Literature DB >> 31718860

Can microplastics pose a threat to ocean carbon sequestration?

Maocai Shen1, Shujing Ye1, Guangming Zeng2, Yaxin Zhang3, Lang Xing1, Wangwang Tang1, Xiaofeng Wen1, Shaoheng Liu4.   

Abstract

Global climate change has attracted worldwide attention. The ocean is the largest active carbon pool on the planet and plays an important role in global climate change. However, marine plastic pollution is getting increasingly serious due to the large consumption and mismanagement of global plastics. The impact of marine plastics on ecosystem responsible for the gas exchange and circulation of marine CO2 may cause more greenhouse gas emissions. Consequently, in this paper, threats of marine microplastics to ocean carbon sequestration are discussed. Marine microplastics can 1) affect phytoplankton photosynthesis and growth; 2) have toxic effects on zooplankton and affect their development and reproduction; 3) affect marine biological pump; and 4) affect ocean carbon stock. Phytoplankton and zooplankton are the most important producer and consumer of the ocean. As such, clearly, further research should be needed to explore the potential scale and scope of this impact, and its underlying mechanisms.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Marine biological pump; Marine plastic pollution; Microplastics; Ocean carbon sequestration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31718860     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  8 in total

1.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

2.  Covid-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment.

Authors:  Oluniyi O Fadare; Elvis D Okoffo
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Environmental risks of polymer materials from disposable face masks linked to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Hao Du; Shushi Huang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  PPE pollution in the terrestrial and aquatic environment of the Chittagong city area associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and concomitant health implications.

Authors:  Md Jainal Abedin; Mayeen Uddin Khandaker; Md Ripaj Uddin; Md Rezaul Karim; M Shahab Uddin Ahamad; Md Ariful Islam; Abu Mohammad Arif; Abdelmoneim Sulieman; Abubakr M Idris
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Wet wipes and disposable surgical masks are becoming new sources of fiber microplastic pollution during global COVID-19.

Authors:  Tong Hu; Maocai Shen; Wangwang Tang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Regeneration of an electret filter by contact electrification.

Authors:  Jakyung Eun; Hansol Lee; Sangmin Jeon
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.361

7.  The coastal waters of the south-east Bay of Biscay a dead-end for neustonic plastics.

Authors:  Oihane C Basurko; Irene Ruiz; Anna Rubio; Beatriz Beldarrain; Deniz Kukul; Andrés Cózar; Matteo Galli; Théo Destang; Joana Larreta
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 7.001

8.  Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario.

Authors:  Tadele Assefa Aragaw
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 5.553

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.