  Marina A Tyumentseva; Aleksandr I Tyumentsev; Vasiliy G Akimkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of Aphidicolin, a Reversible Inhibitor of Eukaryotic Nuclear DNA Replication, on the Production of Genetically Modified Porcine Embryos by CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Sergio Navarro-Serna; Celia Piñeiro-Silva; Chiara Luongo; John Parrington; Raquel Romar; Joaquín Gadea
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Simulating the Commercial Implementation of Gene-Editing for Influenza A Virus Resistance in Pigs: An Economic and Genetic Analysis.

Authors:  Hamish A Salvesen; Timothy J Byrne; C Bruce A Whitelaw; Fiona S Hely
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  Harnessing endogenous repair mechanisms for targeted gene knock-in of bovine embryos.

Authors:  Joseph R Owen; Sadie L Hennig; Bret R McNabb; Jason C Lin; Amy E Young; James D Murray; Pablo J Ross; Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Impact of CRISPR-Cas9-Based Genome Engineering in Farm Animals.

Authors:  Parul Singh; Syed Azmal Ali
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.