A proof of concept phase I/II pilot trial of LSD1 inhibition by tranylcypromine combined with ATRA in refractory/relapsed AML patients not eligible for intensive therapy.

All-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) is highly active in acute promyelocytic leukemia but not in other types of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Previously, we showed that ATRA in combination with Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) inhibition by tranylcypromine (TCP) can induce myeloid differentiation in AML blasts. This phase I/II clinical trial investigated the safety and efficacy of TCP/ATRA treatment as salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML. The combination was evaluated in 18 patients, ineligible for intensive treatment. The overall response rate was 20%, including two complete remissions without hematological recovery and one partial response. We also observed myeloid differentiation upon TCP/ATRA treatment in patients who did not reach clinical remission. Median overall survival (OS) was 3.3 months, and one-year OS 22%. One patient developed an ATRA-induced differentiation syndrome. The most frequently reported adverse events were vertigo and hypotension. TCP plasma levels correlated with intracellular TCP concentration. Increased H3K4me1 and H3k4me2 levels were observed in AML blasts and white blood cells from some TCP/ATRA treated patients. Combined TCP/ATRA treatment can induce differentiation of AML blasts and lead to clinical response in heavily pretreated patients with r/r AML with acceptable toxicity. These findings emphasize the potential of LSD1 inhibition combined with ATRA for AML treatment.

Introduction

Epigenetic alterations are a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Targeting epigenetic regulators constitutes a promising approach in leukemia treatment [1]. AML blasts exhibit a profound disruption of epigenetic events, i.e., of the CpG island methylation status of promoters of a growing number of genes leading to an aberrant silencing of these genes. Histone methylation can be activating (H3K4me2) or inactivating (H3K27me2). The removal of H3K4me2 is catalyzed by the histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase LSD1, which is highly expressed in blasts from AML patients [2]. Different inhibitors of LSD1 are known, for example tranylcypromine (TCP, trans-2-phenylcyclopropylamine), an irreversible monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor, which has been used as an antidepressant and anxiolytic agent since the 1960s [3]. Recently, we have shown that combinatorial use of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and inhibitors of LSD1 induced differentiation in non-acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) AML cell lines and primary patient samples [4]. Upon LSD1 inhibition in HL-60 AML and TEX cells, which mimic the features of primary human AML cells, by TCP, differentiation was significantly increased [4]. In addition, TCP combined with ATRA-induced myelomonocytic differentiation of primary AML patient samples and diminished leukemic engraftment of primary AML blasts in a NOD.SCID xenograft mouse model [4]. These data established a crosstalk between the ATRA-induced differentiation pathway and LSD1 inhibition as a targetable pathway in non-APL AML patients and formed the rationale for this clinical trial.

Here, we report the results of a phase I/II study of TCP and ATRA in refractory or relapsed AML patients not considered eligible for intensive salvage chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

Study design

The TCP/ATRA trial is a prospective phase I/II open-label, single-arm trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of ATRA combined with TCP in refractory or relapsed patients not eligible for intensive treatment. The trial was conducted at four centers in Germany (Essen, Dresden, Halle, Münster) on behalf of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL). Sponsor of the trial was the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg. The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki (http://clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02261779; EudraCT 2012-002154-23).

Patients

Patients were eligible if aged ≥18 years, with confirmed diagnosis of AML (except AML M3, APL) with relapsed or refractory disease after at least one therapy regime and not considered as fit to receive intensive treatment. Major exclusion criteria were an option of intensive chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 3 or a life expectancy <4 weeks, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg), prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc > 480 ms), inadequate organ function, including left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min) or hepatic impairment (AST/ALT > 2.5-fold or Bilirubin > 1.5-fold the upper normal range). Patients with hypersensitivity to Tretinoin, retinoids, vitamin A, soya, peanuts or TCP or with known epilepsy or psychiatric affections as well as patients taking medication with known interaction with Tretinoin or TCP were excluded. All patients gave written informed consent.

Treatment

All patients received TCP 10 mg orally once daily starting on day one. The dose was increased by 10 mg/day each day up to a maximum dose of 60 mg/day in 7–10 days, depending on patient´s tolerability. ATRA was started on day 7 and administered orally at a total dose of 45 mg/m² per day divided in two doses. In case the TCP dose per day was lower than 50 mg/day, the start of ATRA could be delayed until a TCP dose of 50 mg/day was reached. Before and while on study, treatment with hydroxyurea was allowed to reduce the number of leukocytes. Patients with > 10.000 leukocytes/µl or rapidly rising blast counts could receive dexamethasone if the investigator suspected a high risk of differentiation syndrome. During TCP treatment patients had to follow a low tyramine diet to prevent hypertensive crisis.

At the end of every cycle (day 28), bone marrow analyses were performed for response evaluation. Cycles were scheduled every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD), completed scheduled treatment of 12 months, intolerance/toxicity or discontinuation upon patient or investigator request.

Study endpoints

The primary endpoints of the study were safety and response. Patients were followed until death or regular end of study (defined as 12 months after last treatment). Adverse events (AE) were recorded and graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) version 4.0. The cumulative response rate (complete remission [CR], CRi [CR with incomplete recovery of neutrophils or platelets], partial response [PR]) was assessed according to the Cheson response criteria [5]. Stable disease (SD) was defined as reduction by ≤50% of blast counts in peripheral blood and bone marrow versus baseline, or stable percentage of blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow.

Determinations of tranylcypromine plasma concentrations

Plasma levels of TCP were analyzed by a central laboratory (Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Dr. Eberhard & Partner, Dortmund, Germany) to determine plasma concentrations and association with response.

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the detection of intracellular tranylcypromine concentrations

Intracellular TCP concentrations were analyzed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (Waters ACQUITY UPLC Xevo TQ-XS, Eschborn, Germany). TCP concentrations were calculated assuming an average AML cell diameter of 15 µm. Because TCP irreversibly binds to its target, the assay only quantified unbound tranylcypromine (i.e., TCP that is not covalently bound to its target). The measured intracellular TCP concentrations thus reflect a minimum concentration reached in these cells.

TCP hydrochloride was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). 2H5-TCP (internal standard) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany; purity: 98%). The UPLC-MS/MS eluent was composed of acetonitrile (Biosolve, Valkenswaard, The Netherlands) and water (arium mini Lab Water Systems, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany), which were acidified (0.1 vol-%) with pure formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). For sample preparation procedures, boric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was dissolved in water to create a borate buffer of 0.2 M. Buffer was adjusted to pH 9.0 with sodium hydroxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Tert-butyl methyl ether was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Stock solutions used for calibration, internal quality control (QC), and internal standard were prepared in acetonitrile/water (50/50 vol-%).

To ensure assay stability by balancing losses during sample preparation an internal standard (2H5-TCP) was added to each cell pellet (1 × 107 cells). Subsequently, borate buffer at pH 9.0 was added to each sample to allow for a liquid-liquid extraction using tert-butyl methyl ether. Chromatography was performed on a reversed-phase column (Synergi 2.5 µm Polar-RP 100 × 2 mm column; Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) in isocratic mode using an eluent mixture of acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid (60/40 vol-%). After positive electrospray ionization, mass-to-charge transitions of m/z 134 > 117 (TCP) and m/z 139 > 122 (2H5-TCP) were monitored for TCP quantification. The calibration range was linear from 0.1–2000 pg/1 × 107 cells. Matrix effects caused a slight ion enhancement (115%), which was compensated by the internal standard. The sample preparation ensured that 78% of TCP was recovered from the sample. Samples were analyzed with within-batch and between-batch accuracy of 94–108% and precision of ≤12%.

Western blot

Cells were lysed in SDS lysis buffer (0,1% SDS, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10U/ml Benzonase and Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt Germany)) for 30 min at 4 °C. For target detection 0.5 µg total protein (for H3K4me2 and total H3 detection) and 5 µg total protein (for actin and LSD1 detection) were resolved on 12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed by standard methods using the following antibodies: anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, A5441, 1:5000), anti-total H3 (Abcam, ab39763, 1:5000), anti-H3K4me2 (Abcam, ab32356, 1:5000), anti-LSD1 (Cell Signaling, # 2139S, 1:1000). Each primary antibody had been validated for the relevant species and applications by the manufacturer.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics and demographic data of all patients were summarized descriptively, using medians, means and ranges. All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were analyzed for safety and tolerability, and of those who had at least 14 days of TCP/ATRA treatment also for efficacy. Survival data were evaluated by means of Kaplan–Meier plots. TCP levels between non-responders and responders were analyzed by paired t-test.

Results

Patients characteristics

Between December 2014 and February 2017, 18 patients with a median age of 73 years were enrolled into the TCP/ATRA trial (Fig. 1). Three patients dropped out because they received study medication for less than 14 days. Two of them had intolerance to TCP and one had rapid AML progression and died. These patients were not evaluable for response and survival analysis.

Fig. 1

Consort diagram of the TCP/ATRA trial.

The clinical course of all 18 patients treated in the study is depicted. Reasons for end of treatment are indicated per cycle. Patient UPN are shown in brackets. HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, IC informed consent.

Table 1 displays the clinicopathological characteristics of all patients. Four patients were refractory and among the 14 relapsed patients, 8 patients had relapsed after allogeneic HSCT and 9 patients had at least two or more previous therapy lines. Half of the patients had secondary AML (eight after myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS] and one with therapy-related AML) and almost two-third belonged to the poor-risk cytogenetics group according to the ELN (European LeukemiaNet) recommendations [6].

Table 1

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics.

	N = 18
Median (range) age, years	73 (22–79)
Male/female, n	10/8
ECOG performance status, n (%)
0–1	11 (61.1)
2–3	7 (38.9)
Disease status, n (%)
Refractory	4 (22.2)
Relapsed	14 (77.8)
Median of previously therapy lines (n)
Refractory	1.5 (1 n = 2, 2 n = 2)
Relapsed	2.5 (1 n = 5, 2 n = 2, ≥3 n = 7)
Previously allogeneic HSCT, n	8
Cytogenetics, n (%)
Normal	3 (16.7)
Unfavorable	13 (72.2)
Missing	2 (11.1)
Baseline peripheral blood / bone marrow (range)
Median (range) WBC count, G/L	3.51 (1.27–24.44)
Median (range) peripheral blasts, %	15 (0–89)
Median (range) bone marrow blasts, %	52.5 (10–100)

ECOG Eastern cooperative oncology group, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, WBC white blood cells.

Safety and tolerability

Median duration of treatment was 1.4 cycles (range 0.5–3.5). The major reasons for study termination were refractory/progressive disease (n = 6) or infectious complications which in the assessment of the treating physician were likely due to underlying AML (n = 5). In three patients, the study medication was withdrawn due to intolerance (depression CTC° III, n = 1; confusion CTC° II/III n = 2). None of these AEs were rated as dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). A dose reduction of TCP was necessary in five patients for the following reasons: vertigo CTC° III (n = 2, 60 mg/day to 40 mg/day and 50 mg/day to 30 mg/day, respectively), muscle twitching CTC° II (60 mg/day to 50 mg/day), and confusion CTC° II/III (n = 2; 60 mg/day to 30 and 20 mg/day, respectively). In all these cases, the dose could not be increased again and the two patients with confusion were withdrawn from the study and died after termination of the study from AML progression. In one patient ATRA was paused for 48 h due to a differentiation syndrome. Of 158 AEs reported, 43 were considered to be drug-related (38 to TCP; 4 to ATRA; 1 to both) and 39 of these were non-hematological AEs (Table 2). Overall, the 43 treatment-related AEs were reported in 13 patients (72%). The most common AEs of any grade associated with TCP treatment were hypotension, orthostatic dysregulation, vertigo, and confusion, which were mostly mild. Eleven TCP/ATRA-related grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 7 patients (39%). Irrespective of relatedness, 53 grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 16 patients. The most common of which were infections, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, the latter two occurred in three patients. There were a total of 18 serious AEs (SAEs) of any causality. None of the SAEs were defined as serious adverse reaction (SARs) or suspected unexpected SARs (SUSARs). No significant clinical interaction between TCP and ATRA was observed in term of side effects. A full description of all AEs and SAEs can be found in the Supplement (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).

Table 2

Treatment-related adverse events according to NCI CTC version 4.0 during the TCP/ATRA trial.

Events	Grade
		I	II	III	IV
	n	n	n	n	n
Non-hematological
Vertigo	7	3	3	1	0
Hypotension	4	2	1	1	0
Orthostatic dysregulation/syncope	4	1	3	0	0
Confusion/dizziness	4	0	3	1	0
Skin reaction	4	2	2	0	0
Fatigue	3	0	2	1	0
Xerostomia	2	1	1	0	0
Tinnitus	2	1	1	0	0
Hearing impairmenta	1	0	0	1	0
Vision disorders	1	1	0	0	0
Pain	1	0	1	0	0
Coagulopathya	1	0	0	1	0
Mucositis	1	0	0	1	0
Insomniab	1	0	1	0	0
Muscle twitching	1	0	1	0	0
Myalgia	1	1	0	0	0
Depressiona	1	0	0	1	0
Total number of AEs	39
Hematological
Anemia	1	0	0	1	0
Thrombocytopenia	1	0	0	0	1
Leukocytosisa	1	0	1	0	0
Differentiation syndromea	1	0	0	1	0
Total number of AEs	4

AEs adverse events, NCI CTC National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria.

aRelated to ATRA.

bRelated to both.

Treatment response and survival

With a median follow-up of 15.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 13.9-NA), 17 (94%) of the patients have died. The clinical course of all study patients is depicted in Supplementary Fig. S1. Three out of the 15 evaluable patients had an objective response to TCP/ATRA treatment (Table 3). Two patients achieved a CRi after the first cycle. Median OS of the treated study cohort was 3.36 months (95% CI, 1.38-NA) (Fig. 2).

Table 3

Treatment response.

	n = 15
Best response, n (%)
ORR	3 (19.9)
CR	–
CRi	2 (13.3)
PR	1 (6.7)
SD	4 (26.7)
NR	5 (33.3)
Median overall survival (range), months	3.36 (1.38-NA)

CR complete remission, CRi CR with incomplete recovery of neutrophils/ platelets, NA not applicable, NR no response, ORR overall response rate, PR partial response, SD stable disease.

Fig. 2

Kaplan–Meier overall survival.

Kaplan–Meier plots are shown for all evaluable patients.

Both patients who reached CRi presented at the time of inclusion with refractory disease and unfavorable cytogenetics (Supplementary Table S3). One patient with CRi was withdrawn from the study after two cycles after significant clinical status improvement to undergo allogeneic HSCT. At 20 days after the end of treatment (EOT) and before start of conditioning therapy for allogeneic HSCT the patient relapsed. The other patient achieving a CRi was a 75-year old male with secondary AML, who was refractory after intensive induction therapy with 30% blasts in the bone marrow (Fig. 3a–c). The patient was then enrolled in the TCP/ATRA trial and reached CRi after the first cycle. He continued with the second cycle, but he developed leukemic skin infiltration without evidence of blasts in the bone marrow. Therefore, the treating physicians decided to continue with a third cycle outside of this trial in addition to treatment with 5-azacitidine. At the end of cycle three, the patient had subtotal bone marrow infiltration. He died 5 months later from progressive disease. A PR was reported in one patient after the first cycle, lasting for 4 cycles. But treatment had to be stopped due to ATRA intolerance (depression CTC° III). One patient had a significant reduction of bone marrow blasts (20% to 4%) without fulfilling PR criteria due to persisting blasts in peripheral blood. SD was reported in 4 patients. One of these patients showed a significant improvement in clinical status and underwent allogeneic HSCT from an unrelated donor after the second cycle. This patient is still alive and in clinical remission (CR with 100% donor cell chimerism) at the time of manuscript preparation. The remission status and the correlating pre- and post-treatment bone marrow blast percentages are shown in Fig. S2 (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Fig. 3

Clinical course of an AML patient reaching CRi in the TCP/ATRA trial.

a Clinical course of the patient (03). b Numbers of leukocytes and thrombocytes in the peripheral blood and percentage of blasts in the bone marrow during treatment with TCP + ATRA. c Cell morphology of AML cells in the bone marrow at screening (left), at the end of the first cycle (middle), and at time of relapse (right). Bone marrow smears are stained with Pappenheim and shown at a magnification of 63×. Combination of TCP and ATRA led to morphologically complete remission after one cycle of TCP + ATRA. After the end of cycle three, patient developed relapse.

We also observed myeloid differentiation upon TCP and ATRA treatment in patients who did not reach clinical remission. A 33-year-old male, who was refractory after two cycles of induction therapy including high dose cytarabine, underwent HSCT from his sibling donor. He was then preemptively treated with 5-azacitidine but developed morphological relapse one year later. Being refractory to intensive salvage therapy with FLAG-IDA (Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Idarubicin, G-CSF) the patient was treated with hydroxyurea prior to study registry. Upon trial inclusion, TCP dose escalation was well tolerated and ATRA was started on day 7 without delay (Fig. 4a). On day 5 of the first cycle, hydroxyurea was stopped due to decreasing white blood cells (WBC, 1.5 Gpt/l). After ATRA initiation, WBC rapidly increased to 53.5 Gpt/l within five days (Fig. 4b). At the same time, the patient developed dyspnea, fever, and hypotension. The CT-scan showed non-specific pulmonary infiltrates and pleural effusions (Fig. 4d). On day 12 we observed dominant monocytic differentiation of the blasts in peripheral blood (Fig. 4c). Since the typical signs of a differentiation syndrome were fulfilled, the patient was treated with dexamethasone and a single dose of mitoxantrone (5 mg IV) to alleviate the severe symptoms. ATRA was stopped for 48 h. Subsequently, a rapid reduction of WBC (0.5 Gpt/l) was observed. The patient finished the first cycle, but the bone marrow on day 28 showed refractory disease and study participation was stopped. The patient died one month later due to AML progression.

Fig. 4

Myeloid differentiation syndrome in a patient in the TCP/ATRA trial.

a Clinical course of the patient (05). b Numbers of leukocytes in the peripheral blood during the first cycle. c Cell morphology of AML cells in the peripheral blood on day one and day +12 of the first cycle. Peripheral blood smears are stained with Pappenheim and shown at a magnification of 63×. Treatment with TCP and ATRA leads to morphological signs of differentiation of blasts into polynuclear leukocytes. d Axial CT-scans on day +12 show centrilobular nodules and ground-glass opacity in both lungs with predominantly small spotted alveolar infiltrates and discrete interstitial thickenings. Further pleural effusions on the right more than on the left.

Association of TCP-levels and histone H3K4 methylation with treatment response

TCP concentrations in the plasma of patients were analyzed at different time points: at days 1, 7, 14 and 28 of the first and second cycle, and day 28 of following cycles. TCP levels in plasma of responding patients showed a trend to higher levels than in primary progressive patients whereas patients with stable disease showed intermediate TCP levels (Fig. 5). For four study patients compatible material at different time points was available to determine intracellular TCP concentrations and global H3K4 methylation as a marker of LSD1 activity (Fig. 6a–c). All four patients had varying blast percentages in peripheral blood and bone marrow, respectively (ranging from 17–90% at screening). Sorting of cell populations was not reasonable due to limited material for the different assays after sorting. Thus, we analyzed whole-cell populations after density centrifugation. Intracellular TCP concentrations increased from screening to C1d7 and further time points during treatment (Fig. 6b), which is in line with plasma concentrations (Fig. 6a). This clearly demonstrates the intracellular uptake of TCP within our clinical trial, which is a prerequisite for LSD1 inhibition. For patients 03–004 and 01–002, we identified increased global H3K4 dimethylation at C1d7 and C1d28/C2d28, respectively, as a potential marker of LSD1 inhibition. H3K4 monomethylation was similarly changed. For patient 03–004 blast percentages at diagnosis and C1d7 were 90%, thus western blot results here indeed reflect the chromatin H3K4 methylation status in blasts. But, this patient could not receive ATRA at C1d7 and thus dropped out from study. In two patients (01–003 and 01–005) the changes in H3K4 methylation were inconclusive. For all patients analyzed by western blot LSD1 expression was detectable at screening and time points during treatment (Fig. 6c).

Fig. 5

Tranylcypromine levels and clinical response in the TCP/ATRA trial.

The graphs depict individual patient’s TCP levels over time. Patients are grouped in boxes according to clinical outcomes.

Fig. 6

Tranylcypromine plasma concentrations, intracellular concentrations and H3K4-dimethylation of selected study patients.

a TCP plasma concentrations of indicated study patients at screening and during treatment course. All patients reached the maximum TCP dose of 60 mg/day by day 7. b Intracellular TCP concentrations of indicated study patients at screening and during treatment course. c H3K4me1, H3K4me2, totalH3, LSD1 and Actin protein expression of indicated study patients at screening and during treatment course. H3K4me1/totalH3 and H3K4me2/totalH3 ratios were calculated using ImageJ. Ratios at screening are depicted as a reference value of “1”. Ratios obtained at additional treatment time points are set in proportion accordingly.

In conclusion, although we could demonstrate intracellular uptake of TCP in vivo, we cannot define any biomarkers for TCP/ATRA response due to limited availability of leukemic material within this study.

Discussion

The TCP/ATRA trial investigated the combination of ATRA and the LSD1 inhibitor TCP as salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML patients, who were not eligible for intensive treatment. We observed an overall response rate of 20% including patients who achieved a short-lived CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. The patient cohort was highly enriched for patients with poor prognosis: 40% of patients had relapsed after allogeneic HSCT and 60% had more than two previous therapy lines. Additionally, both patients with CR were refractory to cytarabine induction therapy and harbored an unfavorable karyotype.

In patients with r/r AML, remissions are rarely achieved without intensive chemotherapy or HSCT. In patients with newly diagnosed AML, who are not intensively treatable, non-intensive treatment regimens such as low-dose cytarabine, or hypomethylating agents (HMA) alone induce CR in only 15–20% of patients and 1-year survival rates of these patient cohorts are low with 20–45% [7-10]. The response and survival rates of patients with r/r AML treated non-intensively are worse with a median and 2-years survival of 1.6–3.1 months and 0–4%, respectively [11]. CR/CRi rates for patients treated with HMA are approximately 16% [12]. Recently, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 inhibitors have been shown to induce granulocytic differentiation in leukemic blasts and induce CR/CRi rates of 21% and 19% in r/r AML, respectively [13, 14]. However, these mutations are rare and occur in only 8% and 12% of all AML patients [15]. The efficacy of novel drugs such as venetoclax as single agent is limited in AML [16]. Venetoclax is much more active in combination therapy [17]. Accordingly, it is likely that combination therapies might be more successful in AML than monotherapies. This assumption demands different trial designs that incorporate strategies for synergism at an early stage of drug development.

LSD1 has recently emerged as a therapeutic target in AML with high expression in AML patients [2]. LSD inhibits differentiation, enhances proliferation, invasiveness, and cell motility in AML, and is associated with poor prognosis [18, 19]. Knockdown of LSD1 has been shown to inhibit the growth of AML cells and induce differentiation [4, 20–22]. Different LSD1 inhibitors are currently in development [23]. We recently showed that LSD1 inhibition by TCP induced differentiation in different AML cells and primary AML patient samples [4]. This effect was enhanced when TCP was combined with ATRA via restoring transcriptional inactivated retinoid acid receptor (RAR) target genes, important for myeloid differentiation, and thus sensitizing non-APL cells to ATRA-induced differentiation [4]. The TCP/ATRA trial was designed based upon these results. The findings of myeloid differentiation and clinical responses are in line with synergistic efficacy of LSD1 inhibition and ATRA treatment in non-APL AML patients. Using mass spectrometry we demonstrated intracellular uptake of TCP into patients´ blasts, a prerequisite of LSD1 inhibition. However, we were unable to define molecular markers of LSD1/ATRA response such as differences in H3K4 dimethylation of specific differentiation-associated genes detected in vitro [4] due to limited patient sample availability. We observed increases in global H3K4 methylation upon TCP application in samples of two analyzed patients. But, the use of increased global H3K4 dimethylation as a marker of LSD1 inhibition is controversially discussed in the literature and not regularly observed [4, 24, 25]. Further, varying blast levels in patients´ bone marrow render it difficult to draw clear conclusions with regard to H3K4 methylation and response. Nonetheless, our data clearly indicate plasma concentration-dependent uptake into leukemic blasts in vivo. Also, the observed increases in H3K4 methylation suggest that TCP can inhibit LSD1 demethylase activity in leukemic blasts in AML patients.

TCP is a MAO inhibitor, which has been approved as an antidepressant for almost 60 years. Recently, it was the first drug to be discovered to inhibit LSD1 irreversibly [26]. After a dose-escalating phase of 7 days, we used a dosage of 60 mg/day, which is the recommended maximum daily dose for use to treat depression according to clinical studies and summary of products characteristics [27, 28]. TCP concentrations used in the preclinical experiments are representative of the range of peak plasma concentrations reported in patients treated with this drug [4, 29]. This suggests that the dose, which is similar to the maximum dose used in depressive patients, could be an effective dose in AML patients. As expected, the most frequent TCP-related AEs were vertigo, hypotension, orthostatic dysregulation and confusion/dizziness. In five patients, the TCP dose had to be permanently reduced down to 30 mg/day and could not be increased again. Two patients had to be withdrawn from the study due to persistent intolerance (confusion CTC° II and III, respectively). However, these two patients were already in a poor general condition at the time of study inclusion and died from leukemia progression shortly after the end of the study medication. In addition one of these patients had concomitant infection, which might be reasonable cause for confusion, too. Thus, we did not refer this AE as DLT. Overall, the combination of TCP and ATRA was safe but most patients experienced side effects at higher doses. Different TCP-derived inhibitors, such as ORY1001 or IMG7289, with higher specificity to LSD1 than for MAO could be used to minimize TCP-related side effects. These drugs are still tested in ongoing phase I/II studies, and no safety data have been published so far [19]. Alternatively, reversible LSD inhibitors with safer metabolic profile have shown promising preclinical anti-leukemic properties [19]. For example, SP2509 inhibits cell proliferation and promotes cell differentiation and apoptosis in AML cell lines and primary AML cells without inducing any unrelated in vivo toxicity [30].

In conclusion, treatment with TCP and ATRA is a safe treatment for r/r AML patients. LSD1 inhibition combined with ATRA induces differentiation and clinical response in AML patients. Thus, this clinical trial provides evidence for an LSD1 inhibition/ATRA treatment paradigm. Patients showing response had higher TCP levels compared to non-responders in our trial. However, maintaining high levels may be problematic given the dose-limiting side effects. Therefore, novel LSD1 inhibitors might reach and maintain more effective levels in AML patients, while causing fewer side effects. Particularly, combination of inhibitors of histone modifiers with differentiation drugs might emerge as a powerful new approach in AML therapy.

Supplementary Material_Tables

Swimmer´s plot illustrating the clinical course of study patients

Bone marrow blasts pre- and post-treatment