Literature DB >> 33603767

Improvements in Gene Editing Technology Boost Its Applications in Livestock.

Iuri Viotti Perisse1, Zhiqiang Fan1, Galina N Singina2, Kenneth L White1, Irina A Polejaeva1.   

Abstract

Accelerated development of novel CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing techniques provides a feasible approach to introduce a variety of precise modifications in the mammalian genome, including introduction of multiple edits simultaneously, efficient insertion of long DNA sequences into specific targeted loci as well as performing nucleotide transitions and transversions. Thus, the CRISPR/Cas9 tool has become the method of choice for introducing genome alterations in livestock species. The list of new CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing tools is constantly expanding. Here, we discuss the methods developed to improve efficiency and specificity of gene editing tools as well as approaches that can be employed for gene regulation, base editing, and epigenetic modifications. Additionally, advantages and disadvantages of two primary methods used for the production of gene-edited farm animals: somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT or cloning) and zygote manipulations will be discussed. Furthermore, we will review agricultural and biomedical applications of gene editing technology.
Copyright © 2021 Perisse, Fan, Singina, White and Polejaeva.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; agriculture; animal models; gene editing; livestock

Year:  2021        PMID: 33603767      PMCID: PMC7885404          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.614688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


  270 in total

1.  Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member.

Authors:  A C McPherron; A M Lawler; S J Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Improved Genome Editing Efficiency and Flexibility Using Modified Oligonucleotides with TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 Nucleases.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Renaud; Charlotte Boix; Marine Charpentier; Anne De Cian; Julien Cochennec; Evelyne Duvernois-Berthet; Loïc Perrouault; Laurent Tesson; Joanne Edouard; Reynald Thinard; Yacine Cherifi; Séverine Menoret; Sandra Fontanière; Noémie de Crozé; Alexandre Fraichard; Frédéric Sohm; Ignacio Anegon; Jean-Paul Concordet; Carine Giovannangeli
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Creating class I MHC-null pigs using guide RNA and the Cas9 endonuclease.

Authors:  Luz M Reyes; Jose L Estrada; Zheng Yu Wang; Rachel J Blosser; Rashod F Smith; Richard A Sidner; Leela L Paris; Ross L Blankenship; Caitlin N Ray; Aaron C Miner; Matthew Tector; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle.

Authors:  L Grobet; L J Martin; D Poncelet; D Pirottin; B Brouwers; J Riquet; A Schoeberlein; S Dunner; F Ménissier; J Massabanda; R Fries; R Hanset; M Georges
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  CRISPR-engineered mosaicism rapidly reveals that loss of Kcnj13 function in mice mimics human disease phenotypes.

Authors:  Hua Zhong; Yiyun Chen; Yumei Li; Rui Chen; Graeme Mardon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  One-step generation of triple gene-targeted pigs using CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors:  Xianlong Wang; Chunwei Cao; Jiaojiao Huang; Jing Yao; Tang Hai; Qiantao Zheng; Xiao Wang; Hongyong Zhang; Guosong Qin; Jinbo Cheng; Yanfang Wang; Zengqiang Yuan; Qi Zhou; Hongmei Wang; Jianguo Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  DNA mismatch repair and oligonucleotide end-protection promote base-pair substitution distal from a CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA break.

Authors:  Tim Harmsen; Sjoerd Klaasen; Henri van de Vrugt; Hein Te Riele
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Frequency of off-targeting in genome edited pigs produced via direct injection of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into developing embryos.

Authors:  Kayla Carey; Junghyun Ryu; Kyungjun Uh; Andrea J Lengi; Sherrie Clark-Deener; Benjamin A Corl; Kiho Lee
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.563

Review 9.  An Overview of the CRISPR-Based Genomic- and Epigenome-Editing System: Function, Applications, and Challenges.

Authors:  Saeed Bozorg Qomi; Amir Asghari; Majid Mojarrad
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2019-08-21

Review 10.  A future for transgenic livestock.

Authors:  John Clark; Bruce Whitelaw
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 53.242

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A New Toolbox in Experimental Embryology-Alternative Model Organisms for Studying Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Claudia Springer; Eckhard Wolf; Kilian Simmet
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-02

Review 2.  Application of Gene Editing Technology in Resistance Breeding of Livestock.

Authors:  Sutian Wang; Zixiao Qu; Qiuyan Huang; Jianfeng Zhang; Sen Lin; Yecheng Yang; Fanming Meng; Jianhao Li; Kunli Zhang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18

3.  Quantitative analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated provirus deletion in blue egg layer chicken PGCs by digital PCR.

Authors:  Stefanie Altgilbers; Claudia Dierks; Sabine Klein; Steffen Weigend; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Improved development of mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos by chlamydocin analogues, class I and IIa histone deacetylase inhibitors†.

Authors:  Satoshi Kamimura; Kimiko Inoue; Eiji Mizutani; Jin-Moon Kim; Hiroki Inoue; Narumi Ogonuki; Kei Miyamoto; Shunya Ihashi; Nobuhiko Itami; Teruhiko Wakayama; Akihiro Ito; Norikazu Nishino; Minoru Yoshida; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.285

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.