Literature DB >> 26758560

Circulating Cell-Free Tumor DNA Analysis of 50 Genes by Next-Generation Sequencing in the Prospective MOSCATO Trial.

Cécile Jovelet1, Ecaterina Ileana2, Marie-Cécile Le Deley3, Nelly Motté4, Silvia Rosellini5, Alfredo Romero4, Celine Lefebvre6, Marion Pedrero6, Noémie Pata-Merci7, Nathalie Droin7, Marc Deloger8, Christophe Massard9, Antoine Hollebecque9, Charles Ferté10, Amélie Boichard4, Sophie Postel-Vinay11, Maud Ngo-Camus9, Thierry De Baere12, Philippe Vielh13, Jean-Yves Scoazec14, Gilles Vassal15, Alexander Eggermont16, Fabrice André17, Jean-Charles Soria18, Ludovic Lacroix19.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Liquid biopsies based on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis are described as surrogate samples for molecular analysis. We evaluated the concordance between tumor DNA (tDNA) and cfDNA analysis on a large cohort of patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumor, eligible for phase I trial and with good performance status, enrolled in MOSCATO 01 trial (clinical trial NCT01566019). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Blood samples were collected at inclusion and cfDNA was extracted from plasma for 334 patients. Hotspot mutations were screened using next-generation sequencing for 50 cancer genes.
RESULTS: Among the 283 patients with tDNA-cfDNA pairs, 121 had mutation in both, 99 in tumor only, 5 in cfDNA only, and for 58 patients no mutation was detected, leading to a 55.0% estimated sensitivity [95% confidence interval (CI), 48.4%-61.6%] at the patient level. Among the 220 patients with mutations in tDNA, the sensitivity of cfDNA analysis was significantly linked to the number of metastatic sites, albumin level, tumor type, and number of lines of treatment. A sensitivity prediction score could be derived from clinical parameters. Sensitivity is 83% in patients with a high score (≥8). In addition, we analyzed cfDNA for 51 patients without available tissue sample. Mutations were detected for 22 patients, including 19 oncogenic variants and 8 actionable mutations.
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of somatic mutations in cfDNA is feasible for prescreening phase I candidates with a satisfactory specificity; overall sensitivity can be improved by a sensitivity score allowing to select patients for whom cfDNA constitutes a reliable noninvasive surrogate to screen mutations. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2960-8. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26758560     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  42 in total

1.  Comparative clinical utility of tumor genomic testing and cell-free DNA in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kara N Maxwell; Danielle Soucier-Ernst; Emin Tahirovic; Andrea B Troxel; Candace Clark; Michael Feldman; Christopher Colameco; Bijal Kakrecha; Melissa Langer; David Lieberman; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Matt R Paul; Tien-Chi Pan; Stephanie Yee; Natalie Shih; Erica Carpenter; Lewis A Chodosh; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Development and Validation of an Ultradeep Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Testing of Plasma Cell-Free DNA from Patients with Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Filip Janku; Shile Zhang; Jill Waters; Li Liu; Helen J Huang; Vivek Subbiah; David S Hong; Daniel D Karp; Siqing Fu; Xuyu Cai; Nishma M Ramzanali; Kiran Madwani; Goran Cabrilo; Debra L Andrews; Yue Zhao; Milind Javle; E Scott Kopetz; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Hyunsung J Kim; Sante Gnerre; Ravi Vijaya Satya; Han-Yu Chuang; Kristina M Kruglyak; Jonathan Toung; Chen Zhao; Richard Shen; John V Heymach; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Gordon B Mills; Jian-Bing Fan; Neeraj S Salathia
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Plasma DNA as a "liquid biopsy" incompletely complements tumor biopsy for identification of mutations in a case series of four patients with oligometastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary D Chamberlin; Jason D Wells; Kevin Shee; Jennifer R Bean; Jonathan D Marotti; Wendy A Wells; Heidi W Trask; Fred W Kolling; Ananta Bhatt; Peter A Kaufman; Gary N Schwartz; John M Gemery; Nancy J McNulty; Michael J Tsapakos; Richard J Barth; Bradley A Arrick; Jiang Gui; Todd W Miller
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Paulo G Bergerot; Andrew W Hahn; Cristiane Decat Bergerot; Jeremy Jones; Sumanta Kumar Pal
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-02-20

Review 5.  Routine clinical use of circulating tumor cells for diagnosis of mutations and chromosomal rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer-ready for prime-time?

Authors:  Emma Pailler; Vincent Faugeroux; Marianne Oulhen; Cyril Catelain; Françoise Farace
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08

6.  Multiple mutations at exon 2 of RHOA detected in plasma from patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Barbara Ottolini; Nadia Nawaz; Christopher S Trethewey; Sami Mamand; Rebecca L Allchin; Richard Dillon; Paul A Fields; Matthew J Ahearne; Simon D Wagner
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-09

Review 7.  K-Ras mutation detection in liquid biopsy and tumor tissue as prognostic biomarker in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Li; Yuanting Zheng; Hong Sun; Rongyuan Zhuang; Jing Liu; Tianshu Liu; Weimin Cai
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Tumor-specific genetic aberrations in cell-free DNA of gastroesophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristina Magaard Koldby; Michael Bau Mortensen; Sönke Detlefsen; Per Pfeiffer; Mads Thomassen; Torben A Kruse
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  The cost of molecular-guided therapy in oncology: a prospective cost study alongside the MOSCATO trial.

Authors:  Arnaud Pagès; Stéphanie Foulon; Zhaomin Zou; Ludovic Lacroix; François Lemare; Thierry de Baère; Christophe Massard; Jean-Charles Soria; Julia Bonastre
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Utility of Serial cfDNA NGS for Prospective Genomic Analysis of Patients on a Phase I Basket Study.

Authors:  Lillian M Smyth; Jonathan B Reichel; Jiabin Tang; Juber Ahamad A Patel; Fanli Meng; Duygu S Selcuklu; Brian Houck-Loomis; Daoqi You; Aliaksandra Samoila; Gaia Schiavon; Bob T Li; Pedram Razavi; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Barry S Taylor; José Baselga; David B Solit; David M Hyman; Michael F Berger; Sarat Chandarlapaty
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.