| Literature DB >> 32560044 |
Sibyle Etievant1,2, Antonin Bal1,2,3,4, Vanessa Escuret1,2,4, Karen Brengel-Pesce3, Maude Bouscambert1,2, Valérie Cheynet3, Laurence Generenaz3, Guy Oriol3, Gregory Destras1, Geneviève Billaud1, Laurence Josset1,4, Emilie Frobert1,4, Florence Morfin1,4, Alexandre Gaymard1,2,4.
Abstract
A reliable diagnostic assay is crucial to early detect new COVID-19 cases and limit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization has published several diagnostic molecular approaches developed by referral laboratories, including Charité (Germany), HKU (Hong Kong), China CDC (China), US CDC (United States), and Institut Pasteur, Paris (France). We aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these different RT-PCR assays using SARS-CoV-2 cell culture supernatants and clinical respiratory samples. Overall, the different RT-PCR assays performed well for SARS-CoV-2 detection and were all specific except the N Charité (Germany), and N2 US CDC (United States) assays. RdRp Institut Pasteur (IP2, IP4), N China CDC, and N1 US CDC were found to be the most sensitive assays. The data presented herein are of prime importance to facilitate the equipment choice of diagnostic laboratories, as well as for the development of marketed tests.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostics; sensitivity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32560044 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241