Mary D Chamberlin1,2,3, Jason D Wells4, Kevin Shee4, Jennifer R Bean4, Jonathan D Marotti5,6, Wendy A Wells5,6, Heidi W Trask7, Fred W Kolling7, Ananta Bhatt8, Peter A Kaufman8,5, Gary N Schwartz8,5, John M Gemery9, Nancy J McNulty9, Michael J Tsapakos9, Richard J Barth5,10, Bradley A Arrick8,5, Jiang Gui11, Todd W Miller12,13,14. 1. Department of Medicine, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. Mary.D.Chamberlin@Hitchcock.org. 2. Comprehensive Breast Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. Mary.D.Chamberlin@Hitchcock.org. 3. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Dr., Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. Mary.D.Chamberlin@Hitchcock.org. 4. Department of Molecular & Systems Biology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 5. Comprehensive Breast Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 6. Department of Pathology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 7. Genomics Shared Resource, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 8. Department of Medicine, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 9. Department of Radiology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 10. Department of Surgery, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 11. Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 12. Comprehensive Breast Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. Todd.W.Miller@Dartmouth.edu. 13. Department of Molecular & Systems Biology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. Todd.W.Miller@Dartmouth.edu. 14. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Dr., HB-7936, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. Todd.W.Miller@Dartmouth.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA in plasma may present a minimally invasive opportunity to identify tumor-derived mutations to inform selection of targeted therapies for individual patients, particularly in cases of oligometastatic disease where biopsy of multiple tumors is impractical. To assess the utility of plasma DNA as a "liquid biopsy" for precision oncology, we tested whether sequencing of plasma DNA is a reliable surrogate for sequencing of tumor DNA to identify targetable genetic alterations. METHODS: Blood and biopsies of 1-3 tumors were obtained from 4 evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer. One patient provided samples from an additional 7 tumors post-mortem. DNA extracted from plasma, tumor tissues, and buffy coat of blood were used for probe-directed capture of all exons in 149 cancer-related genes and massively parallel sequencing. Somatic mutations in DNA from plasma and tumors were identified by comparison to buffy coat DNA. RESULTS: Sequencing of plasma DNA identified 27.94 ± 11.81% (mean ± SD) of mutations detected in a tumor(s) from the same patient; such mutations tended to be present at high allelic frequency. The majority of mutations found in plasma DNA were not found in tumor samples. Mutations were also found in plasma that matched clinically undetectable tumors found post-mortem. CONCLUSIONS: The incomplete overlap of genetic alteration profiles of plasma and tumors warrants caution in the sole reliance of plasma DNA to identify therapeutically targetable alterations in patients and indicates that analysis of plasma DNA complements, but does not replace, tumor DNA profiling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Subjects were prospectively enrolled in trial NCT01836640 (registered April 22, 2013).
PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA in plasma may present a minimally invasive opportunity to identify tumor-derived mutations to inform selection of targeted therapies for individual patients, particularly in cases of oligometastatic disease where biopsy of multiple tumors is impractical. To assess the utility of plasma DNA as a "liquid biopsy" for precision oncology, we tested whether sequencing of plasma DNA is a reliable surrogate for sequencing of tumor DNA to identify targetable genetic alterations. METHODS: Blood and biopsies of 1-3 tumors were obtained from 4 evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer. One patient provided samples from an additional 7 tumors post-mortem. DNA extracted from plasma, tumor tissues, and buffy coat of blood were used for probe-directed capture of all exons in 149 cancer-related genes and massively parallel sequencing. Somatic mutations in DNA from plasma and tumors were identified by comparison to buffy coat DNA. RESULTS: Sequencing of plasma DNA identified 27.94 ± 11.81% (mean ± SD) of mutations detected in a tumor(s) from the same patient; such mutations tended to be present at high allelic frequency. The majority of mutations found in plasma DNA were not found in tumor samples. Mutations were also found in plasma that matched clinically undetectable tumors found post-mortem. CONCLUSIONS: The incomplete overlap of genetic alteration profiles of plasma and tumors warrants caution in the sole reliance of plasma DNA to identify therapeutically targetable alterations in patients and indicates that analysis of plasma DNA complements, but does not replace, tumor DNA profiling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Subjects were prospectively enrolled in trial NCT01836640 (registered April 22, 2013).
Entities:
Keywords:
Advanced breast cancer; Cell-free DNA; Circulating tumor DNA; DNA sequencing
Authors: Y M Dennis Lo; K C Allen Chan; Hao Sun; Eric Z Chen; Peiyong Jiang; Fiona M F Lun; Yama W Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Tze K Lau; Charles R Cantor; Rossa W K Chiu Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Daniel C Koboldt; Qunyuan Zhang; David E Larson; Dong Shen; Michael D McLellan; Ling Lin; Christopher A Miller; Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Jeffrey A Engelman; Pasi A Jänne; Craig Mermel; Joseph Pearlberg; Toru Mukohara; Christina Fleet; Karen Cichowski; Bruce E Johnson; Lewis C Cantley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dejan Juric; Pau Castel; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith; Helen H Won; Haley Ellis; Saya H Ebbesen; Benjamin J Ainscough; Avinash Ramu; Gopa Iyer; Ronak H Shah; Tiffany Huynh; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Dennis Sgroi; Steven Isakoff; Ashraf Thabet; Leila Elamine; David B Solit; Scott W Lowe; Cornelia Quadt; Malte Peters; Adnan Derti; Robert Schegel; Alan Huang; Elaine R Mardis; Michael F Berger; José Baselga; Maurizio Scaltriti Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Johanne A Hojbjerg; Anne T Madsen; Hjordis H Schmidt; Steffen F Sorensen; Magnus Stougaard; Peter Meldgaard; Boe S Sorensen Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Lesley-Ann Martin; Sunil Pancholi; Ian Farmer; Stephanie Guest; Ricardo Ribas; Marion T Weigel; Allan M Thornhill; Zara Ghazoui; Roger A'Hern; Dean B Evans; Heidi A Lane; Stephen R Johnston; Mitch Dowsett Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 6.466