| Literature DB >> 32562048 |
Sara Lebrazi1, Mouhcine Fadil2, Marwa Chraibi3, Kawtar Fikri-Benbrahim3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is an essential tool for rhizobacteria to stimulate and facilitate plant growth. For this, eighty rhizobial bacteria isolated from root nodules of Acacia cyanophylla grown in different regions of Morocco were firstly screened for their ability to produce IAA. Then, IAA production by a combination of isolates and the inoculation effect on the germination of Acacia cyanophylla seeds was studied using the best performing isolates in terms of IAA production. The best IAA producer bacterial isolate (I69) was selected to optimize IAA production using response surface methodology based on the central composite design.Entities:
Keywords: Experimental design; Indole-3-acetic acid; Optimization; Plant growth; Response surface methodology; Rhizobium
Year: 2020 PMID: 32562048 PMCID: PMC7305276 DOI: 10.1186/s43141-020-00035-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Eng Biotechnol ISSN: 1687-157X
Factors and their levels used in the optimization of IAA production by Rhizobium sp. using the central composite design
| Symbol | Variables | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [L-tryptophan] (g/l) | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | |
| [NaCl] (g/l) | 0 | 2.5 | 5 | |
| Temperature (°C) | 30 | 36 | 42 | |
| pH | 4 | 6.5 | 9 | |
| Incubation time (days) | 1 | 8 | 15 |
Fig. 1Production of IAA by the combination of three rhizobial isolates (I22, I69, and I75)
Fig. 2Inoculation effect by the isolates I22 and I69 on seed germination of Acacia cyanophylla and seedling growth
Experimental plan for the optimization of IAA production by the strain I69: experiment 27, 28, 29, and 30 represent central points
| N°Exp | Incubation temperature (°C) | pH | [NaCl] (g/l) | [Tryptophane] (g/l) | Incubation time (days) | [IAA] (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 4.0 | 0.10 | 1 | 15 | 6.90 |
| 2 | 42 | 4.0 | 0.10 | 1 | 1 | 6.34 |
| 3 | 30 | 9.0 | 0.10 | 1 | 1 | 18.87 |
| 4 | 42 | 9.0 | 0.10 | 1 | 15 | 4.91 |
| 5 | 30 | 4.0 | 1.00 | 1 | 1 | 8.25 |
| 6 | 42 | 4.0 | 1.00 | 1 | 15 | 2.76 |
| 7 | 30 | 9.0 | 1.00 | 1 | 15 | 11.34 |
| 8 | 42 | 9.0 | 1.00 | 1 | 1 | 6.58 |
| 9 | 30 | 4.0 | 0.10 | 9 | 1 | 5.00 |
| 10 | 42 | 4.0 | 0.10 | 9 | 15 | 5.80 |
| 11 | 30 | 9.0 | 0.10 | 9 | 15 | 6.96 |
| 12 | 42 | 9.0 | 0.10 | 9 | 1 | 4.03 |
| 13 | 30 | 4.0 | 1.00 | 9 | 15 | 4.30 |
| 14 | 42 | 4.0 | 1.00 | 9 | 1 | 3.76 |
| 15 | 30 | 9.0 | 1.00 | 9 | 1 | 27.84 |
| 16 | 42 | 9.0 | 1.00 | 9 | 15 | 32.41 |
| 17 | 30 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 8 | 90.72 |
| 18 | 42 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 8 | 2.55 |
| 19 | 36 | 4.0 | 0.55 | 5 | 8 | 2.98 |
| 20 | 36 | 9.0 | 0.55 | 5 | 8 | 16.58 |
| 21 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.10 | 5 | 8 | 119.73 |
| 22 | 36 | 6.5 | 1.00 | 5 | 8 | 123.27 |
| 23 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 1 | 8 | 157.79 |
| 24 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 9 | 8 | 108.14 |
| 25 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 1 | 121.93 |
| 26 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 15 | 88.92 |
| 27 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 8 | 118.19 |
| 28 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 8 | 118.27 |
| 29 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 8 | 117.66 |
| 30 | 36 | 6.5 | 0.55 | 5 | 8 | 117.55 |
Analysis of variance for the fitted model
| Source of variance | DF | SS | MS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 79056.424 | 3952.82 | 6.3636 | 0.0036* | |
| 9 | 5590.451 | 621.16 | |||
| Total | 29 | 84646.875 | |||
| 93% | |||||
R regression, r residual, SS sum of squares, DF degrees of freedom, MS mean square, R2 coefficient of determination
*Statistically significant at p < 0.05 probability
Fig. 3Curve of observed values in term of predicted ones
Effects of model coefficients that relate the response to factors
| Term | Coefficient | Estimation | Erreur standard | Report | Prob.>| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | b0 | 107.99474 | 7.786987 | 13.87 | < 0.0001*** |
| Incubation temperature (30,42) | b1 | − 6.168889 | 5.874433 | − 1.05 | 0.321 |
| pH(4,9) | b2 | 4.635 | 5.874433 | 0.79 | 0.4504 |
| [NaCl](0,1,1) | b3 | 2.3316667 | 5.874433 | 0.4 | 0.7007 |
| [Tryptophane](1,9) | b4 | − 1.416667 | 5.874433 | − 0.24 | 0.8148 |
| Incubation time (1,15) | b5 | − 2.127778 | 5.874433 | − 0.36 | 0.7256 |
| Incubation temperature *pH | b12 | − 0.705625 | 6.230777 | − 0.11 | 0.9123 |
| Incubation temperature *[NaCl] | b13 | 0.651875 | 6.230777 | 0.1 | 0.919 |
| pH*[NaCl] | b23 | 3.023125 | 6.230777 | 0.49 | 0.6391 |
| Incubation temperature *[Tryptophane] | b14 | 1.666875 | 6.230777 | 0.27 | 0.7951 |
| pH*[Tryptophane] | b24 | 2.183125 | 6.230777 | 0.35 | 0.7341 |
| [NaCl]*[Tryptophane] | b34 | 3.413125 | 6.230777 | 0.55 | 0.5972 |
| Incubation temperature *Incubation time | b15 | 3.476875 | 6.230777 | 0.56 | 0.5904 |
| pH*Incubation time | b25 | 0.118125 | 6.230777 | 0.02 | 0.9853 |
| [NaCl]*Incubation time | b35 | 0.878125 | 6.230777 | 0.14 | 0.891 |
| [Tryptophane]*Incubation time | b45 | 1.435625 | 6.230777 | 0.23 | 0.8229 |
| Incubation temperature * Incubation temperature | b11 | − 56.39836 | 15.90287 | − 3.55 | 0.0063** |
| pH * pH | b22 | − 93.25336 | 15.90287 | − 5.86 | 0.0002*** |
| [NaCl]*[NaCl] | b33 | 18.466643 | 15.90287 | 1.16 | 0.2754 |
| [Tryptophane]*[Tryptophane] | b44 | 29.931643 | 15.90287 | 1.88 | 0.0925 |
| Incubation time*Incubation time | b55 | 2.3916429 | 15.90287 | 0.15 | 0.8838 |
**Statistically significant at p < 0.01 probability
***Statistically significant at p < 0.001 probability
Fig. 4Isoresponses plot for the IAA production optimization by considering both incubation temperature and pH factors and by fixing the concentrations of L-Trp at 1 g/l and NaCl at 0.1 g/l and the incubation time at 1 day
Fig. 5Desirability plot showing the precise operating conditions leading to the optimal yield of IAA production