Literature DB >> 32562118

Plasma DNA as a "liquid biopsy" incompletely complements tumor biopsy for identification of mutations in a case series of four patients with oligometastatic breast cancer.

Mary D Chamberlin1,2,3, Jason D Wells4, Kevin Shee4, Jennifer R Bean4, Jonathan D Marotti5,6, Wendy A Wells5,6, Heidi W Trask7, Fred W Kolling7, Ananta Bhatt8, Peter A Kaufman8,5, Gary N Schwartz8,5, John M Gemery9, Nancy J McNulty9, Michael J Tsapakos9, Richard J Barth5,10, Bradley A Arrick8,5, Jiang Gui11, Todd W Miller12,13,14.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA in plasma may present a minimally invasive opportunity to identify tumor-derived mutations to inform selection of targeted therapies for individual patients, particularly in cases of oligometastatic disease where biopsy of multiple tumors is impractical. To assess the utility of plasma DNA as a "liquid biopsy" for precision oncology, we tested whether sequencing of plasma DNA is a reliable surrogate for sequencing of tumor DNA to identify targetable genetic alterations.
METHODS: Blood and biopsies of 1-3 tumors were obtained from 4 evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer. One patient provided samples from an additional 7 tumors post-mortem. DNA extracted from plasma, tumor tissues, and buffy coat of blood were used for probe-directed capture of all exons in 149 cancer-related genes and massively parallel sequencing. Somatic mutations in DNA from plasma and tumors were identified by comparison to buffy coat DNA.
RESULTS: Sequencing of plasma DNA identified 27.94 ± 11.81% (mean ± SD) of mutations detected in a tumor(s) from the same patient; such mutations tended to be present at high allelic frequency. The majority of mutations found in plasma DNA were not found in tumor samples. Mutations were also found in plasma that matched clinically undetectable tumors found post-mortem.
CONCLUSIONS: The incomplete overlap of genetic alteration profiles of plasma and tumors warrants caution in the sole reliance of plasma DNA to identify therapeutically targetable alterations in patients and indicates that analysis of plasma DNA complements, but does not replace, tumor DNA profiling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Subjects were prospectively enrolled in trial NCT01836640 (registered April 22, 2013).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced breast cancer; Cell-free DNA; Circulating tumor DNA; DNA sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32562118      PMCID: PMC7375191          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05714-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  49 in total

1.  Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus.

Authors:  Y M Dennis Lo; K C Allen Chan; Hao Sun; Eric Z Chen; Peiyong Jiang; Fiona M F Lun; Yama W Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Tze K Lau; Charles R Cantor; Rossa W K Chiu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel C Koboldt; Qunyuan Zhang; David E Larson; Dong Shen; Michael D McLellan; Ling Lin; Christopher A Miller; Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Circulating Cell-Free Tumor DNA Analysis of 50 Genes by Next-Generation Sequencing in the Prospective MOSCATO Trial.

Authors:  Cécile Jovelet; Ecaterina Ileana; Marie-Cécile Le Deley; Nelly Motté; Silvia Rosellini; Alfredo Romero; Celine Lefebvre; Marion Pedrero; Noémie Pata-Merci; Nathalie Droin; Marc Deloger; Christophe Massard; Antoine Hollebecque; Charles Ferté; Amélie Boichard; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Maud Ngo-Camus; Thierry De Baere; Philippe Vielh; Jean-Yves Scoazec; Gilles Vassal; Alexander Eggermont; Fabrice André; Jean-Charles Soria; Ludovic Lacroix
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  How to differentiate benign versus malignant cardiac and paracardiac 18F FDG uptake at oncologic PET/CT.

Authors:  Alan H Maurer; Mark Burshteyn; Lee P Adler; Robert M Steiner
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  ErbB-3 mediates phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in gefitinib-sensitive non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Engelman; Pasi A Jänne; Craig Mermel; Joseph Pearlberg; Toru Mukohara; Christina Fleet; Karen Cichowski; Bruce E Johnson; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  hsp70 is not required for high affinity binding of purified calf uterine estrogen receptor to estrogen response element DNA in vitro.

Authors:  C M Klinge; C L Brolly; R A Bambara; R Hilf
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.292

7.  Quantitative detection of EGFR mutations in circulating tumor DNA derived from lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Kazuya Taniguchi; Junji Uchida; Kazumi Nishino; Toru Kumagai; Takako Okuyama; Jiro Okami; Masahiko Higashiyama; Ken Kodama; Fumio Imamura; Kikuya Kato
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Convergent loss of PTEN leads to clinical resistance to a PI(3)Kα inhibitor.

Authors:  Dejan Juric; Pau Castel; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith; Helen H Won; Haley Ellis; Saya H Ebbesen; Benjamin J Ainscough; Avinash Ramu; Gopa Iyer; Ronak H Shah; Tiffany Huynh; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Dennis Sgroi; Steven Isakoff; Ashraf Thabet; Leila Elamine; David B Solit; Scott W Lowe; Cornelia Quadt; Malte Peters; Adnan Derti; Robert Schegel; Alan Huang; Elaine R Mardis; Michael F Berger; José Baselga; Maurizio Scaltriti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Intra-individual variation of circulating tumour DNA in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Johanne A Hojbjerg; Anne T Madsen; Hjordis H Schmidt; Steffen F Sorensen; Magnus Stougaard; Peter Meldgaard; Boe S Sorensen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Effectiveness and molecular interactions of the clinically active mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus in combination with tamoxifen or letrozole in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Lesley-Ann Martin; Sunil Pancholi; Ian Farmer; Stephanie Guest; Ricardo Ribas; Marion T Weigel; Allan M Thornhill; Zara Ghazoui; Roger A'Hern; Dean B Evans; Heidi A Lane; Stephen R Johnston; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.